惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
C
Cisco Blogs
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
Latest news
Latest news
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
AI
AI
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
量子位
Project Zero
Project Zero
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
S
Schneier on Security
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
K
KPMG report finds enterprise disconnect between AI and its ROI | CIO
K
Kaspersky official blog
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
V
Visual Studio Blog
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
W
WeLiveSecurity
博客园 - Franky
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
博客园 - 聂微东
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
小众软件
小众软件
IT之家
IT之家
I
Intezer
The Cloudflare Blog
月光博客
月光博客
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
V
V2EX
博客园_首页
罗磊的独立博客
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
爱范儿
爱范儿
Jina AI
Jina AI
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
A
Arctic Wolf
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
P
Proofpoint News Feed

Creative Good

Changing the address of this RSS feed Protecting elders and kids from predatory tech The garbage on our screens How it’s going in tech – without ethics AI isn’t meant for us Starlink bestows, or forces, the digital age on an Amazonian tribe Microsoft Recall should make you consider Linux Google goes bananums for AI Creative Good: Apple made a terrible mistake: it told the truth To resist the robots, get a typewriter Big Tech’s corruption was 25 years in the making Creative Good: China and TikTok Surviving the customer experience winter The gaping void in San Francisco, New York, and Cambridge Vision Pro, unscrambled, is “I Poison VR” Resisting Silicon Valley’s cult of “more” The airplane blowout came from our rotten Big Tech economy Creative Good: Instagram’s unmentionable problem Marc Andreessen is right – love doesn’t scale Facial recognition and the end of privacy – with Kashmir Hill The Luddites warned us about Google Celebrating 25 years of this newsletter – and an announcement Creative Good: Surveillance spreading Disaster alerts reveal a better way to design tech Don’t throw technology at it Creative Good: AI is spackle Why car companies (still) ignore customers A walk around world raises questions about tech Three things you should listen to An addiction machine for our age Rejecting the Apple Vision Pro What you missed about Google and Amazon Why customers don’t want chat bots The giant brain suck of 2023 My 26-hour delay on Delta Air Lines Is AI a demon or what Creative Good: AI plus whatever ChatGPT’s dangers are starting to show Creative Good: A Simple Desultory Techtonic A picture of the future Where are the customers' chats? Sassy AIs are not the problem AI is creating the Play-Doh internet Who’s responsible for fixing tech? How Google profits from criminal activity ChatGPT’s drawbacks, and how to respond A new year to make tech better A few more inspiring people Why we can’t trust Apple Bonfire of the vanity project As cities embrace surveillance, we can resist A future for people doing good work A Halloween update on Big Tech Creative Good: Moralists, unite Creative Good: A song about surveillance AI is already turning against you. We can fix it. Waking up to the genetic surveillance state another reason to join Creative Good Creative Good: A “what now?” moment Creative Good: A most welcome decline An “internet for the people” or a plastic beach Our last chance in tech Jennifer Egan and a Forum update Creative Good: Citizenship and smartphones Celebrating one year of the Creative Good community Creative Good Forum Walking away from tech Where to go after Twitter An alternative to Amazon, and avoiding data brokers God, death, and tech with Sasha Stiles The web as monopolized surveillance space Human rights and digital spycraft Designing for deceit in Silicon Valley Bandcamp risks becoming an Epic failure The restart of history Why to resist Amazon by cancelling your Prime account Concentration of power is the problem We said ‘never again.’ Now look at Xinjiang Facebook patents and the comet in Don’t Look Up I founded Creative Good 25 years ago today – and learned a few things Are Facebook and Google criminal enterprises? My predictions for Apple’s smart glasses Creative Good Forum The banality of tech Big questions, answered by Big Tech Smiling in the metaverse Big Tech’s latest misbehavior calls for action Facebook’s laughable response to the whistleblower Get your community organization off of Facebook. Now. Voice surveillance must die The fall of Facebook Why we might transform computers into ‘tiles’ Explaining the last 20 years What to do when the storm arrives Public libraries are better than Google WeWork and waste How to prove vaccine status – with privacy We can’t trust tech, from A(pple) to Z(oom) On resisting emperors and their delusions Cameras and con games: Silicon Valley’s demented fun house
Hacks of the ultra-rich, as revealed by Bruce Schneier and Josh O'Kane
2023-08-04 · via Creative Good

I had a fun conversation with Bruce Schneier on Techtonic this week. Bruce is well-known for his work as a security technologist: he’s been writing his Schneier on Security blog for over 20 years, as well as over a dozen books, the latest of which is “A Hacker’s Mind: How the Powerful Bend Society’s Rules, and How to Bend them Back.”

I recommend listening to the interview:

Stream the Bruce Schneier interview

Episode links and comments

Download show as a podcast

True to its title, “A Hacker’s Mind” is about hacks – but not limited to the sorts of digital hacks that we’re accustomed to hearing about (“my phone got hacked” and so on). Instead, Bruce explores hacking in a more general sense, arguing that – if we define hacking as bending the rules for one’s personal gain – the rich and powerful have been hacking systems for centuries. Maybe millennia.

A good example of a hack is tax avoidance strategies, both for individual rich people and for mega-corporations like the Big Tech giants. Schneier writes about PayPal cofounder Peter Thiel’s hack of the Roth IRA, the account where everyday citizens are allowed to deposit a few thousand dollars a year, tax-free. Thiel deposited money in a Roth that he then used to buy over a million shares in PayPal at the discounted price of $0.001 per share. The appreciation of those shares, now worth $5 billion, is all tax-free. It’s totally against the spirit of the Roth IRA, but the hack is legal, allowing Thiel to avoid millions in taxes.

On an organizational level, there are strategies like the “Double Irish with a Dutch Sandwich,” employed for years by Apple and Google to escape their fair share of federal tax. It ran like a convoluted shell game, with subsidiaries in multiple countries each trading off assets and profits to exploit the requisite loopholes. And it worked. As Schneier writes, “Estimates are that US companies avoided paying nearly $200 billion in US taxes in 2017 alone, at the expense of everyone else.”

That’s an important phrase, “at the expense of everyone else.” Because the point is not just that Thiel, and Apple and Google and other powerful interests, are getting rich(er) with unethical tricks. The real insult is that the rest of us are left to face the consequences: underfunded schools and hospitals, creaking infrastructure, and widening inequality, among other problems.

The hacker’s mindset – finding loopholes, exploiting vulnerabilities – has long been a driving force in the tech industry, guiding software development in so-called “disruptive” startups. Some Silicon Valley companies have gotten very, very rich as a result, leading the founders to bring the hacking mindset elsewhere. Case in point is Toronto.

When Google went sideways

Josh O’Kane was my guest on the July 24, 2023 Techtonic, speaking about his book “Sideways: The City Google Couldn’t Buy,” on Google’s failure to build a surveillance neighborhood in Toronto. This is also a recommended listen:

Stream the Josh O’Kane interview

Episode links and comments

Download show as a podcast

Google’s attempt to take over Toronto’s waterfront all started with Larry Page’s idea as a college student, at the University of Michigan, to build a monorail on campus. Page seems to have imagined himself, early on, to be an urban-planning visionary. Now, any fan of the Simpsons will tell you that suggesting a monorail as urban planning is pure comedy. (At least that’s what they say in Ogdenville, Brockway, and North Haverbrook.) The funny thing is that the Simpsons’ monorail episode – Marge vs. the Monorail – aired in January 1993, during Page’s sophomore year at Michigan. If Page saw the episode, it didn’t dissuade him: he was dead serious about his monorail idea.

Of course, the Michigan monorail didn’t get built, as Page lacked the means to put his plans into motion. But within a few years, Page was an oligarch with billions in Google money, looking for places to spread his influence. And so he returned to his urban-planning dreams and asked a team at Google to draw up proposals for a new city, complete with a monorail and lots and lots of surveillance technology pointed at the citizens.

(Side note: Page’s idea for a custom-built city also included, and I’m not making this up, a dome over the city. Which of course is a plot point in The Simpsons Movie, from 2007. It’s entirely possible that Page missed the point of Simpsons satire twice, as he apparently thought that a monorail, and a city under a dome, were both viable urban-planning ideas.)

Page’s team, searching for enough open real estate to build the surveillance city, finally alighted on Toronto, where there’s a stretch of undeveloped waterfront adjoining downtown. Here’s a photo I took of that area in July, on a flight out of Toronto City Airport:

The problem is that Toronto, a famously process-oriented city, was not going to allow Page to roll in and start building with no oversight. Following the approach described in Bruce Schneier’s book, the Google subsidiary called Sidewalk Labs attempted various hacks – routing around various oversight bodies, making intentionally vague promises, and generally trying to sidestep Toronto’s municipal, provincial, and federal levels of regulation. Toronto pushed back: from activists in #BlockSidewalk to journalists (like Josh O’Kane) to the regulators themselves, resistance to Google eventually became so fierce that the company backed out. This trillion-dollar monopoly, accustomed to enjoying its Double Irish with a Dutch Sandwich, was defeated by the power of citizens.

And this is the hopeful note that brings an end to both Schneier’s and O’Kane’s books. Even as monopolies grow in scope and influence, the rest of us can band together to fight for a better society: closing the loopholes, forcing behemoths to pay their fair share in taxes, and standing ready to raise the alarm whenever the next clueless billionaire comes to town talking about a monorail.

To support my work, please join the Creative Good Forum. (You can also post and read comments.)

Until next time,

-mark

Mark Hurst, founder, Creative Good – see official announcement and join as a member
Email: mark@creativegood.com
Listen to my podcast/radio show: techtonic.fm
Subscribe to my email newsletter
Sign up for my to-do list with privacy built in, Good Todo
On Mastodon: @markhurst@mastodon.social

- – -

LET’S MAKE TECH BETTER: JOIN US.

Mission

Creative Good creates good experiences — for our consulting clients, our Good Todo users, our newsletter readers, and all of our fans.

Contact

Creative Good, 2808 Broadway #17, New York, NY 10025 USA
Phone: +1.646.543.3530
Email: emailus@creativegood.com