惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
博客园 - 聂微东
Vercel News
Vercel News
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
B
Blog
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
GbyAI
GbyAI
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
博客园_首页
博客园 - 叶小钗
腾讯CDC
G
Google Developers Blog
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
D
Docker

JAMS ADR

Request for Information for: AI Expert Vendors Seven JAMS Neutrals Recognized in Mondaq’s Spring 2026 Thought Leadership Awards Designing Resolution: Why Intent Matters in Mediation Matt White Joins JAMS in San Francisco Matt White, JAMS Mediator and Arbitrator Hon. Sean Cox (Ret.) Honored With the Judicial Excellence Award by the Litigation Section of the State Bar of Michigan The Well-Prepared Attorney: Setting the Course for Mediation Success Retired Judge’s Rock Star Era Helps Him Resolve Legal Cases Weinstein JAMS International Fellowship Application Hon. David S. Cunningham lll (Ret.) Joins JAMS in Los Angeles Hon. David S. Cunningham III (Ret.), JAMS Mediator and Arbitrator Stacy La Scala, Esq., Honored With the Jerrold S. Oliver “Ollie” Award of Excellence at the West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar Beyond 'Changing Hats': The Case for Mediated Carveouts in International Arbitration JAMS Foundation Recognizes DC Peace Team Why the Right Conversation at the Wrong Time Can Derail Mediation JAMS Lauches ADR Technology Industry Group PFAS Disputes and Arbitration’s Potential Role JAMS Neutral Kessler Honored at Loyola Law School Reunion Can Family Abuse be Halted by Psychological Intimidation Laws? These States are Trying Do Not Forget Insurance Professionals Same Name, Different Paths: A Case of Mistaken Identity Hon. Thomas Drechsler (Ret.) Joins JAMS in Boston William “Bill” H. Farmer, Esq., Honored With the Jack Norman, Sr. Award by the Nashville Bar Association Foreign Sovereign Immunity in International Construction JAMS Reports Rising Global Demand for ADR in 2025 Resolution Report Hon. Julie E. Frantz (Ret.) Joins JAMS in Seattle Hon. Julie E. Frantz (Ret.) Joins JAMS in Portland Hon. Julie E. Frantz (Ret.), JAMS Mediator and Arbitrator Through the Lens: Focus on Robyn A. Millenacker Retired Eastern Va. Judge Joins JAMS DC Resolution Center
Successful Strategies for Resolving IP Disputes in Mediation
Lawrence “Larry” H. Kunin · 2026-05-20 · via JAMS ADR

A common criticism of mediators is when they become “letter carriers.” This occurs when the mediator essentially moves between rooms simply restating what the other side has stated. Many mediations will eventually get to the letter carrier stage, but letter carrying at or near the beginning of an intellectual property (IP) mediation occurs when the mediator does not understand the subject matter and/or where the parties are not sufficiently prepared to be challenged during mediation.

Mediators are ethically barred from opining on the merits of a dispute. But that does not prohibit the mediator from asking challenging questions, known as reality testing, regarding IP-specific positions.

Selecting a Mediator IP disputes involve several unique issues: federal and state statutory law, IP registrations, prior use and/ or prior art. It is possible that there are also pending or decided administrative reviews by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board or by the U.S.Patent and Trademark Office. 

Full article below:

A common criticism of mediators is when they become “letter carriers.” This occurs when the mediator essentially moves between rooms simply restating what the other side has stated. Many mediations will eventually get to the letter carrier stage, but letter carrying at or near the beginning of an intellectual property (IP) mediation occurs when the mediator does not understand the subject matter and/or where the parties are not sufficiently prepared to be challenged during mediation.

Mediators are ethically barred from opining on the merits of a dispute. But that does not prohibit the mediator from asking challenging questions, known as reality testing, regarding IP-specific positions.

Selecting a Mediator IP disputes involve several unique issues: federal and state statutory law, IP registrations, prior use and/ or prior art. It is possible that there are also pending or decided administrative reviews by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board or by the U.S.Patent and Trademark Office. 

Full article below:

Banner with “Stay Connected” text, subscribe and events buttons, and a photo of people networking in a modern office.

Stay Connected

Sign up to hear about upcoming events or to access information or recordings of past events and webinars.

Subscribe View All Events