惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

T
Troy Hunt's Blog
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
K
KPMG report finds enterprise disconnect between AI and its ROI | CIO
Schneier on Security
Schneier on Security
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
Help Net Security
Help Net Security
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
P
Privacy International News Feed
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
A
Arctic Wolf
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
P
Proofpoint News Feed
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security
PCI Perspectives
PCI Perspectives
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
T
Tenable Blog
S
Security Affairs
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
W
WeLiveSecurity
Jina AI
Jina AI
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
S
Securelist
AI
AI
Latest news
Latest news
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
月光博客
月光博客
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
美团技术团队
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
C
Cisco Blogs
V
Visual Studio Blog
L
LangChain Blog

Datadog | The Monitor blog

Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What’s new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis Monitor Aruba Central in Datadog How we centralize and remediate risks with Datadog Case Management Accelerate incident response with Datadog and ServiceNow Monitor your application and network load balancer logs Understanding Karpenter architecture for Kubernetes autoscaling Tools for collecting metrics and logs from Karpenter Monitor Karpenter with Datadog What your product data is actually saying Key metrics for monitoring Karpenter Securing Datadog’s platform in the AI age: The role of observability data Four ways engineering teams use the Datadog MCP Server to power AI agents Approaching your observability migration with the right mindset Meet the new Bits AI SRE: Deeper reasoning, twice as fast Key learnings from the 2026 State of DevSecOps study Use plain English to query your multi-cloud infrastructure in Resource Catalog Simplifying troubleshooting across the user journey with Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Protect your OCI resources with Datadog Cloud Security This Month in Datadog - February 2026 Amazon EC2 security: How misconfigured and public AMIs expand your cloud attack surface Enable end-to-end visibility into your Java apps with a single command Measure and improve mobile app startup performance with Datadog RUM Evaluating our AI Guard application to improve quality and control cost Identify untested code across every level of your codebase Monitor Versa Networks SD-WAN performance in Datadog Improve performance and reliability with APM Recommendations Remediate transitive vulnerabilities faster with Datadog Software Composition Analysis Generate audit-ready vulnerability and compliance reports with Datadog Sheets Monitor Fortinet FortiManager performance in Datadog Improve test coverage across codebases with Datadog Code Coverage Move fast, don’t break things: Consistent testing standards at scale Enrich logs with ServiceNow CMDB context before routing to any SIEM or logging tool Monitor Lustre with Datadog Make faster, better product decisions with Datadog Product Analytics Surface and remediate runtime posture issues with Workload Protection Findings Protect agentic AI applications with Datadog AI Guard How to optimize JavaScript code with CSS Trace Google Pub/Sub workloads in Cloud Run with Datadog Detect human names in logs with ML in Sensitive Data Scanner How we cut our NLQ agent debugging time from hours to minutes with LLM Observability Debug PostgreSQL query latency faster with EXPLAIN ANALYZE in Datadog Database Monitoring Datadog acquires Propolis Unify and correlate frontend and backend data with retention filters Scale compliance across global frameworks with Datadog Cloud Security Monitor Arista VeloCloud SD-WAN performance with Datadog Building reliable dashboard agents with Datadog LLM Observability Simplify log collection and aggregation for MSSPs with Datadog Observability Pipelines Mitigation for Node.js denial-of-service vulnerability affecting Datadog APM Automate flaky test fixes with the Bits AI Dev Agent and Test Optimization How we built an AI SRE agent that investigates like a team of engineers Datadog integrations 2025 recap: Observability for AI, security, and hybrid cloud Design effective executive dashboards with Datadog Implement dbt data quality checks with dbt-expectations Bring faster visibility into AWS Lambda functions with remote instrumentation Troubleshoot faster with the GitLab Source Code integration in Datadog How Cambia Health Solutions saved $30,000 monthly with Cloud Cost Management and the Datadog Resource Catalog Normalize any logs for Cloud SIEM with Datadog's OCSF processor Optimizing Datadog at scale: Cost-efficient observability at Zendesk Detect, diagnose, and resolve network issues easily with CNM Network Health Securing customer logins with breach intelligence Connect engineering errors to user impact in early-stage products Cilium configuration for Kubernetes operations at scale Designing feedback loops for progressive delivery Ship features faster and safer with Datadog Feature Flags Choosing the right OpenTelemetry Collector distribution Route your monitor alerts with Datadog monitor notification rules Automate Cloud SIEM investigations with Bits AI Security Analyst Cloud threat detection: How to identify risky activity across control and data planes Collecting Kafka performance metrics Monitoring Kafka with Datadog Monitoring Kafka performance metrics
Make use of guardrail metrics and stop babysitting your releases
Anthony Rindone, Eric Metaj · 2026-02-19 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog

Modern CI/CD pipelines have automated the hard work of building, testing, and deploying our code. But for many teams, that’s where the automation stops. The most critical part of a release, turning a new feature on for real users, is still a stressful, manual process.

An engineer cautiously ramps up traffic to 5%, then 10%. The whole team stares at dashboards, trying to see if anything breaks. If something does, they scramble to manually roll back. We call this process babysitting a release, and it’s slow, risky, and doesn’t scale. In this post, we’ll look at the challenges of manual rollouts and show you how automating releases with guardrail metrics can save your team time, reduce risk, and eliminate the need to babysit rollouts.

Create an automated safety net with guardrail metrics

Consider a Tuesday afternoon release war room, where three engineers and a product manager huddle in a video call. One engineer has their finger on the feature flag’s traffic slider, while the others have multiple Datadog dashboards open. The rollout begins with the first engineer rolling out to 1% of the users. Slack fills with messages, with one engineer noticing a spike but unsure of the cause. It takes 10 minutes of frantic cross-checking before they realize a bug is causing a small but significant increase in errors. They manually roll back, but the issue has already affected hundreds of users, and the process has consumed over an hour of the team’s time.

The problem with the above example is the lack of an intelligent safety net that makes use of guardrail metrics. A guardrail metric is a specific health indicator that you choose to protect during a release. It acts as a tripwire. If your new feature causes this metric to cross a dangerous threshold, the system automatically takes action. You can use any metric you already have in Datadog to create a guardrail, such as:

  • Error rate: Roll back if the 5xx error rate for the new version is higher than the baseline.

  • CPU utilization: Roll back if the CPU on the service’s hosts exceeds 80%.

  • P99 latency: Roll back if latency increases by more than 20% for the users with the new feature.

A screenshot showing how guardrail metrics are used in Datadog Feature Flags.

Let’s look at that same Tuesday release using guardrail metrics. A single engineer opens the feature flag, having already configured a three-stage rollout plan and linked it to a guardrail metric for the checkout service’s error rate. She clicks Start Rollout and turns her attention to her next task. Ten minutes later, a Slack alert appears: “Automated Rollback Triggered: ‘New Checkout Flow’ violated the error rate guardrail.” The system detected the error spike, automatically rolled the feature back to 0%, and prevented a wider incident. The entire event was handled in minutes, with minimal user impact and little engineering toil.

When your feature management is built into your observability platform, you can connect a release directly to these guardrails. Instead of manually ramping traffic, you can define a progressive rollout plan that will only advance to the next stage if your guardrail metrics are healthy. The moment a guardrail is breached, the system will instantly and automatically roll back the feature flag to 0%, stopping the incident before it impacts more users.

From guardrails to automated feature management

While defining a guardrail is an important first step, the real value comes from how it is enforced and the data behind it. That’s why Datadog Feature Flags runs on the same metrics foundation teams already use in Datadog. Existing APM service metrics, RUM performance data, and Product Analytics KPIs can be attached directly to a rollout, with no separate integration to maintain and no additional instrumentation required.

When you configure a progressive rollout, each stage is evaluated against live telemetry data before traffic expands. Server-side changes are validated with APM metrics such as error rate and latency, and client-side features are evaluated with RUM and Product Analytics signals such as page load time, frontend errors, and user behavior. This reduces incident risk and limits any potential incident damage.

The feature flag page surfaces real-time exposure and performance by variant, so you can see which cohorts are receiving the feature and how it affects system health. If metrics remain within defined thresholds, traffic increases automatically. If a threshold is breached, the rollout pauses or rolls back immediately. Manual release oversight can be eliminated, with rollouts advancing or reverting based on system health for smaller, safer changes.

Evaluate your release process today

Think about your last release. Was it a calm, automated process, or a manual, all-hands-on-deck event? If your team is still babysitting releases, it’s time to build a safety net. By connecting your releases to live observability data, you can finally stop babysitting them and build a repeatable, automated process that lets your team ship faster and with more confidence. To learn more, see how Datadog Feature Flags can connect your releases to your observability data. And check out our guide on configuring automated rollouts to get started.

If you’re new to Datadog, sign up for a 14-day free trial.