惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
IT之家
IT之家
G
Google Developers Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
博客园 - 司徒正美
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
J
Java Code Geeks
The Cloudflare Blog
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
博客园 - Franky
雷峰网
雷峰网
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
Vercel News
Vercel News
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
B
Blog
小众软件
小众软件
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
H
Hacker News: Front Page
H
Help Net Security
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
V
V2EX
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
O
OpenAI News
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
S
Secure Thoughts
Help Net Security
Help Net Security
F
Full Disclosure
博客园 - 叶小钗
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Jina AI
Jina AI
K
Kaspersky official blog
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
P
Privacy International News Feed
Scott Helme
Scott Helme

Datadog | The Monitor blog

Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What’s new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis Monitor Aruba Central in Datadog How we centralize and remediate risks with Datadog Case Management Accelerate incident response with Datadog and ServiceNow Monitor your application and network load balancer logs Understanding Karpenter architecture for Kubernetes autoscaling Tools for collecting metrics and logs from Karpenter Monitor Karpenter with Datadog What your product data is actually saying Key metrics for monitoring Karpenter Securing Datadog’s platform in the AI age: The role of observability data Four ways engineering teams use the Datadog MCP Server to power AI agents Approaching your observability migration with the right mindset Meet the new Bits AI SRE: Deeper reasoning, twice as fast Key learnings from the 2026 State of DevSecOps study Use plain English to query your multi-cloud infrastructure in Resource Catalog Simplifying troubleshooting across the user journey with Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Protect your OCI resources with Datadog Cloud Security This Month in Datadog - February 2026 Amazon EC2 security: How misconfigured and public AMIs expand your cloud attack surface Enable end-to-end visibility into your Java apps with a single command Measure and improve mobile app startup performance with Datadog RUM Evaluating our AI Guard application to improve quality and control cost Identify untested code across every level of your codebase Make use of guardrail metrics and stop babysitting your releases Monitor Versa Networks SD-WAN performance in Datadog Improve performance and reliability with APM Recommendations Remediate transitive vulnerabilities faster with Datadog Software Composition Analysis Generate audit-ready vulnerability and compliance reports with Datadog Sheets Monitor Fortinet FortiManager performance in Datadog Improve test coverage across codebases with Datadog Code Coverage Move fast, don’t break things: Consistent testing standards at scale Enrich logs with ServiceNow CMDB context before routing to any SIEM or logging tool Monitor Lustre with Datadog Make faster, better product decisions with Datadog Product Analytics Surface and remediate runtime posture issues with Workload Protection Findings Protect agentic AI applications with Datadog AI Guard How to optimize JavaScript code with CSS Trace Google Pub/Sub workloads in Cloud Run with Datadog Detect human names in logs with ML in Sensitive Data Scanner How we cut our NLQ agent debugging time from hours to minutes with LLM Observability Debug PostgreSQL query latency faster with EXPLAIN ANALYZE in Datadog Database Monitoring Datadog acquires Propolis Unify and correlate frontend and backend data with retention filters Scale compliance across global frameworks with Datadog Cloud Security Monitor Arista VeloCloud SD-WAN performance with Datadog Building reliable dashboard agents with Datadog LLM Observability Simplify log collection and aggregation for MSSPs with Datadog Observability Pipelines Mitigation for Node.js denial-of-service vulnerability affecting Datadog APM Automate flaky test fixes with the Bits AI Dev Agent and Test Optimization How we built an AI SRE agent that investigates like a team of engineers Datadog integrations 2025 recap: Observability for AI, security, and hybrid cloud Design effective executive dashboards with Datadog Implement dbt data quality checks with dbt-expectations Bring faster visibility into AWS Lambda functions with remote instrumentation Troubleshoot faster with the GitLab Source Code integration in Datadog How Cambia Health Solutions saved $30,000 monthly with Cloud Cost Management and the Datadog Resource Catalog Normalize any logs for Cloud SIEM with Datadog's OCSF processor Optimizing Datadog at scale: Cost-efficient observability at Zendesk Detect, diagnose, and resolve network issues easily with CNM Network Health Securing customer logins with breach intelligence Connect engineering errors to user impact in early-stage products Cilium configuration for Kubernetes operations at scale Designing feedback loops for progressive delivery Ship features faster and safer with Datadog Feature Flags Choosing the right OpenTelemetry Collector distribution Route your monitor alerts with Datadog monitor notification rules Automate Cloud SIEM investigations with Bits AI Security Analyst Cloud threat detection: How to identify risky activity across control and data planes Collecting Kafka performance metrics Monitoring Kafka with Datadog Monitoring Kafka performance metrics
Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring
Sangeeta Shivaji Rao, Mike Peralta · 2026-04-02 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog

ClickHouse is widely used for large-scale analytics, but once it is running in production, it can be difficult to understand how query activity translates into resource usage. Engineers investigating performance issues often struggle to determine which queries consume the most memory, run most frequently, or cause spikes in load. In practice, engineers are left querying system.query_log, tailing server logs, and piecing together information after an incident. While this can show what queries are running at a given moment, it does not provide a consistent way to compare queries across a cluster. It also does not reveal the overall impact of a query or show what it actually costs once it is finished.

Datadog Database Monitoring for ClickHouse, available in Preview, provides a unified view of query performance across both ClickHouse Cloud and self-hosted deployments. It collects aggregated query metrics, captures completed query samples, and surfaces real-time query activity so that teams can identify inefficient queries, investigate incidents, and optimize workloads.

In this post, we’ll cover how Database Monitoring for ClickHouse helps you:

  • Find your most expensive queries

  • Reconstruct what happened during an incident

Find your most expensive queries

Understanding query performance at scale requires more than reviewing individual slow queries. Engineers need to compare patterns across the cluster, including how often queries run, how long they take, and how much data they process. Without this context, teams might focus on outliers and miss the queries that drive most resource usage, such as queries that run thousands of times per hour.

Database Monitoring collects aggregated metrics for each normalized query pattern in your ClickHouse environment. This helps engineers evaluate queries by overall impact, not just latency. For example, a moderately slow query that runs frequently can have a greater effect than a single long-running query.

These metrics include execution count within a collection window, total and average duration, memory usage, and I/O activity such as rows and bytes read or written. They also include result set size, which helps teams understand how much data queries return to clients. With this data, teams can identify which query patterns drive the highest cost and prioritize optimization work.

Database Monitoring for ClickHouse brings all this together in one place, as shown in the preceding screen capture. The ClickHouse instance page gives you two complementary views for identifying expensive queries. The stacked bar chart breaks down sessions over time by query pattern. You can scan for spikes in load and hover over individual bars to see which query patterns were active at that moment, making it easy to correlate load spikes with specific queries.

Below the chart, the Queries table ranks query patterns by their current impact. Together, these views let you move beyond “which query is slowest” to “which query costs the most overall,” whether that’s a high-frequency moderate query or a low-frequency heavy one. The Query Metrics view lets you rank queries by the metric that actually matters: the total impact on the system. This way, you can optimize the right queries first, not just the most frequent or the slowest ones.

Reconstruct what happened during an incident

When performance issues occur, aggregated metrics are not enough. Engineers also need to understand the resource profile of each query execution—specifically, how individual queries performed at a specific point in time. To construct this profile, teams might resort to querying system.query_log across each node in the cluster, filtering through large volumes of entries, and correlating timestamps. On busy clusters, retention settings may even remove the data needed to perform a full investigation.

Database Monitoring captures completed query samples for each execution and stores them independently of ClickHouse logs. Teams can view these samples across multiple instances and clusters in a single place, which makes it easier to investigate issues that span distributed environments.

Each query sample includes detailed execution context, including query text (with sensitive values hidden), execution duration, memory usage, and data read and written. It also includes result set size and metadata such as user, database, tables accessed, and query type. All this context gives teams a clear picture of how queries interact with the entire system.

A completed query sample showing execution duration, memory usage, and event attributes.

With this data, engineers can also reconstruct incidents after they occur. They can identify which queries caused spikes in memory usage, determine whether workload changes contributed to degraded performance, and trace issues to specific users or services. Because Datadog retains this data, teams are not limited by ClickHouse log retention settings.

Get started with ClickHouse Database Monitoring

Database Monitoring for ClickHouse gives engineers a full, unified view of query performance, helping teams reduce costs, improve performance, and respond more effectively to incidents. Teams can view aggregated query metrics, completed query samples, and active queries in real time across all ClickHouse deployments in one place, alongside the rest of their Datadog observability data.

Database Monitoring for ClickHouse is available in Preview for both ClickHouse Cloud and self-hosted deployments. For setup details, see the ClickHouse Database Monitoring documentation or request access on the Preview page.

If you’re new to Datadog, sign up for a 14-day free trial.