惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
H
Hacker News: Front Page
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
T
ThreatConnect
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
博客园_首页
T
True Tiger Recordings
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
B
Blog
IT之家
IT之家
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
F
Full Disclosure
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
C
Comments on: Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
博客园 - 【当耐特】
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
腾讯CDC
雷峰网
雷峰网
Security Latest
Security Latest
李成银的技术随笔
M
Microsoft Research Blog - Microsoft Research
L
LangChain Blog
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
C
Check Point Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
博客园 - Franky
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
V
V2EX
A
About on SuperTechFans
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
月光博客
月光博客
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
IntelliJ IDEA : IntelliJ IDEA – the Leading IDE for Professional Development in Java and Kotlin | The JetBrains Blog
IntelliJ IDEA : IntelliJ IDEA – the Leading IDE for Professional Development in Java and Kotlin | The JetBrains Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
A
Arctic Wolf
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More

Datadog | The Monitor blog

Reduce CVE noise with OpenVEX assessments in Datadog How we made a SQL query optimization agent 59% more accurate using autoresearch and LLM Observability How to audit and clean up monitors effectively Diagnose slow PostgreSQL queries faster with explain plan correlation Explore Datadog metrics with Natural Language Queries Toto 2.0: Time series forecasting enters the scaling era Simplify micro-frontend observability with Datadog RUM Attribute AI costs across providers with Datadog Cloud Cost Management Diagnose and resolve database performance issues faster with Database Investigator Datadog for Government achieves FedRAMP® High certification Analyze cloud costs with flexible spreadsheets in Datadog Sheets Inside Datadog’s AI Research Lab: Meet two PhD candidates behind Toto Connect triage and investigation in a single workflow with Datadog Cloud SIEM This Month in Datadog - April 2026 Monitor and optimize Supabase query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring Add dynamically updating context to logs with Reference Tables and Observability Pipelines Introducing ARFBench: A time series question-answering benchmark based on real incidents Test network paths with TCP, UDP, and ICMP in Datadog The product signal latency gap slowing your growth How to investigate cloud credential compromise with Bits AI Security Analyst Evaluate, optimize, and secure your Google Cloud AI stack with Datadog Turn developer feedback into operational insight with Datadog Forms and Sheets Identify and fix code issues faster with Datadog’s Azure DevOps Source Code integration Steganography at scale: Embedding share URLs in Datadog widget screenshots Bringing observability data hosting to the UK on AWS Centralize observability management with Datadog Governance Console Every team should be A/B testing Manage service tracing across hosts with Single Step Instrumentation rules Route OTel data from AI apps to ClickHouse and Datadog using Observability Pipelines Spotting CI/CD misconfigurations before the bots do: Securing GitHub Actions with Datadog IaC Security Detect runtime threats in Python Lambda functions with Datadog AAP Offline evaluation for AI agents: Best practices Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API How we built a real-world evaluation platform for autonomous SRE agents at scale Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure When upserts don't update but still write: Debugging Postgres performance at scale Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What's new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis Monitor Aruba Central in Datadog How we centralize and remediate risks with Datadog Case Management Accelerate incident response with Datadog and ServiceNow Monitor your application and network load balancer logs Understanding Karpenter architecture for Kubernetes autoscaling Tools for collecting metrics and logs from Karpenter Monitor Karpenter with Datadog What your product data is actually saying Key metrics for monitoring Karpenter Securing Datadog's platform in the AI age: The role of observability data Closing the verification loop: Observability-driven harnesses for building with agents Closing the verification loop, Part 2: Fully autonomous optimization When an AI agent came knocking: Catching malicious contributions in Datadog’s open source repos Four ways engineering teams use the Datadog MCP Server to power AI agents Approaching your observability migration with the right mindset Meet the new Bits AI SRE: Deeper reasoning, twice as fast Designing MCP tools for agents: Lessons from building Datadog's MCP server Key learnings from the 2026 State of DevSecOps study Use plain English to query your multi-cloud infrastructure in Resource Catalog Simplifying troubleshooting across the user journey with Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Protect your OCI resources with Datadog Cloud Security This Month in Datadog - February 2026 Fine-tune Toto for turbocharged forecasts Amazon EC2 security: How misconfigured and public AMIs expand your cloud attack surface Enable end-to-end visibility into your Java apps with a single command Measure and improve mobile app startup performance with Datadog RUM Evaluating our AI Guard application to improve quality and control cost Identify untested code across every level of your codebase Make use of guardrail metrics and stop babysitting your releases Monitor Versa Networks SD-WAN performance in Datadog How we reduced the size of our Agent Go binaries by up to 77% Improve performance and reliability with APM Recommendations Remediate transitive vulnerabilities faster with Datadog Software Composition Analysis Generate audit-ready vulnerability and compliance reports with Datadog Sheets Monitor Fortinet FortiManager performance in Datadog Improve test coverage across codebases with Datadog Code Coverage
Detect human names in logs with ML in Sensitive Data Scanner
2026-02-02 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog
Pronoy Chaudhuri

Pronoy Chaudhuri

Modern applications generate a constant stream of logs, some of which carry more information than they should. For too many organizations, logs include personally identifiable information (PII) such as customer names that were never meant to leave production systems. Teams try to limit this data exposure by using regular expressions to detect and obfuscate matches, only to discover that names like John O’Connor, Mary-Jane, Jane van der Meer, and A. García slip through. Punctuation, hyphenation, multiword surnames, initials, diacritics, and casing make handcrafted patterns fragile, forcing engineers to tune exceptions while names continue to appear in logs. Additionally, false positive findings for technologies that have human names, such as Cassandra and Jenkins, add to operational friction and hamper observability.

Datadog Sensitive Data Scanner (SDS) human name detection, now generally available for all commercial Datadog sites and available in Preview in US1-FED, helps solve these challenges. Human name detection introduces a built-in, machine learning (ML)–based rule that automatically identifies first, last, and full human names in your application logs. With the Human Name Scanner rule, you can detect and optionally obfuscate names without creating and maintaining a collection of regex patterns. As a result, you can validate upstream redaction, strengthen compliance efforts for standards such as GDPR, and reduce false positives.

In this post, we’ll explore:

How human name detection works

Human name detection uses an ML pipeline that focuses on dynamic log content, which is where PII tends to exist. A fast candidate filter points out tokens that are likely human names, and then a Datadog-hosted ML classifier confirms whether those tokens are names by using context instead of relying on brittle pattern matching. This staged approach to detection helps maintain accuracy at scale without requiring you to operate model infrastructure or maintain custom dictionaries.

After you set up a scanning group that defines what data to scan, you can enable the Human Name Scanner rule from the SDS Scanning Rules Library and select the action that Datadog SDS should take when a match occurs. The following actions are available:

  • Redact: Replace the full matching value with a placeholder.
  • Partially Redact: Replace a specific portion of the matching value.
  • Hash: Produce a deterministic token that enables you to correlate repeated appearances of the matching value across logs without storing the original name.
  • Mask: Obfuscate the matching value, but reveal it to users who have the appropriate permission to unmask it (for example, during security incidents).
Screenshot of a rule configuration with the Human Name Scanner rule enabled and hashing selected.

The following example shows how the Human Name Scanner rule behaves in practice. The screenshot from Datadog Log Management shows a log message that confirms an order for a user named John O'Connor by mentioning John’s name on two occasions. The log message also includes two references to the human-sounding name Ruby: one in the source (ruby) and one in the store_name (Ruby's Vinyls).

Screenshot of a log message that confirms an order by John O’Connor from Ruby’s Vinyls.

Writing a regex pattern that reliably detects the name in this example is difficult because variants such as O'Connor, O’Connor (different apostrophe), and O Connor require multiple alternations. With the Human Name Scanner rule enabled, Datadog SDS detects mentions of the name in the log and applies your configured action while leaving non-sensitive fields intact. The following screenshot shows how human name detection hashes John O. and O'Connor while avoiding false positives by not flagging ruby or Ruby in the same log.

Screenshot of the log message where John O’Connor’s name is hashed with a lengthy alphanumeric identifier.

You can review matches from the Human Name Scanner rule on the SDS Findings page, which aggregates detections by rule and priority so that you can pivot into the underlying logs, verify examples, and create a case or incident when necessary. Because findings are tagged with rule metadata, you can also use log search, monitors, and dashboards to track trends in name detection across services.

Screenshot of a finding by human name detection. The finding provides a list of logs to investigate and notes the impacted services.

Datadog SDS also provides the ability to suppress particular matches if your organization decides to risk-accept specific names, such as company names that resemble human names. You can edit the Human Name Scanner rule to avoid flagging names such as Bauer, which is suppressed in the following screenshot. You can test your new match conditions by pasting in log content to find out how human name detection reacts.

Screenshot of functionality to edit the Human Name Scanner rule to add a suppression.

Best practices for improving PII compliance

With its abilities to identify and obfuscate names, human name detection can help you enhance PII compliance with standards such as GDPR. You can pursue these goals by introducing human name detection in a focused scope where you validate matches, tune actions, and communicate changes before you expand coverage to additional services and environments. A common pattern is to start with a small set of high-risk services that likely process end-user data, configure the Human Name Scanner rule to log findings without redaction, review examples on the SDS Findings page, and then switch those services to redact or hash.

Action selection plays an important role in supporting compliance goals. For example, a European fintech company that is subject to GDPR might use hashing or masking in security logs so that analysts can trace suspicious behavior for a single person. That same company could use full redaction in long-lived application logs to support data minimization and retention policies. Meanwhile, a healthcare SaaS provider might apply redaction to customer support transcripts and hashing to authentication logs. During periodic audits, the provider could then use SDS dashboards as evidence of controls.

As you expand your human name detection coverage, you can treat findings as inputs for PII reviews on a regular cadence. Security and compliance owners can look for increases in findings for specific services, open cases or incidents that link directly to representative findings, and coordinate upstream changes with application teams so that log patterns evolve in step with internal privacy standards.

Start detecting human names in your logs today

Human name detection helps you apply consistent governance to personal names in your logs. By combining a multilayer ML pipeline with configurable actions and centralized findings, the feature helps your teams validate upstream redaction, support compliance efforts, and avoid the operational burden of custom regex-based scanners.

You can enable Sensitive Data Scanner to begin discovering, classifying, and obfuscating sensitive information across your logs, traces, Real User Monitoring (RUM) events, and more. When you’re ready to try human name detection in Datadog sites other than US1-FED, find the Human Name Scanner rule under the PII label in the Scanning Rules Library. To get started with human name detection in US1-FED, join the Preview. We’ll then enable the rule for your organization and help you roll it out.

Check out our SDS documentation about scanning rules for more information. If you don’t already have a Datadog account, you can sign up for a 14-day free trial to get started.