惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

GbyAI
GbyAI
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
S
Securelist
U
Unit 42
The Cloudflare Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
B
Blog
T
Tenable Blog
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
IT之家
IT之家
博客园 - 【当耐特】
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
博客园_首页
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
T
Tor Project blog
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
A
Arctic Wolf
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
V
V2EX
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
V
Visual Studio Blog
月光博客
月光博客
爱范儿
爱范儿
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
美团技术团队
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
H
Heimdal Security Blog
K
KPMG report finds enterprise disconnect between AI and its ROI | CIO

Datadog | The Monitor blog

Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What’s new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis Monitor Aruba Central in Datadog How we centralize and remediate risks with Datadog Case Management Accelerate incident response with Datadog and ServiceNow Monitor your application and network load balancer logs Understanding Karpenter architecture for Kubernetes autoscaling Tools for collecting metrics and logs from Karpenter Monitor Karpenter with Datadog What your product data is actually saying Key metrics for monitoring Karpenter Securing Datadog’s platform in the AI age: The role of observability data Four ways engineering teams use the Datadog MCP Server to power AI agents Approaching your observability migration with the right mindset Meet the new Bits AI SRE: Deeper reasoning, twice as fast Key learnings from the 2026 State of DevSecOps study Use plain English to query your multi-cloud infrastructure in Resource Catalog Simplifying troubleshooting across the user journey with Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Protect your OCI resources with Datadog Cloud Security This Month in Datadog - February 2026 Amazon EC2 security: How misconfigured and public AMIs expand your cloud attack surface Enable end-to-end visibility into your Java apps with a single command Measure and improve mobile app startup performance with Datadog RUM Evaluating our AI Guard application to improve quality and control cost Identify untested code across every level of your codebase Make use of guardrail metrics and stop babysitting your releases Monitor Versa Networks SD-WAN performance in Datadog Improve performance and reliability with APM Recommendations Remediate transitive vulnerabilities faster with Datadog Software Composition Analysis Generate audit-ready vulnerability and compliance reports with Datadog Sheets Monitor Fortinet FortiManager performance in Datadog Improve test coverage across codebases with Datadog Code Coverage Move fast, don’t break things: Consistent testing standards at scale Enrich logs with ServiceNow CMDB context before routing to any SIEM or logging tool Monitor Lustre with Datadog Make faster, better product decisions with Datadog Product Analytics Surface and remediate runtime posture issues with Workload Protection Findings Protect agentic AI applications with Datadog AI Guard How to optimize JavaScript code with CSS Trace Google Pub/Sub workloads in Cloud Run with Datadog How we cut our NLQ agent debugging time from hours to minutes with LLM Observability Debug PostgreSQL query latency faster with EXPLAIN ANALYZE in Datadog Database Monitoring Datadog acquires Propolis Unify and correlate frontend and backend data with retention filters Scale compliance across global frameworks with Datadog Cloud Security Monitor Arista VeloCloud SD-WAN performance with Datadog Building reliable dashboard agents with Datadog LLM Observability Simplify log collection and aggregation for MSSPs with Datadog Observability Pipelines Mitigation for Node.js denial-of-service vulnerability affecting Datadog APM Automate flaky test fixes with the Bits AI Dev Agent and Test Optimization How we built an AI SRE agent that investigates like a team of engineers Datadog integrations 2025 recap: Observability for AI, security, and hybrid cloud Design effective executive dashboards with Datadog Implement dbt data quality checks with dbt-expectations Bring faster visibility into AWS Lambda functions with remote instrumentation Troubleshoot faster with the GitLab Source Code integration in Datadog How Cambia Health Solutions saved $30,000 monthly with Cloud Cost Management and the Datadog Resource Catalog Normalize any logs for Cloud SIEM with Datadog's OCSF processor Optimizing Datadog at scale: Cost-efficient observability at Zendesk Detect, diagnose, and resolve network issues easily with CNM Network Health Securing customer logins with breach intelligence Connect engineering errors to user impact in early-stage products Cilium configuration for Kubernetes operations at scale Designing feedback loops for progressive delivery Ship features faster and safer with Datadog Feature Flags Choosing the right OpenTelemetry Collector distribution Route your monitor alerts with Datadog monitor notification rules Automate Cloud SIEM investigations with Bits AI Security Analyst Cloud threat detection: How to identify risky activity across control and data planes Collecting Kafka performance metrics Monitoring Kafka with Datadog Monitoring Kafka performance metrics
Detect human names in logs with ML in Sensitive Data Scanner
2026-02-02 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog
Pronoy Chaudhuri

Pronoy Chaudhuri

Modern applications generate a constant stream of logs, some of which carry more information than they should. For too many organizations, logs include personally identifiable information (PII) such as customer names that were never meant to leave production systems. Teams try to limit this data exposure by using regular expressions to detect and obfuscate matches, only to discover that names like John O’Connor, Mary-Jane, Jane van der Meer, and A. García slip through. Punctuation, hyphenation, multiword surnames, initials, diacritics, and casing make handcrafted patterns fragile, forcing engineers to tune exceptions while names continue to appear in logs. Additionally, false positive findings for technologies that have human names, such as Cassandra and Jenkins, add to operational friction and hamper observability.

Datadog Sensitive Data Scanner (SDS) human name detection, now generally available for all commercial Datadog sites and available in Preview in US1-FED, helps solve these challenges. Human name detection introduces a built-in, machine learning (ML)–based rule that automatically identifies first, last, and full human names in your application logs. With the Human Name Scanner rule, you can detect and optionally obfuscate names without creating and maintaining a collection of regex patterns. As a result, you can validate upstream redaction, strengthen compliance efforts for standards such as GDPR, and reduce false positives.

In this post, we’ll explore:

How human name detection works

Human name detection uses an ML pipeline that focuses on dynamic log content, which is where PII tends to exist. A fast candidate filter points out tokens that are likely human names, and then a Datadog-hosted ML classifier confirms whether those tokens are names by using context instead of relying on brittle pattern matching. This staged approach to detection helps maintain accuracy at scale without requiring you to operate model infrastructure or maintain custom dictionaries.

After you set up a scanning group that defines what data to scan, you can enable the Human Name Scanner rule from the SDS Scanning Rules Library and select the action that Datadog SDS should take when a match occurs. The following actions are available:

  • Redact: Replace the full matching value with a placeholder.
  • Partially Redact: Replace a specific portion of the matching value.
  • Hash: Produce a deterministic token that enables you to correlate repeated appearances of the matching value across logs without storing the original name.
  • Mask: Obfuscate the matching value, but reveal it to users who have the appropriate permission to unmask it (for example, during security incidents).
Screenshot of a rule configuration with the Human Name Scanner rule enabled and hashing selected.

The following example shows how the Human Name Scanner rule behaves in practice. The screenshot from Datadog Log Management shows a log message that confirms an order for a user named John O'Connor by mentioning John’s name on two occasions. The log message also includes two references to the human-sounding name Ruby: one in the source (ruby) and one in the store_name (Ruby's Vinyls).

Screenshot of a log message that confirms an order by John O’Connor from Ruby’s Vinyls.

Writing a regex pattern that reliably detects the name in this example is difficult because variants such as O'Connor, O’Connor (different apostrophe), and O Connor require multiple alternations. With the Human Name Scanner rule enabled, Datadog SDS detects mentions of the name in the log and applies your configured action while leaving non-sensitive fields intact. The following screenshot shows how human name detection hashes John O. and O'Connor while avoiding false positives by not flagging ruby or Ruby in the same log.

Screenshot of the log message where John O’Connor’s name is hashed with a lengthy alphanumeric identifier.

You can review matches from the Human Name Scanner rule on the SDS Findings page, which aggregates detections by rule and priority so that you can pivot into the underlying logs, verify examples, and create a case or incident when necessary. Because findings are tagged with rule metadata, you can also use log search, monitors, and dashboards to track trends in name detection across services.

Screenshot of a finding by human name detection. The finding provides a list of logs to investigate and notes the impacted services.

Datadog SDS also provides the ability to suppress particular matches if your organization decides to risk-accept specific names, such as company names that resemble human names. You can edit the Human Name Scanner rule to avoid flagging names such as Bauer, which is suppressed in the following screenshot. You can test your new match conditions by pasting in log content to find out how human name detection reacts.

Screenshot of functionality to edit the Human Name Scanner rule to add a suppression.

Best practices for improving PII compliance

With its abilities to identify and obfuscate names, human name detection can help you enhance PII compliance with standards such as GDPR. You can pursue these goals by introducing human name detection in a focused scope where you validate matches, tune actions, and communicate changes before you expand coverage to additional services and environments. A common pattern is to start with a small set of high-risk services that likely process end-user data, configure the Human Name Scanner rule to log findings without redaction, review examples on the SDS Findings page, and then switch those services to redact or hash.

Action selection plays an important role in supporting compliance goals. For example, a European fintech company that is subject to GDPR might use hashing or masking in security logs so that analysts can trace suspicious behavior for a single person. That same company could use full redaction in long-lived application logs to support data minimization and retention policies. Meanwhile, a healthcare SaaS provider might apply redaction to customer support transcripts and hashing to authentication logs. During periodic audits, the provider could then use SDS dashboards as evidence of controls.

As you expand your human name detection coverage, you can treat findings as inputs for PII reviews on a regular cadence. Security and compliance owners can look for increases in findings for specific services, open cases or incidents that link directly to representative findings, and coordinate upstream changes with application teams so that log patterns evolve in step with internal privacy standards.

Start detecting human names in your logs today

Human name detection helps you apply consistent governance to personal names in your logs. By combining a multilayer ML pipeline with configurable actions and centralized findings, the feature helps your teams validate upstream redaction, support compliance efforts, and avoid the operational burden of custom regex-based scanners.

You can enable Sensitive Data Scanner to begin discovering, classifying, and obfuscating sensitive information across your logs, traces, Real User Monitoring (RUM) events, and more. When you’re ready to try human name detection in Datadog sites other than US1-FED, find the Human Name Scanner rule under the PII label in the Scanning Rules Library. To get started with human name detection in US1-FED, join the Preview. We’ll then enable the rule for your organization and help you roll it out.

Check out our SDS documentation about scanning rules for more information. If you don’t already have a Datadog account, you can sign up for a 14-day free trial to get started.