惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

月光博客
月光博客
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
IT之家
IT之家
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
雷峰网
雷峰网
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
量子位
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
V
V2EX
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
B
Blog
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
Jina AI
Jina AI
C
Check Point Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
博客园_首页
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
B
Blog RSS Feed
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
U
Unit 42

Jim Nielsen’s Blog

Do You Prefer Artificial? Bottlenecks Get a Bad Rap Preserving Netlify Analytics Data Beyond 30 Days An Ode to Links Don’t Let Anyone Take Away Your Big Box of Cables The Bulldozing of an Interface Can We Stop With the Uptime Percentages? Nobody Believes It, Everybody Does It My Experience Has Nuance, Yours Is a Data Point A Calendar View For My Blog Have You Heard the Good News About Microlighter? Getting an LLM to Make Me a Tool for Enriching the Color Metadata in My Icon Collection A Sloppy Interface Is a Security Liability  Oops, Should’ve Thought of That Oh Hey, It’s Not Just Me The Fruits of AI A License to Act The AI Aesthetic Can the Tide of AI Investment Life All Boats on the Web? Podcast Notes: Ed Catmull on David Senra Make It Work vs. Make It Good Podcast Notes: Iain McGilchrist on “The Great Simplification” What’s an Icon in 2026? Family Feud: Mac-assed Mac App Edition Making a Shuffle Button This Page Left Intentionally Blank Notes from Bryan Cantrill’s “Intelligence is not Enough” My Om Malik Story Blogging Can Just Be Stating The Obvious Consistency, But in Excellence Not Appearance
Reminder: You Can Stitch Together Lots of Little HTML Pag...
Jim Nielsen · 2026-05-04 · via Jim Nielsen’s Blog

I wrote about building websites with LLMs — (L)ots of (L)ittle ht(M)l page(s) — and I think it’s time for a post-mortem on that approach:

I like it.

I’ve tweaked a few things from that original post but the underlying idea is still the same, which I would describe as:

Avoid in-page interactions that require JavaScript in favor of multi-page navigations that rely on HTML and are enhanced with CSS view transitions (and a dash of JS if/where prudent).

As an example, on my blog I have a “Menu”. It doesn’t “expand” or “slide out” or “pop in” or whatever else you can do with JS. Instead, it navigates to an entirely-new page that is focused on just the menu options of my site.

I say “navigates” because it’s just a link — <a href="/menu/"> — and it functions like a link, but the navigation interaction is enhanced by CSS view transitions.

Have a newer device with a modern browser? Great, you get a nicer effect.

Have an older device, or an older browser, or JS disabled, Et al.? It’ll still work.

If you can follow a link — which is the most fundamental thing a browser can do — it will work.

So how’s it all work under the hood? In essence, all the pages have a link to the menu (except the menu page). When you navigate to the menu, that link is changed to an “X” which “closes” the menu. The closing is still just a link (back to /) but it’s enhanced with JS to actually do a “back” in the browser history. This makes it so “opening/closing” the menu doesn’t add an entry to your browser history.

Screenshot of three mobile screenshots of blog.jim-nielsen.com with highlighted sections indicating where navigational clicks can happen and how they link between eachother.

As a simplified example, the code looks like this:

<!-- Normal page -->
<nav>
  <a href="/menu/">
    <svg>...</svg>
  </a>
</nav>

<!-- Menu page -->
<nav>
  <a href="/" onclick="document.referrer ? history.back() : window.location.href = '/'; return false;">
    <svg>...</svg>
  </a>
</nav>

The document.referrer checks whether we came to this page as a navigation (mostly likely from within the blog itself) or via a direct visit (i.e. somebody typed it into the URL bar, unlikely but possible) which is how I suss out whether there’s a meaningful history.back() run or not.

Here’s a video of how it all works, if that’s your thing:

While this solution seems simplistic, it was not a simple thing to arrive at. It required me to spend time thinking about what was essential to navigation, how that interaction could work across multiple pages, and how I could ensure page size stayed small so the interaction was both fast and robust while remaining intuitive to use.

In other words, the approach shaped the design.

Turns out, if you have a website and you think of the browser as a way to navigate documents — rather than a runtime to execute arbitrary code and fetch, compile, and present them — things can be a lot simpler than our tools often prime us to make them.