惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
博客园_首页
H
Help Net Security
GbyAI
GbyAI
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
V
Visual Studio Blog
The Cloudflare Blog
腾讯CDC
Jina AI
Jina AI
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
月光博客
月光博客
博客园 - 叶小钗
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
B
Blog RSS Feed
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
爱范儿
爱范儿
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
F
Fortinet All Blogs

Jim Nielsen’s Blog

Bottlenecks Get a Bad Rap Preserving Netlify Analytics Data Beyond 30 Days An Ode to Links Don’t Let Anyone Take Away Your Big Box of Cables The Bulldozing of an Interface Can We Stop With the Uptime Percentages? Nobody Believes It, Everybody Does It My Experience Has Nuance, Yours Is a Data Point A Calendar View For My Blog Have You Heard the Good News About Microlighter? Getting an LLM to Make Me a Tool for Enriching the Color Metadata in My Icon Collection A Sloppy Interface Is a Security Liability  Oops, Should’ve Thought of That Oh Hey, It’s Not Just Me The Fruits of AI A License to Act The AI Aesthetic Can the Tide of AI Investment Life All Boats on the Web? Podcast Notes: Ed Catmull on David Senra Make It Work vs. Make It Good Podcast Notes: Iain McGilchrist on “The Great Simplification” What’s an Icon in 2026? Family Feud: Mac-assed Mac App Edition Making a Shuffle Button This Page Left Intentionally Blank Notes from Bryan Cantrill’s “Intelligence is not Enough” My Om Malik Story Blogging Can Just Be Stating The Obvious Full Page Paralysis Being “Good” at Things
Consistency, But in Excellence Not Appearance
Jim Nielsen · 2026-06-23 · via Jim Nielsen’s Blog

Consistency serves a purpose in visual design, but it seems to have become the purpose of a lot of visual design.

Look no further than these evolutions of macOS icons (image courtesy of BasicAppleGuy):

Comparison of Apple app icon designs across three eras, arranged in a grid. The “Original” (skeuomorphic) column shows detailed 3D-style icons for apps like Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, Pages, Motion, Compressor, MainStage, Keynote, Numbers, etc. The “Current” column shows the modern flat/gradient icon style for these apps. And the 'Creator Studio' column shows a unified, dark-background icon set with simplified glyphs in purple, blue, red, green, orange, etc., all for the same set of apps.

The Creator Studio icons are undeniably consistent visually: rounded rectangles, controlled gradients, simplified forms, restrained depth, etc.

In contrast (and by modern standards) the originals seem heretically inconsistent. They lack coherence in visual details like shape, material, and lighting.

But what they lack in visual consistency between one another, they make up for in excellence individually.

In fact, their aversion to familial visual consistency almost seems like an intentional choice — a deliberate augmentation of individual purpose.

What purpose? To be singularly representative and deeply iconic.

Icons that are iconic.

To be iconic, by definition, is to be famously distinctive.

None of the Creator Studio icons, especially when held up as a suite, are iconic. None are atypical, they’re merely typical.

All in pursuit of what, consistency — amongst each other and across platforms — as the overriding goal?

This over-emphasis on “systems” design seems endemic to modern software.

Systems prescribe rules because they are the easiest attributes to document, enforce, and automate — “All icons must use this shape, this lighting, this stroke.”

Excellence, by contrast, is harder to systematize. It requires judgment, taste, care, experience, and a sensitivity to context — all in service of meaning and purpose, not superficial similarity.

When you strive for consistency across a suite, individual elements lose their ability to be exceptional and iconic on their own terms. Consistency for the group becomes a ceiling on individual excellence.

But if you flip that, if you make excellence the goal for each individual element, something interesting can happen: excellence becomes your motif of consistency. It’s no longer a consistency of shapes and gradients, but one of quality and intention that serves a deeper meaning and purpose than superficial visuals.

Give me a consistency of excellence any day over a consistency of appearance.