惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

J
Java Code Geeks
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
GbyAI
GbyAI
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
腾讯CDC
U
Unit 42
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
小众软件
小众软件
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
博客园 - Franky
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
A
About on SuperTechFans
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
D
Docker
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More

Jim Nielsen’s Blog

Do You Prefer Artificial? Bottlenecks Get a Bad Rap Preserving Netlify Analytics Data Beyond 30 Days An Ode to Links Don’t Let Anyone Take Away Your Big Box of Cables The Bulldozing of an Interface Can We Stop With the Uptime Percentages? Nobody Believes It, Everybody Does It My Experience Has Nuance, Yours Is a Data Point A Calendar View For My Blog Have You Heard the Good News About Microlighter? Getting an LLM to Make Me a Tool for Enriching the Color Metadata in My Icon Collection A Sloppy Interface Is a Security Liability  Oops, Should’ve Thought of That Oh Hey, It’s Not Just Me The Fruits of AI A License to Act The AI Aesthetic Can the Tide of AI Investment Life All Boats on the Web? Podcast Notes: Ed Catmull on David Senra Make It Work vs. Make It Good Podcast Notes: Iain McGilchrist on “The Great Simplification” What’s an Icon in 2026? Family Feud: Mac-assed Mac App Edition Making a Shuffle Button This Page Left Intentionally Blank Notes from Bryan Cantrill’s “Intelligence is not Enough” My Om Malik Story Blogging Can Just Be Stating The Obvious Consistency, But in Excellence Not Appearance
Building Software Requires Digestion
Jim Nielsen · 2026-05-13 · via Jim Nielsen’s Blog

Here’s Scott Jenson in his insightful piece “The Ma of a New Machine”:

the chatbot interface [makes us] feel like deep cognitive work is happening. But the interface is fundamentally reactive. It spits complex text at you, you skim it quickly, and you immediately type a reaction to keep the momentum going.

My hypothesis is that the very structure of the chatbot interface (type, read, type again) actively discourages reflection. When you are moving too fast, you get stuck in a groove. You literally need to take a break, step back, and basically step out of this groove so you can view the problem from a new angle. We’ve all walked away from a tough problem only to have the solution arrive unbidden into our thoughts later in the day.

In my decades+ experience designing and developing software, I can’t count the number of times I’ve stepped away from a problem at the computer only to return and find the problem magically resolved in my brain.

But the human-computer interaction of prompting doesn’t encourage the use of that skill in our subconscious.

In fact, I think it actively discourages it (our tools shape us).

Scott talks about this Japanese concept called “Ma” which is about deliberately creating pauses between things. He quotes Studio Ghibli director Hayao Miyazaki who says “if you just have non-stop action with no breathing space at all, it’s just busyness.” Here’s Scott (emphasis mine):

Ma provides a framework for understanding that a pause is not a lack of work

As humans we need pauses. We need space to breathe. We need time to digest.

Pausing, breathing, synthesizing, digesting — these are all necessary work.

“Digestion” is an interesting word here.

Putting food in your body is merely the beginning of feeding yourself. Our bodies must digest that food, break it down, absorb it, and get rid of the waste.

But that’s all happening mostly without our attentive oversight, so I guess it’s not “real” work — right?

Wrong.

Building good, healthy software requires digestion.