惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

罗磊的独立博客
美团技术团队
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
月光博客
月光博客
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
The Cloudflare Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
博客园_首页
博客园 - Franky
博客园 - 司徒正美
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
爱范儿
爱范儿
Jina AI
Jina AI
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
雷峰网
雷峰网
IT之家
IT之家
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
博客园 - 聂微东
小众软件
小众软件
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
V
V2EX

Microsoft Security Blog

Microsoft named a Leader in the 2026 IDC MarketScape for MDR/MXDR for the Enterprise  | Microsoft Security Blog DeadLock ransomware: Breaking down a Rust-based encryptor with decentralized recovery infrastructure | Microsoft Security Blog ​​Microsoft named a Leader in the KuppingerCole Leadership Compass for Cloud Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) | Microsoft Security Blog From open lures to cloaked gates: How a macOS ClickFix campaign learned to hide | Microsoft Security Blog ChainDrop supply chain compromise: Anatomy of a self-propagating worm | Microsoft Security Blog Advance Zero Trust for AI: New tools and guidance to secure AI agents and DevSecOps | Microsoft Security Blog 128 Seconds to disruption: Microsoft Defender stops ransomware at QNET  | Microsoft Security Blog CaptiveCrunch: Midnight Blizzard targets travelers worldwide for malware delivery and credential theft | Microsoft Security Blog ​​​​What’s new in Microsoft Security: July 2026 | Microsoft Security Blog ​​Better security starts with better questions | Microsoft Security Blog Rethinking security for the age of AI - The Official Microsoft Blog Email threat landscape: Q2 2026 trends and insights | Microsoft Security Blog Real world incident response: Microsoft and AXA XL strengthen cyber resilience | Microsoft Security Blog Microsoft at Black Hat USA 2026: Defending trust in the age of AI and supply chain attacks | Microsoft Security Blog ACR Stealer: Two observed intrusion chains amid increased threat activity | Microsoft Security Blog Least privilege for AI agents: Identity, access, and tool binding | Microsoft Security Blog Unpacking the AsyncAPI npm supply chain compromise and import-time payload delivery | Microsoft Security Blog Turning threat intelligence into decisive action with Defender Experts | Microsoft Security Blog Defending SaaS-based applications against ShinyHunters OAuth abuse | Microsoft Security Blog Microsoft Entra ID security updates: Passkeys are the default authentication method in Entra ID | Microsoft Security Blog Securing our future: July 2026 progress report on Microsoft's Secure Future Initiative | Microsoft Security Blog GigaWiper: Anatomy of a destructive backdoor assembled from multiple malware | Microsoft Security Blog Protecting Microsoft at AI speed: How SFI proactively hardens our cloud   | Microsoft Security Blog 5 insights from Frost & Sullivan’s 2025 Frost Radar™ for Cloud Security Posture Management | Microsoft Security Blog Improving security posture across the Microsoft partner ecosystem | Microsoft Security Blog Microsoft named a leader in the Frost Radar for cloud and application runtime security | Microsoft Security Blog Accelerating the quantum-safe timeline | Microsoft Security Blog ​​What’s new in Microsoft Security: June 2026 | Microsoft Security Blog Securing AI agents: When AI tools move from reading to acting | Microsoft Security Blog Chromium extension uses AI‑related branding to redirect browser search | Microsoft Security Blog
Enhancing AI security through global AI red teaming | Mic...
Ram Shankar Siva Kumar · 2026-07-28 · via Microsoft Security Blog

Most AI safety testing still happens inside the walls of individual organizations. That has resulted in a fundamental disconnect: many of the highest-risk failure modes in modern AI systems require deep domain expertise, multilingual context, or regional understanding that no single internal team can fully replicate on its own. 

As frontier models become more capable, the attack surface expands with them. AI red teaming is no longer just about prompt injection or content safety edge cases. It increasingly involves security operations, misuse scenarios, multilingual harms, alignment failures, and domain-specific abuse patterns that can vary significantly across geographies and languages. 

Microsoft’s AI Red Team has observed that meaningful testing of advanced AI systems- and models similarly requires broader participation from researchers and practitioners who operate outside traditional corporate security boundaries. To address that gap, today we are announcing the External Red Team Alliance (EXTRA), a formalized global extension of Microsoft’s AI Red Team designed to support and encourage external expertise to advance AI safety and security testing.  We are proud to share we are funding the development of new AI safety assessments on six continents through unrestricted gifts. 

Building a global alliance

EXTRA is a two-part initiative focused on expanding AI safety research and strengthening external collaboration. 

The first component supports a global academic network focused on advancing AI safety and security research. Microsoft’s AI Red Team has provided unrestricted gifts to 18 university labs spanning six continents. The goal is intentionally broad: support researchers who are already investigating difficult, unresolved questions in AI safety and help them continue pushing that work forward independently. 

Some of the supporting institutions include: 

“Academic research is critical to understanding the cyber security landscape and finding solutions that work for all of society – and partnerships like this with industry are essential to delivering on that promise. Through partnerships, civil society and public institutions researchers gain access to frontier technology to understand how models work and bring their expertise to the task of determining risk and developing more effective countermeasures for the benefit of society as a whole.”

Nicolas Papernot, professor, University of Toronto. 

The second component of EXTRA focuses on operational collaboration. Microsoft is building a distributed network of specialists who can participate directly in red teaming highly specialized areas where deeper expertise is required. That includes researchers, practitioners, and regional experts who understand specific attack classes, languages, cultural contexts, or technical domains that internal teams may not fully cover alone. 

Beyond expanding participation, EXTRA is also intended to help advance the science of AI safety evaluation. By bringing together academic researchers, security practitioners, and domain experts from around the world, the initiative aims to contribute to the development of more robust methodologies and testing practices for increasingly capable AI systems. Today’s cybersecurity ecosystem depends on coordinated vulnerability research, responsible disclosure programs, academic inquiry, and global communities of independent security researchers who routinely identify risks that vendors alone would not find. Likewise, advancing AI safety will benefit from ongoing contributions from experts across institutions, disciplines, and geographies to identify emerging threats, strengthen safeguards, and improve evaluation practices. 

“As frontier model capabilities advance, they create new risk opportunities, particularly in low-resource settings. Partnerships, such as this EXTRA, bring greater attention to the study of the local risk landscape and can enable broader impact of the work carried out around the globe in smaller academic settings.”

Balaraman Ravindran, head of the Robert Bosch Centre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (RBC-DSAI) at IIT Madras. 

What the research focuses on

The research areas funded through EXTRA reflect several of the emerging areas Microsoft’s AI Red Team continues to encounter when evaluating advanced AI systems. 

Some universities are examining the cybersecurity implications of AI systems themselves — including how models can be attacked, manipulated, or abused in operational environments. Other labs are exploring the inverse problem: how AI systems can assist defenders and improve cyber operations. 

The structure of the program is intentional. The funding is unrestricted because the objective is not to direct research outcomes toward product requirements or predefined deliverables. The goal is to strengthen independent safety research capacity globally and create stronger long-term collaboration between academia and operational AI security teams. 

Why this matters

“Managing frontier AI risk requires more than internal safeguards. It requires continuous engagement with experts who understand how these systems behave across different technical, linguistic, and cultural contexts. EXTRA reflects Microsoft’s broader Frontier Governance Framework approach: combining rigorous internal governance with external support and collaboration to better identify, assess, and mitigate emerging risks as AI capabilities advance. By supporting independent research and building stronger connections with universities and specialists around the world, we are helping strengthen the broader ecosystem needed for trustworthy and secure AI development,” says Natasha Crampton, Chief Responsible AI Officer, Microsoft 

Governments too are increasingly focused on understanding the capabilities and security implications of frontier AI systems to strengthen resilience. But just as coordinated international research helped unlock the benefits of previous technological revolutions, diverse expertise from researchers and practitioners around the world is essential to identify emerging threats, improve defenses, and build greater confidence in AI systems.   

“Frontier AI is already shaping the future of both cybersecurity and national security. Understanding how these systems can be misused, and identifying risks before they become real-world threats, requires expertise that spans institutions, disciplines, and borders.” says Mike Yeh, VP & Deputy General Counsel, Customer Security and Trust, Microsoft 

AI red teaming is becoming more interdisciplinary, multilingual, and globally distributed. The expertise needed to identify meaningful failure modes increasingly lives across universities, independent research communities, and regional specialists. 

EXTRA reflects a practical shift in how AI security testing must operate going forward. External expertise is no longer supplemental to red teaming; in many cases, it is essential. 

Microsoft would like to thank these people for their important contributions with this project: Steph Ballard, Blake Bullwinkel, Nicholas Butts, Janelle Bryant, Kaja Ciglic, Hector de Rivoire, Eugenia Kim, Amanda Minnich, Shujaat Mirza, Jingxia Ni, Saphir Qi, Giorgio Severi, Hilary Solan, Hiwot Tesfaye, Sam Vaughan, Marguerita Wicklander, and the many teams at these schools around the world who helped coordinate