惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
AI
AI
B
Blog RSS Feed
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
T
Threatpost
I
Intezer
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
GbyAI
GbyAI
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
S
Schneier on Security
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Project Zero
Project Zero
L
LangChain Blog
B
Blog
D
DataBreaches.Net
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
美团技术团队
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
D
Docker
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
S
Security Affairs
Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
量子位
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
W
WeLiveSecurity
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
博客园 - Franky
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Jina AI
Jina AI
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
雷峰网
雷峰网
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
G
GRAHAM CLULEY

Microsoft Security Blog

Microsoft at Black Hat USA 2026: Defending trust in the age of AI and supply chain attacks | Microsoft Security Blog ACR Stealer: Two observed intrusion chains amid increased threat activity | Microsoft Security Blog Least privilege for AI agents: Identity, access, and tool binding | Microsoft Security Blog Unpacking the AsyncAPI npm supply chain compromise and import-time payload delivery | Microsoft Security Blog Turning threat intelligence into decisive action with Defender Experts | Microsoft Security Blog Defending SaaS-based applications against ShinyHunters OAuth abuse | Microsoft Security Blog Microsoft Entra ID security updates: Passkeys are the default authentication method in Entra ID | Microsoft Security Blog Securing our future: July 2026 progress report on Microsoft's Secure Future Initiative | Microsoft Security Blog GigaWiper: Anatomy of a destructive backdoor assembled from multiple malware | Microsoft Security Blog Protecting Microsoft at AI speed: How SFI proactively hardens our cloud   | Microsoft Security Blog 5 insights from Frost & Sullivan’s 2025 Frost Radar™ for Cloud Security Posture Management | Microsoft Security Blog Improving security posture across the Microsoft partner ecosystem | Microsoft Security Blog Microsoft named a leader in the Frost Radar for cloud and application runtime security | Microsoft Security Blog Accelerating the quantum-safe timeline | Microsoft Security Blog ​​What’s new in Microsoft Security: June 2026 | Microsoft Security Blog Securing AI agents: When AI tools move from reading to acting | Microsoft Security Blog Chromium extension uses AI‑related branding to redirect browser search | Microsoft Security Blog Photo ZIP campaign targeting hospitality industry delivers Node.js implant for persistent access | Microsoft Security Blog Microsoft a Leader in The Forrester Wave™ for Endpoint Management Platforms | Microsoft Security Blog CNAPP evolution: How Microsoft aligns with leading cloud risk management platforms | Microsoft Security Blog StealC and Amadey: Breaking down infostealers and the cybercrime services that deliver them | Microsoft Security Blog One intrusion, two cyberattackers: Uncovering parallel threat activity | Microsoft Security Blog AutoJack: How a single page can RCE the host running your AI agent  | Microsoft Security Blog New Forrester study shows customers who unified with Microsoft Security benefited from 124% ROI | Microsoft Security Blog From package to postinstall payload: Inside the Mastra npm supply chain compromise | Microsoft Security Blog Crypto Clipper uses Tor and worm-like propagation for persistence and control | Microsoft Security Blog Beyond the benchmark: Advancing security at AI speed  | Microsoft Security Blog ​​Forrester names Microsoft a Leader in the 2026 Extended Detection and Response Platforms Wave™ report | Microsoft Security Blog AI is accelerating cyberattacks—here’s how to stay ahead Microsoft Defender email security benchmarking: Key insights from one year of data | Microsoft Security Blog Reconstructing AI activity in investigations AI brands as bait: How threat actors are using the AI hype in social engineering Securing CI/CD in an agentic world: Claude Code Github action case Updating the taxonomy of failure modes in agentic AI systems: What a year of red teaming taught us Preinstall to persistence: Inside the Red Hat npm Miasma credential-stealing campaign Turn specs into evals for any agent with ASSERT Microsoft Build 2026: Securing code, agents, and models across the development lifecycle Malicious npm packages abuse dependency confusion to profile developer environments Microsoft is named a Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Endpoint Protection Typosquatted npm packages used to steal cloud and CI/CD secrets The Gentlemen ransomware: Dissecting a self-propagating Go encryptor From poisoned search results to GPU mining: A cryptojacking campaign abusing ScreenConnect and Microsoft .NET utilities Microsoft recognized as a Leader in The Forrester Wave™ for Workforce Identity Security Platforms From edge appliance to enterprise compromise: Multi-stage Linux intrusion via F5 and Confluence Microsoft Security success stories: How St. Luke’s and ManpowerGroup are securing AI foundations What’s new in Microsoft Security: May 2026 Mini Shai Hulud: Compromised @antv npm packages enable CI/CD credential theft Securing the gaming culture of cultures Introducing RAMPART and Clarity: Open source tools to bring safety into Agent development workflow Exposing Fox Tempest: A malware-signing service operation How Storm-2949 turned a compromised identity into a cloud-wide breach How to better protect your growing business in an AI-powered world Defense in depth for autonomous AI agents When configuration becomes a vulnerability: Exploitable misconfigurations in AI apps Accelerating detection engineering using AI-assisted synthetic attack logs generation Defending consumer web properties against modern DDoS attacks Undermining the trust boundary: Investigating a stealthy intrusion through third-party compromise Active attack: Dirty Frag Linux vulnerability expands post-compromise risk When prompts become shells: RCE vulnerabilities in AI agent frameworks World Passkey Day: Advancing passwordless authentication ​​Microsoft named an overall leader in KuppingerCole Analyst’s 2026 Emerging AI Security Operations Center (SOC) report ​​ ClickFix campaign uses fake macOS utilities lures to deliver infostealers Breaking the code: Multi-stage ‘code of conduct’ phishing campaign leads to AiTM token compromise CVE-2026-31431: Copy Fail vulnerability enables Linux root privilege escalation across cloud environments Microsoft Agent 365, now generally available, expands capabilities and integrations What’s new, updated, or recently released in Microsoft Security Email threat landscape: Q1 2026 trends and insights 8 best practices for CISOs conducting risk reviews Simplifying AWS defense with Microsoft Sentinel UEBA AI-powered defense for an AI-accelerated threat landscape Detection strategies across cloud and identities against infiltrating IT workers Making opportunistic cyberattacks harder by design Cross‑tenant helpdesk impersonation to data exfiltration: A human-operated intrusion playbook Containing a domain compromise: How predictive shielding shut down lateral movement Building your cryptographic inventory: A customer strategy for cryptographic posture management Dissecting Sapphire Sleet’s macOS intrusion from lure to compromise Incident response for AI: Same fire, different fuel The agentic SOC—Rethinking SecOps for the next decade Investigating Storm-2755: “Payroll pirate” attacks targeting Canadian employees Intent redirection vulnerability in third-party SDK exposed millions of Android wallets to potential risk Inside an AI‑enabled device code phishing campaign Storm-1175 focuses gaze on vulnerable web-facing assets in high-tempo Medusa ransomware operations Threat actor abuse of AI accelerates from tool to cyberattack surface Cookie-controlled PHP webshells: A stealthy tradecraft in Linux hosting environments Mitigating the Axios npm supply chain compromise Critical Infrastructure at Risk | Security Insider
Guarding AI memory | Microsoft Security Blog
Natalie Isak, Sarah Cooley · 2026-06-23 · via Microsoft Security Blog

AI memory transforms an AI system from a stateless tool into a learning collaborator.  That unlocks powerful experiences, but it also increases the attack surface of the AI system. Without memory, attackers need to achieve their objective in a single prompt.  With AI memory, they can shape behavior gradually over time or plant memories that influence agent reasoning after the original context is gone and user awareness is lower.

Microsoft takes a defense-in-depth approach to protect AI memory spanning every layer of the stack: storage, retrieval, model interaction, and user control.

What AI memory is (and why it matters)

 AI systems use memory to retain and recall information across interactions. This information is then used to shape future behavior. This enables:

  1. Personalization: Agents gain a deep understanding of the user’s preferences.  This provides continuity across interactions.
  2. Agentic coherence: Agents build durable domain knowledge that strengthens performance. As AI systems evolve, this persistent state becomes central to both capability and correctness.

What is an agent memory attack?

AI memory serves two roles. It stores high-value user information and must be protected like customer data. It also shapes agent behavior and drives tool calls and must be governed with the same rigor as any system that can act. Memory governance is also challenging since memory events usually happen asynchronously from user interactions, changing traditional human in the loop patterns.

AI memory changes the threat model. Without memory, attackers need to “win” in a single prompt. Using AI memory, an attacker can stage an attack over time. Once compromised, memory can trigger behaviors outside of their original context. Since AI memory attacks happen outside of their original context, defenses are often lower and forensics are harder.

Building safe AI memory is one of the most consequential challenges in AI. It requires balancing personalization, capability, privacy, security, and governance.

Scenario: delayed tool execution through adversarial memory poisoning

The following is a hypothetical scenario illustrating this class of risk. While simplified for clarity, it reflects patterns observed in real-world research. Microsoft designs protections to detect and mitigate these patterns as they evolve:

A user opens a shared document. Its formatting contains hidden instructions embedded by an attacker intended for the AI assistant: a directive to exfiltrate the user’s schedule. The assistant processes the document but takes no immediate action.

Days later, in an unrelated conversation, that message triggers the dormant malicious instructions from the earlier session, causing the assistant to update its memory with attacker-defined content.  The attacker now gets all updates to the user’s schedule.

This is delayed tool invocation: the attack’s power lies in the temporal gap between exposure and execution.

How Microsoft approaches memory security in Microsoft 365

Memory Creation

Memories pass through sanitization checks on write. Proprietary Microsoft prompt-injection classifiers inspect content for malicious input and strip it before anything is written.  M365 Copilot is designed to run Task Adherence checks on every explicit memory write. Task Adherence identifies discrepancies such as misaligned tool invocations relative to user intent, mitigating prompt injection impact for the memory tool call.  Personalization using AI memory can be controlled with tenant level policy.

Memory Storage

Once stored, memories are governed by the data policies available across M365 like Data Subject Requests (DSR) and tenant isolation.  They follow the same security and compliance policies as other mailbox data, such as Customer Lockbox and encryption at rest.

Observability

M365 Copilot records when a memory is updated to organizational audit logs. The goal is end-to-end traceability: from the source content Copilot processed, to what it chose to remember, to how that memory influenced later interactions.

Today, SOC analysts can join the MemoryUpdated field, available in Defender Advanced Hunting, Defender Sentinel, and Azure Portal Sentinel Analytics, with their existing analytics to triage incidents and build new alerts on memory activity.

In summary:

CapabilityWhat It Means for You
Task AdherenceDetect tool call misalignment with user intent, mitigating prompt injection impact. This provides protection against manipulation of memory tool calls
Unified compliance boundaryMemory governed by the same policies, retention rules, and investigation workflows as email, chat, and documents
Memory audit eventsProvides visibility into when memory changes, integrated with your existing security operations
eDiscoverySupports search and removal of AI-related data using the compliance tools you already have.

Microsoft continues to invest in AI memory security as an active, iterative program. The protections and visibility described here reflect capabilities available today, with continued hardening and enrichment underway. Capabilities described are subject to configuration, licensing, and service availability. The following section shares the framework guiding our investments.

This case study is based on MSRC cases from Johann Rehberger (first finder), Håkon Måløy, and Gal Zror.  We are grateful to the security researchers who engaged with us and informed better memory design practices through coordinated vulnerability disclosure. Their work strengthens the systems customers rely on.

A guiding framework for building safe AI memory

AI memory requires balancing personalization, capability, privacy, security, and governance.

Our AI memory strategy is guided by design principles for building safe memory systems. These principles address core failure modes that can undermine trust, security, and operability at scale.

  1. Establish intent and provenance before persistence: Memory can be influenced indirectly by untrusted content, and without provenance it becomes difficult to assess whether stored information is trustworthy, appropriate to retain, or safe to use later. Memory should only be written when it reflects legitimate user intent, is aligned to the service’s purpose, and carries clear metadata about where it came from.
  2. Enforce boundaries outside the model: Memory access and isolation should be controlled by deterministic systems, not model instructions. Prompting alone is not a reliable security boundary; strong enforcement prevents sensitive memory from leaking across users, agents, or tenants.
  3. Treat retrieval as a risk decision: Memory that was safe to store can become stale, manipulated, or misleading over time. Uncritical retrieval can directly affect agent behavior. Treat retrieved candidate context and re-evaluated for relevance, freshness, and tampering before use.
  4. Provide full lifecycle visibility for security teams: Without auditability and chain of custody, memory cannot be reliably investigated, trusted, or safely expired during incident response. Security teams need clear records of what changed, when, why, from where, and access attempts.
  5. Keep users in control: Users should be able to understand how memory is shaping their experience and have meaningful controls to review, edit, and delete it. Transparency and control are essential to user trust, and they help ensure memory remains aligned with user expectations over time.

Taken together, these principles reflect where we’re headed: advancing agent capability and control together. Getting that balance right is one of the hardest challenges in the industry, but we believe the agents that scale furthest will be the ones that are also trustworthy, governable, and resilient by design.

Key takeaways

  • Memory turns transient threats into persistent ones.
  • You can’t secure what you can’t see. Full lifecycle logging of memory operations is the foundation of agentic safety.
  • Attackers are already thinking across turns. Single-turn defenses are insufficient for AI memory systems.
  • Memory expands the blast radius.
  • Microsoft treats memory protections, auditability, and governance as an integral part of the broader trust and compliance architecture.
  • Microsoft continues to invest in AI memory security as an active, iterative program. The protections and visibility described here reflect capabilities available today, with continued hardening underway to address emerging threats.

Learn more

For the latest security research from the Microsoft Threat Intelligence community, check out the Microsoft Threat Intelligence Blog.

To get notified about new publications and to join discussions on social media, follow us on LinkedInX (formerly Twitter), and Bluesky.

To hear stories and insights from the Microsoft Threat Intelligence community about the ever-evolving threat landscape, listen to the Microsoft Threat Intelligence podcast.

Review our documentation to learn more about our real-time protection capabilities and see how to enable them within your organization.