惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

D
Docker
小众软件
小众软件
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
月光博客
月光博客
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
V
V2EX
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
博客园 - Franky
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Jina AI
Jina AI
博客园 - 聂微东
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
量子位
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
博客园_首页

Help Net Security

ChatGPT advanced account security adds passkeys and hardware keys Week in review: High-severity LPE vulnerability in the Linux kernel, cPanel 0-day exploited for months Automating Pentest Delivery: A Step-by-Step Guide - PlexTrac Open-source privacy proxy masks PII before prompts reach external AI services Shadow AI risks deepen as 31% of users get no employer training Identity is the control plane for distributed infrastructure AI traffic is getting bigger, louder, and less predictable New infosec products of the month: April 2026 cPanel zero-day exploited for months before patch release (CVE-2026-41940) Cisco releases open-source toolkit for verifying AI model lineage Met Police face criticism for using AI to spy on their own officers Nine-year-old Linux kernel flaw enables reliable local privilege escalation (CVE-2026-31431) Hacker with a special interest in breaching sports institutions ends behind bars - Help Net Security IP Fabric MCP server adds governance and control to enterprise AIOps workflows - Help Net Security Aqua Compass MCP server enables real-time investigation and containment of runtime threats - Help Net Security Google brings instant email verification to Android, no OTP needed - Help Net Security If cyber espionage via HDMI worries you, NCSC built a device to stop it - Help Net Security Apple fixes iPhone bug that let FBI retrieve deleted Signal messages(CVE-2026-28950) - Help Net Security GopherWhisper APT group hides command and control traffic in Slack and Discord - Help Net Security OpenAI tackles a bad habit people have when interacting with AI - Help Net Security A year in, Zoom's CISO reflects on balancing security and business - Help Net Security Scenario: Open-source framework for automated AI app red-teaming - Help Net Security GDPR works, but only where someone enforces it - Help Net Security Ransomware, fraud, and lawsuits drive cyber insurance claims to new peaks - Help Net Security Google’s Workspace Intelligence promises privacy while running on your data - Help Net Security Cyberattack on French government agency triggers phishing alert - Help Net Security Claude Mythos finds 271 Firefox flaws, Mozilla believes zero-days are numbered - Help Net Security Prove Identity Platform connects verification, authentication, and fraud prevention - Help Net Security New Mirai variants target routers and DVRs in parallel campaigns - Help Net Security Acronis GenAI Protection gives MSPs control over AI usage and data risks - Help Net Security
ThreatModeler introduces Nexus to automate threat modelin...
Industry News · 2026-06-26 · via Help Net Security

ThreatModeler has announced the general availability of ThreatModeler Nexus, an agentic threat modeling platform that brings governed, architecture-aware security to the way modern software is actually built. As AI writes a growing share of production code, the question is no longer whether to threat model, but where and when. ThreatModeler Nexus answers that with a platform built to threat model everything, starting wherever a team already is.

ThreatModeler Nexus pairs a multi-agent system with a deterministic framework, so AI accelerates the work while the platform governs the outcome. A System Mapping Agent builds a system map from architecture artifacts or infers one directly from code.

A Graph Agent grounds that work in each customer’s environment. A Reporting Agent produces audit-ready evidence. All three operate on the Secure Design Graph, the connected representation of components, threats, controls, and compliance mappings that makes the platform a system of record rather than a generator of one-time answers.

The Secure Design Graph is also the answer to what the ThreatModeler and IriusRisk merger created. Neither company alone held the full depth of curated threat, control, and compliance intelligence the Graph now consolidates. ThreatModeler Nexus is the platform built on that combined substrate, and it carries the discipline both companies are known for: invisible to developers in the IDE, native to architects as a secure design control plane, and summarized as enterprise risk for security leaders.

“This is the platform the merger was for,” said Kevin Gallagher, Chief Executive Officer at ThreatModeler. “Two companies brought together a decade of work each, and the result is a Secure Design Graph no one else can rebuild from the outside. Launching it alongside partners across delivery and the public sector is the clearest signal of where this company is headed.”

“Finding flaws in code is cheap now. A frontier model can do it in minutes,” said Ben Oster, Chief Product Officer at ThreatModeler. “The hard part moved to confirming what actually matters, catching what is missing, and proving it to the board. That takes a governed framework and a system of record, not another prompt. That is what ThreatModeler Nexus is built to be.”

ThreatModeler is also actively working with Knox Systems toward achieving FedRAMP authorization, bringing governed agentic threat modeling to federal agencies and the regulated organizations that hold themselves to the same standard.

“Federal teams are under real pressure to adopt AI in security without giving up audibility or control,” said Hemant Baidwan, Executive CISO at Knox. “Achieving FedRAMP authorization through working with Knox allows agencies to bring emerging security capabilities into environments where every decision has to be defensible.”

Enterprises already run ThreatModeler at scale. A global financial services firm reduced threat modeling effort by 50 percent. The platform draws on more than a decade of curated research and 13 granted patents, with 3,500+ security requirements, 1,500+ catalogued threats, 3,000+ modeled components, and 180+ compliance frameworks behind every model.

Recent industry research underscores the timing: for AI-generated code, threat modeling happens before the code is written 31 percent of the time, during 45 percent, and after 24 percent. (Source: Hanover Research, 2026, n=250.)