惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
K
KPMG report finds enterprise disconnect between AI and its ROI | CIO
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
S
Secure Thoughts
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog
W
WeLiveSecurity
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
G
Google Developers Blog
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
月光博客
月光博客
H
Help Net Security
PCI Perspectives
PCI Perspectives
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
Project Zero
Project Zero
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
L
LangChain Blog
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
V
V2EX
I
Intezer
H
Hacker News: Front Page
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
博客园 - Franky
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
博客园 - 【当耐特】
美团技术团队
Schneier on Security
Schneier on Security
D
Docker
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity

Datadog | The Monitor blog

Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What’s new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis Monitor Aruba Central in Datadog How we centralize and remediate risks with Datadog Case Management Accelerate incident response with Datadog and ServiceNow Monitor your application and network load balancer logs Understanding Karpenter architecture for Kubernetes autoscaling Tools for collecting metrics and logs from Karpenter Monitor Karpenter with Datadog What your product data is actually saying Key metrics for monitoring Karpenter Securing Datadog’s platform in the AI age: The role of observability data Four ways engineering teams use the Datadog MCP Server to power AI agents Approaching your observability migration with the right mindset Meet the new Bits AI SRE: Deeper reasoning, twice as fast Key learnings from the 2026 State of DevSecOps study Use plain English to query your multi-cloud infrastructure in Resource Catalog Simplifying troubleshooting across the user journey with Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Protect your OCI resources with Datadog Cloud Security This Month in Datadog - February 2026 Amazon EC2 security: How misconfigured and public AMIs expand your cloud attack surface Enable end-to-end visibility into your Java apps with a single command Measure and improve mobile app startup performance with Datadog RUM Evaluating our AI Guard application to improve quality and control cost Identify untested code across every level of your codebase Make use of guardrail metrics and stop babysitting your releases Monitor Versa Networks SD-WAN performance in Datadog Improve performance and reliability with APM Recommendations Remediate transitive vulnerabilities faster with Datadog Software Composition Analysis Generate audit-ready vulnerability and compliance reports with Datadog Sheets Monitor Fortinet FortiManager performance in Datadog Improve test coverage across codebases with Datadog Code Coverage Move fast, don’t break things: Consistent testing standards at scale Enrich logs with ServiceNow CMDB context before routing to any SIEM or logging tool Monitor Lustre with Datadog Make faster, better product decisions with Datadog Product Analytics Surface and remediate runtime posture issues with Workload Protection Findings Protect agentic AI applications with Datadog AI Guard How to optimize JavaScript code with CSS Trace Google Pub/Sub workloads in Cloud Run with Datadog Detect human names in logs with ML in Sensitive Data Scanner How we cut our NLQ agent debugging time from hours to minutes with LLM Observability Debug PostgreSQL query latency faster with EXPLAIN ANALYZE in Datadog Database Monitoring Datadog acquires Propolis Unify and correlate frontend and backend data with retention filters Scale compliance across global frameworks with Datadog Cloud Security Monitor Arista VeloCloud SD-WAN performance with Datadog Building reliable dashboard agents with Datadog LLM Observability Simplify log collection and aggregation for MSSPs with Datadog Observability Pipelines Mitigation for Node.js denial-of-service vulnerability affecting Datadog APM Automate flaky test fixes with the Bits AI Dev Agent and Test Optimization How we built an AI SRE agent that investigates like a team of engineers Datadog integrations 2025 recap: Observability for AI, security, and hybrid cloud Design effective executive dashboards with Datadog Implement dbt data quality checks with dbt-expectations Bring faster visibility into AWS Lambda functions with remote instrumentation Troubleshoot faster with the GitLab Source Code integration in Datadog How Cambia Health Solutions saved $30,000 monthly with Cloud Cost Management and the Datadog Resource Catalog Normalize any logs for Cloud SIEM with Datadog's OCSF processor Optimizing Datadog at scale: Cost-efficient observability at Zendesk Detect, diagnose, and resolve network issues easily with CNM Network Health Connect engineering errors to user impact in early-stage products Cilium configuration for Kubernetes operations at scale Designing feedback loops for progressive delivery Ship features faster and safer with Datadog Feature Flags Choosing the right OpenTelemetry Collector distribution Route your monitor alerts with Datadog monitor notification rules Automate Cloud SIEM investigations with Bits AI Security Analyst Cloud threat detection: How to identify risky activity across control and data planes Collecting Kafka performance metrics Monitoring Kafka with Datadog Monitoring Kafka performance metrics
Detect runtime threats in Python Lambda functions with Datadog AAP | Datadog
Florentin Labelle · 2026-04-14 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog

Python AWS Lambda functions are ephemeral and highly distributed, which creates security visibility gaps that traditional perimeter defenses and proxy-based controls struggle to fill. Techniques such as credential stuffing, SQL injection, and server-side request forgery (SSRF) can look like legitimate application traffic, making them difficult to identify without visibility inside the application itself.

To help solve this challenge, Datadog App and API Protection (AAP) now extends full in-process application security monitoring to Python Lambda functions. By integrating directly with your application runtime through Datadog tracing libraries, AAP provides deeper insight into how requests interact with your code. This in-process visibility enables you to detect exploit attempts, correlate them with vulnerable code paths, and respond with higher confidence.

In this post, we’ll explore how AAP helps you:

  • Increase visibility in Lambda environments

  • Detect successful injection attacks with Exploit Prevention

  • Identify and respond to account takeover attempts

Increase visibility in Lambda environments

Traditional approaches to securing serverless applications rely on proxies or external web application firewalls (WAFs) to inspect incoming traffic. Although these approaches can identify known attack patterns, they lack visibility into how requests are processed when they reach your application. Without runtime visibility, teams struggle to determine whether an attack succeeded or which part of their code was affected.

Previously, AAP for Lambda used a language-agnostic approach by running a WAF within the Datadog Lambda Extension. As shown in the following diagram, this proxy-based model inspects requests before they reach the function but can’t observe execution within the runtime itself.

Diagram showing proxy-based security inspection outside the Lambda runtime before requests reach application code.

AAP now integrates directly into the Python runtime by using the Datadog tracing library. This enhancement shifts security monitoring into the application process, where AAP can observe function calls, the request context, and execution paths in real time.

Diagram showing in-process security monitoring inside the Lambda runtime with direct visibility into application execution.

This architectural change aligns how AAP operates in serverless environments with its implementation in other environments by embedding the same security engine in the application runtime. As a result, teams can adopt new detection capabilities more quickly and gain consistent visibility across their services. The change also enables AAP to capture application-level context, such as user actions and function calls, that external tools cannot access.

Detect successful injection attacks with Exploit Prevention

Detecting attack attempts is useful, but understanding whether they succeeded is critical. Many injection attacks become meaningful only when untrusted input reaches vulnerable code during execution. Network-layer monitoring can’t determine whether that condition has occurred.

Exploit Prevention, a feature of AAP, brings runtime application self-protection (RASP) capabilities to Python Lambda functions. Exploit Prevention uses instrumentation from the Datadog tracing library to analyze how untrusted data flows through your application and determine whether an exploit has occurred.

This approach enables detection of common injection attacks, including SSRF, shell injection, SQL injection, and local file inclusion. Instead of relying solely on request signatures, Exploit Prevention correlates incoming request data with function arguments and execution behavior. As a result, it can distinguish between benign input and true exploitation attempts.

Because Exploit Prevention ties detections to execution context, security signals include detailed stack traces that show exactly where and how the exploit occurred. These traces make it easier to investigate incidents, prioritize remediation, and reduce false positives that can arise from surface-level inspection.

Security trace showing a confirmed SQL injection attempt with request context and affected code path.

Identify and respond to account takeover attempts

Account takeover (ATO) attacks often unfold across multiple requests and sessions, making them difficult to detect with stateless monitoring. In serverless environments, this challenge is amplified because each invocation is isolated and short-lived.

Datadog’s Lambda library for Python enables your application to emit authentication-related events, such as user.login and session.create, directly from your business logic. By capturing these signals, AAP can analyze authentication behavior across invocations and detect suspicious patterns, including brute force attacks, credential stuffing, and distributed credential stuffing campaigns. These detections rely on indicators such as login velocity anomalies, repeated failures, and activity across multiple IP addresses.

Security signal highlighting a credential stuffing attack with attacker metadata and affected users.

Because these signals are enriched with application context, your teams can quickly identify affected users and investigate attacker behavior. This context also enables automated responses, such as blocking malicious IP addresses or enforcing additional authentication steps.

Start monitoring threats in your Python Lambda functions

By bringing in-process security monitoring to Python Lambda functions, Datadog AAP gives you the visibility that you need to detect real threats, not just suspicious traffic. You can observe how requests interact with your code, identify successful exploits, and correlate authentication activity across distributed serverless workloads.

To get started, enable AAP on your instrumented Lambda functions by setting DD_APPSEC_ENABLED=true. For detailed setup instructions, read our documentation for securing Python Lambda functions.

If you’re new to Datadog, you can sign up for a 14-day free trial to start monitoring threats across your Python Lambda functions.