惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

A
About on SuperTechFans
Cloudbric
Cloudbric
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
C
Cisco Blogs
T
Tenable Blog
P
Privacy International News Feed
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
I
Intezer
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
IT之家
IT之家
博客园 - 司徒正美
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
博客园 - 【当耐特】
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
博客园 - Franky
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
V
Visual Studio Blog
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
H
Hacker News: Front Page
Latest news
Latest news
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
腾讯CDC
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
A
Arctic Wolf
S
Securelist
雷峰网
雷峰网
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
Project Zero
Project Zero
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Schneier on Security
Schneier on Security
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
The Last Watchdog
The Last Watchdog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
S
Schneier on Security
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
Jina AI
Jina AI
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence

Datadog | The Monitor blog

Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What’s new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis Monitor Aruba Central in Datadog How we centralize and remediate risks with Datadog Case Management Accelerate incident response with Datadog and ServiceNow Monitor your application and network load balancer logs Understanding Karpenter architecture for Kubernetes autoscaling Tools for collecting metrics and logs from Karpenter Monitor Karpenter with Datadog What your product data is actually saying Key metrics for monitoring Karpenter Securing Datadog’s platform in the AI age: The role of observability data Four ways engineering teams use the Datadog MCP Server to power AI agents Approaching your observability migration with the right mindset Meet the new Bits AI SRE: Deeper reasoning, twice as fast Key learnings from the 2026 State of DevSecOps study Use plain English to query your multi-cloud infrastructure in Resource Catalog Simplifying troubleshooting across the user journey with Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Protect your OCI resources with Datadog Cloud Security This Month in Datadog - February 2026 Amazon EC2 security: How misconfigured and public AMIs expand your cloud attack surface Enable end-to-end visibility into your Java apps with a single command Measure and improve mobile app startup performance with Datadog RUM Evaluating our AI Guard application to improve quality and control cost Identify untested code across every level of your codebase Make use of guardrail metrics and stop babysitting your releases Monitor Versa Networks SD-WAN performance in Datadog Improve performance and reliability with APM Recommendations Remediate transitive vulnerabilities faster with Datadog Software Composition Analysis Generate audit-ready vulnerability and compliance reports with Datadog Sheets Monitor Fortinet FortiManager performance in Datadog Improve test coverage across codebases with Datadog Code Coverage Move fast, don’t break things: Consistent testing standards at scale Enrich logs with ServiceNow CMDB context before routing to any SIEM or logging tool Monitor Lustre with Datadog Make faster, better product decisions with Datadog Product Analytics Surface and remediate runtime posture issues with Workload Protection Findings Protect agentic AI applications with Datadog AI Guard How to optimize JavaScript code with CSS Trace Google Pub/Sub workloads in Cloud Run with Datadog Detect human names in logs with ML in Sensitive Data Scanner How we cut our NLQ agent debugging time from hours to minutes with LLM Observability Debug PostgreSQL query latency faster with EXPLAIN ANALYZE in Datadog Database Monitoring Datadog acquires Propolis Unify and correlate frontend and backend data with retention filters Scale compliance across global frameworks with Datadog Cloud Security Monitor Arista VeloCloud SD-WAN performance with Datadog Building reliable dashboard agents with Datadog LLM Observability Simplify log collection and aggregation for MSSPs with Datadog Observability Pipelines Mitigation for Node.js denial-of-service vulnerability affecting Datadog APM Automate flaky test fixes with the Bits AI Dev Agent and Test Optimization How we built an AI SRE agent that investigates like a team of engineers Datadog integrations 2025 recap: Observability for AI, security, and hybrid cloud Design effective executive dashboards with Datadog Implement dbt data quality checks with dbt-expectations Bring faster visibility into AWS Lambda functions with remote instrumentation Troubleshoot faster with the GitLab Source Code integration in Datadog How Cambia Health Solutions saved $30,000 monthly with Cloud Cost Management and the Datadog Resource Catalog Normalize any logs for Cloud SIEM with Datadog's OCSF processor Optimizing Datadog at scale: Cost-efficient observability at Zendesk Detect, diagnose, and resolve network issues easily with CNM Network Health Connect engineering errors to user impact in early-stage products Cilium configuration for Kubernetes operations at scale Designing feedback loops for progressive delivery Ship features faster and safer with Datadog Feature Flags Choosing the right OpenTelemetry Collector distribution Route your monitor alerts with Datadog monitor notification rules Automate Cloud SIEM investigations with Bits AI Security Analyst Cloud threat detection: How to identify risky activity across control and data planes Collecting Kafka performance metrics Monitoring Kafka with Datadog Monitoring Kafka performance metrics
Integration roundup: Understanding email performance with Datadog
Aaron Kaplan, Alexa Liaskovski · 2024-09-25 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog

Visibility into email health and performance is indispensable to any organization seeking to reach its customers through their inboxes. As they work to curtail spam, internet service providers (ISPs) are redefining the standards of deliverability on an ongoing basis, and organizations often struggle to adapt. Meanwhile, oversaturation leads many users to pass over much of what does reach their inboxes, which can foil efforts to reach customers, and not only in the short term: Low open rates are among the many factors that can damage your sending reputation and compromise long-term deliverability. When deliverability is compromised, all kinds of important communications can fail to reach customers—from marketing and transactional emails to time-sensitive alerts.

Datadog provides a growing suite of integrations for monitoring email health and performance. These integrations offer visibility that can help your organization navigate the complexities of deliverability, measure engagement, and troubleshoot with precision when emails fall short of their targets.

In this post we’ll show you how you can use Datadog’s integrations for Mailgun, SendGrid, and Amazon Simple Email Service (SES) to quickly analyze your organization’s email health. We’ll also cover how you can gain additional visibility through these integrations by using Datadog Log Management to enrich your email performance data.

Quickly analyze your organization’s email health

Many organizations use third-party services to ensure deliverability and understand how their customers are engaging with their emails. Mailgun, SendGrid, and Amazon SES each offer a range of resources for managing email at scale, from deliverability and engagement analytics to mailing list management.

With Datadog’s integrations for these services, you can collect important metrics and logs and monitor email performance alongside your other observability data. Each of these integrations provides essential visibility into email deliverability and engagement.

Deliverability metrics

With deliverability metrics, you can track how often your emails successfully reach your customers and (in conjunction with logs) identify and troubleshoot issues that may tie back to your sending reputation. Each of these integrations allows you to analyze deliverability with metrics for sent, successfully delivered, and bounced emails. Mailgun and SendGrid provide metrics for both bounced and dropped emails: Bounces occur when delivery attempts are rejected by the receiving servers, while drops occur when your transport service forgoes attempting delivery owing to previous refusal of delivery by a receiving server (to prevent damage to your sending reputation).

The Overview section of our out-of-the-box SendGrid dashboard breaks down key deliverability metrics.
The Overview section of our out-of-the-box SendGrid dashboard.
The Overview section of our out-of-the-box SendGrid dashboard breaks down key deliverability metrics.

Engagement metrics

Where deliverability metrics indicate your baseline email health, engagement metrics help you understand how your emails perform once they’ve reached recipients’ inboxes. But it’s important to remember that ISPs track recipients’ engagement with your email, too, which can have a major impact on deliverability.

The engagement metrics provided by these integrations include the rate at which recipients open your successfully delivered emails and the links within them, as well as the rates at which they unsubscribe from your lists or mark your messages as spam.

The Engagement section of our out-of-the-box SendGrid dashboard.
Engagement metrics in our out-of-the-box SendGrid dashboard.
The Engagement section of our out-of-the-box SendGrid dashboard.

Alongside deliverability and engagement metrics, the logs collected from these integrations can provide even deeper and more granular visibility into your email health and performance. For example, the screenshot below shows the Log Analytics section of the out-of-the-box (OOTB) dashboard for our SendGrid integration.

Log Analytics in our out-of-the-box SendGrid dashboard.

With deliverability and engagement metrics provided alongside the SendGrid log stream and analytics in a single view, you can both jump-start your troubleshooting and quickly grasp trends in deliverability and engagement.

You can reference our documentation for a complete breakdown of the data collected by our SES, Mailgun, and SendGrid integrations. Next, we’ll explore how Datadog can help you build on this data with enriched visibility into your email performance.

Get enriched visibility into your organization’s email performance

Whether your organization uses SES, Mailgun, SendGrid, or all of the above, Datadog Log Management can help you build a seamless and richly detailed picture of your email performance. With Log Management, you can build on the telemetry you collect from these services by standardizing and enriching your log data and using it to generate custom metrics.

For example, since different ISPs impose different deliverability rules, you might want to track email performance by domain in order to guide your troubleshooting of delivery issues. You can do so with Log Management by creating a log pipeline and applying it to your email service logs. Next, you can add a custom grok rule to extract the domain from each recipient email address.

Creating a custom grok rule to extract the domain from each recipient email address in email transport logs.
Creating a custom grok rule to extract the domain from each recipient email address in email transport logs.

You can then define domain as a log facet, which you can use to tag or group metrics, enabling analysis of bounce rates by domain.

But let’s say you’re using multiple email services. Getting a cohesive picture of these bounce rates—or any email performance metric—could be complicated by discrepancies between the logs for these services. For example, SendGrid logs label bounce events Bounced and have a type of Blocked, whereas Mailgun labels them Failed, with a reason of Suppress-Bounce. Log Management makes it easy to resolve this type of disparity by remapping log attributes. In this case, you could map the Bounced and Blocked event types to the same value (e.g., @evt.name:bounced) in order to easily measure bounces across services.

Standardizing and enriching your email log data can help you generate metrics from these logs in order to augment those offered by your email services. For example, let’s say you want to track your email delivery times, which can vary widely based on sending reputation. (A less-than-perfect sending reputation may cause soft bounces—in other words, temporary refusal of delivery—of your organization’s emails.) In response to soft bounces, transport services may place emails back in their message queues and periodically retry delivery. These services will generally space out attempts to minimize potential damage to your sending reputation, which can be impacted by failed deliveries. Let’s say you’re using SendGrid, which will periodically retry delivery for up to 72 hours before dropping emails. You could track delivery latencies by extracting timestamp values from SendGrid logs with an @evt.name value of deferred and generating a distribution metric from these values.

Generating a metric from email tranport logs to track delivery latencies.

Or perhaps you’re using more than one of these services. By standardizing your tagging with log pipelines, you can easily generate high-level, cross-service metrics for email deliverability and engagement. For example, you might want to create an email_events.bounced metric to create a timeseries of all bounced emails, tagging by domain, for at-a-glance visibility into bounces.

Simplify and standardize email performance monitoring

With Datadog’s growing suite of email service integrations, you can build a comprehensive picture of your organization’s email health and performance, track engagement, and troubleshoot deliverability. To get started, check out the documentation for our SES, Mailgun, and SendGrid integrations. If you’re new to Datadog, you can sign up for a 14-day free trial.