惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
S
Securelist
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
O
OpenAI News
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
AI
AI
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Schneier on Security
Schneier on Security
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
Cloudbric
Cloudbric
Help Net Security
Help Net Security
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Security Latest
Security Latest
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
H
Hacker News: Front Page
C
Cisco Blogs
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog
K
KPMG report finds enterprise disconnect between AI and its ROI | CIO
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
The Last Watchdog
The Last Watchdog
PCI Perspectives
PCI Perspectives
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
Latest news
Latest news
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
I
Intezer
Project Zero
Project Zero
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
T
Tenable Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
H
Heimdal Security Blog
W
WeLiveSecurity

Datadog | The Monitor blog

Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What’s new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis Monitor Aruba Central in Datadog How we centralize and remediate risks with Datadog Case Management Accelerate incident response with Datadog and ServiceNow Monitor your application and network load balancer logs Understanding Karpenter architecture for Kubernetes autoscaling Tools for collecting metrics and logs from Karpenter Monitor Karpenter with Datadog What your product data is actually saying Key metrics for monitoring Karpenter Securing Datadog’s platform in the AI age: The role of observability data Four ways engineering teams use the Datadog MCP Server to power AI agents Approaching your observability migration with the right mindset Meet the new Bits AI SRE: Deeper reasoning, twice as fast Key learnings from the 2026 State of DevSecOps study Use plain English to query your multi-cloud infrastructure in Resource Catalog Simplifying troubleshooting across the user journey with Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Protect your OCI resources with Datadog Cloud Security This Month in Datadog - February 2026 Amazon EC2 security: How misconfigured and public AMIs expand your cloud attack surface Enable end-to-end visibility into your Java apps with a single command Measure and improve mobile app startup performance with Datadog RUM Evaluating our AI Guard application to improve quality and control cost Identify untested code across every level of your codebase Make use of guardrail metrics and stop babysitting your releases Monitor Versa Networks SD-WAN performance in Datadog Improve performance and reliability with APM Recommendations Remediate transitive vulnerabilities faster with Datadog Software Composition Analysis Generate audit-ready vulnerability and compliance reports with Datadog Sheets Monitor Fortinet FortiManager performance in Datadog Improve test coverage across codebases with Datadog Code Coverage Move fast, don’t break things: Consistent testing standards at scale Enrich logs with ServiceNow CMDB context before routing to any SIEM or logging tool Monitor Lustre with Datadog Make faster, better product decisions with Datadog Product Analytics Surface and remediate runtime posture issues with Workload Protection Findings Protect agentic AI applications with Datadog AI Guard How to optimize JavaScript code with CSS Trace Google Pub/Sub workloads in Cloud Run with Datadog Detect human names in logs with ML in Sensitive Data Scanner How we cut our NLQ agent debugging time from hours to minutes with LLM Observability Debug PostgreSQL query latency faster with EXPLAIN ANALYZE in Datadog Database Monitoring Datadog acquires Propolis Unify and correlate frontend and backend data with retention filters Scale compliance across global frameworks with Datadog Cloud Security Monitor Arista VeloCloud SD-WAN performance with Datadog Building reliable dashboard agents with Datadog LLM Observability Simplify log collection and aggregation for MSSPs with Datadog Observability Pipelines Mitigation for Node.js denial-of-service vulnerability affecting Datadog APM Automate flaky test fixes with the Bits AI Dev Agent and Test Optimization How we built an AI SRE agent that investigates like a team of engineers Datadog integrations 2025 recap: Observability for AI, security, and hybrid cloud Design effective executive dashboards with Datadog Implement dbt data quality checks with dbt-expectations Bring faster visibility into AWS Lambda functions with remote instrumentation Troubleshoot faster with the GitLab Source Code integration in Datadog How Cambia Health Solutions saved $30,000 monthly with Cloud Cost Management and the Datadog Resource Catalog Normalize any logs for Cloud SIEM with Datadog's OCSF processor Optimizing Datadog at scale: Cost-efficient observability at Zendesk Detect, diagnose, and resolve network issues easily with CNM Network Health Connect engineering errors to user impact in early-stage products Cilium configuration for Kubernetes operations at scale Designing feedback loops for progressive delivery Ship features faster and safer with Datadog Feature Flags Choosing the right OpenTelemetry Collector distribution Route your monitor alerts with Datadog monitor notification rules Automate Cloud SIEM investigations with Bits AI Security Analyst Cloud threat detection: How to identify risky activity across control and data planes Collecting Kafka performance metrics Monitoring Kafka with Datadog Monitoring Kafka performance metrics
Autonomously monitor for impactful degradations with Bits Detection
Samantha Scaglione, Maxime Agostini · 2026-06-09 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog

Monitoring is built around the system a team understands at a point in time. Engineers add endpoints, move dependencies, and change user flows every day. Over time, that creates coverage drift as monitors keep reflecting the system as it used to behave, while changing paths introduce failure modes that teams didn’t yet know to watch for.

Bits Detection automatically creates, tunes, and maintains monitors for your services. It draws on the telemetry, ownership, and deployment history Datadog already tracks, and on your source code when connected. From there, it identifies what needs coverage, sets detection rules for each endpoint, and adjusts them as systems change.

In this post, you’ll learn how Bits Detection helps you:

  • Identify which service paths need detection

  • Set detection logic from production behavior

  • Update coverage as services change

  • Connect detections to investigation and remediation

Identify which service paths need detection

Not every degradation has the same level of risk. A slow internal endpoint might be tolerable for several minutes, while a failing checkout, signup, or authentication path can affect customers almost immediately. Aggregate service health metrics do not make that distinction. A service may appear fine at the top level while one critical path is failing. 

Bits Detection uses the context already in Datadog to determine which parts of a service require detection coverage. It draws on service behavior, historical telemetry, dependency topology, team ownership metadata, recent deployments, and user impact signals to focus coverage on the endpoints and dependencies where a degradation is most likely to affect customers.

Endpoint-level monitoring can reveal degradations that service-level averages might hide. But maintaining that coverage manually doesn’t scale. A single service can expose dozens or hundreds of endpoints, each with different traffic patterns, customer impact, and failure modes. Those endpoints also change as engineers add routes, modify user flows, or shift traffic through small frontend or API changes. Low-traffic endpoints can make static thresholds harder to tune because normal behavior may be inconsistent. Bits Detection helps address this challenge by determining which endpoints need coverage, setting detection logic from observed behavior, and keeping coverage current.

Bits Detection list of six critical endpoints selected by traffic and user impact.

Set detection logic from production behavior

Knowing which endpoints to watch is only part of the problem. Unlike traditional monitoring, which relies on static thresholds, Bits Detection determines what unhealthy behavior looks like for each service and endpoint by evaluating changes against observed production behavior and actual customer impact.

Production metrics are not static. Normal baseline behavior changes as services evolve. Bits Detection accounts for that when evaluating whether a change is worth alerting on, rather than firing on metrics that move outside a static preset range.

You can shape that logic over time through feedback. When you tell Bits Detection which alerts are useful and which ones create noise, you tune detection for your environment. Providing this information keeps operational judgment within your team while reducing the manual work of tuning and maintaining every rule.

Bits Detection monitor showing a sustained error rate alert on the checkout-api GET /promo-eligibility endpoint.

Update coverage as services change

Without someone actively managing it, traditional monitoring coverage can drift away from production. That gap is rarely obvious until something breaks. AI-assisted development accelerates this challenge. As teams write and ship code faster, they introduce more change into production than manual monitoring processes were designed to keep up with.

Bits Detection treats monitoring as an ongoing process rather than a one-time setup. As services evolve, coverage and alerting logic update to match without having your team manually revisit every threshold, routing rule, and endpoint.

Your team’s existing monitors can stay in place. The coverage your team has built for known failure modes, service level objectives, and compliance requirements continues to work as configured. Bits Detection works alongside them, adding adaptive coverage for the parts of your system that change too quickly to model by hand.

Detection is where the response process starts. After an issue surfaces, you still need to find out what changed, understand the blast radius, identify the likely cause, decide what to do, and confirm the service recovered. For many organizations, each step requires pulling information from different tools.

When Bits Detection flags an issue, it points to the affected endpoint and the related telemetry, so you know where to start.

This is the first step in the Bits workflow that moves from detection to investigation to remediation. Bits Detection reduces mean time to detection (MTTD) by identifying issues earlier. Autonomous investigation begins triage, while autonomous remediation helps you move from likely cause to recovery by recommending or taking action within defined guardrails.

Getting started with Bits Detection

Bits Detection keeps monitoring aligned with production by automatically identifying which endpoints and dependencies need coverage, determining what healthy behavior looks like for each, and updating that coverage as services change. It enables you to spend less time writing and tuning monitors, and helps you catch issues on critical paths before they show up in aggregate service-level health.

To start using Bits Detection, sign up for the Preview today.

If you’re not already a Datadog customer, start a 14-day free Datadog trial.