惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
V
Visual Studio Blog
IT之家
IT之家
博客园 - 聂微东
The Cloudflare Blog
月光博客
月光博客
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
爱范儿
爱范儿
H
Help Net Security
博客园 - 叶小钗
V
V2EX
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
J
Java Code Geeks
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
博客园_首页
C
Check Point Blog
B
Blog
D
DataBreaches.Net
美团技术团队
罗磊的独立博客

Datadog | The Monitor blog

Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What’s new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis
Enhance application security in production with Datadog C...
Gorka Vicente · 2023-11-15 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog
Gorka Vicente

Gorka Vicente

The modern application landscape is rapidly evolving, creating new tools, technologies, and processes that allow organizations to deploy production code faster. But risks to application security have also changed significantly, requiring the security discipline to evolve in order to adapt to new types of attacks. While solutions like Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) have become a widely used approach to detecting vulnerabilities, many organizations are shifting to ones that provide deeper visibility into production code.

In this post, we’ll look at the challenges of using DASTs and how taking an instrumentation-based approach through Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST) solves them. Along the way, we’ll also look at how Datadog Code Security uses the IAST approach to efficiently detect security vulnerabilities in production environments.

Challenges with using DASTs for application security

Traditional solutions like DASTs work independently of the application being tested, simulating attacks against them by executing a series of HTTP requests and evaluating their responses. This approach requires that organizations launch a scan and then wait for the results, creating a point-in-time snapshot of an application’s security instead of continuous security monitoring. For applications with a large footprint, this type of security testing can take days to complete. Even minor code changes or vulnerability fixes would require another full scan, which can be a significant hurdle for organizations who deploy production code at a high velocity.

Because DASTs operate outside of an application, they lack granular visibility into the interactions between an application’s services, resources, and other components. This limited scope introduces challenges for building complete security coverage. First, while DASTs can detect vulnerabilities from external threats, they end up missing deep-level vulnerabilities that affect an application’s code or architecture. Second, without this internal visibility, DASTs also lack the necessary context for finding the source of a detected vulnerability and acting on it.

With the combined challenges of lack of visibility into the code and the “launch and wait” approach, relying on DASTs alone to assess application security can create significant gaps in an organization’s overall security strategy. To address these gaps, security teams need a solution that not only improves the scope of their vulnerability detection but also their remediation efforts.

Using an instrumentation-based approach to application security testing

IAST models use instrumentation to analyze applications in their running state, monitoring requests and their interactions with each internal layer—operating similarly to application performance monitoring (APM). This instrumentation-based approach plays a key role in helping organizations find and mitigate a broader range of vulnerabilities that traditional solutions like DASTs may miss.

Instrumentation enables IASTs to easily integrate with an organization’s existing infrastructure, continuously monitor all production traffic for vulnerabilities, and provide security insights in real-time. With these advantages, security teams can quickly ramp up security monitoring without disrupting production releases. For example, they can use the Datadog Agent and their application’s existing instrumentation to detect vulnerabilities instead of relying on manually executed attacks, scans, or costly penetration testing.

The instrumentation-based approach also enables IASTs to provide greater coverage for a wider range of vulnerabilities than other application security testing solutions. Datadog Code Security offers 100 percent coverage against the OWASP benchmark, which evaluates application security testing solutions like IASTs against common vulnerability types. This scope of coverage ensures that teams can detect vulnerabilities with complete accuracy, regardless of how complex, severe, or widespread those vulnerabilities are.

OWASP Benchmark Test Results

In addition to its ability to integrate with existing infrastructure and create exhaustive coverage, instrumentation plays a key role in offering all of the necessary context for confirming and fixing vulnerabilities. Datadog Code Security automatically provides the information teams need to understand exactly where a vulnerability is in an application—from the affected filename down to the exact method and line number. If they’ve enabled our GitHub integration, Datadog will also show them the first impacted version of a service, the commit that introduced the vulnerability, and a snippet of the vulnerable code. Together, this information gives teams insight into where and when a vulnerability occurred so they can efficiently prioritize their work.

Datadog Code Security

Comprehensive application security testing with Datadog Code Security

IASTs provide continuous, code-level vulnerability detection for your applications, which is a critical requirement for maintaining secure, reliable production environments. Since this approach works within the application, it enables teams to detect vulnerabilities that other security testing solutions may miss. Datadog Code Security takes advantage of the IAST approach to offer an up-to-date view of your application’s attack surface.

To start detecting code-level vulnerabilities in production, check out our documentation. If you don’t already have a Datadog account, you can sign up for a free 14-day trial.