惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Y
Y Combinator Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
量子位
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
博客园_首页
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
月光博客
月光博客
I
InfoQ
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Vercel News
Vercel News
美团技术团队
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
P
Proofpoint News Feed
D
Docker
F
Fortinet All Blogs
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
博客园 - 叶小钗
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
雷峰网
雷峰网
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
J
Java Code Geeks
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog

Forbes - Innovation

Why Do Humans Have Fingerprints? Hint: It’s Not What You Think Booking.com Confirms Data Breach, Reservation PIN Codes Changed Why Major News Sites Are Blocking The Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine iPhone Fold Release Date: New Report Details Frustrating Apple News Comet Tracker: How To See Pan-STARRS And Three Planets On Wednesday NYT Mini Crossword Today: Tuesday, April 14 Hints And Answers Today’s NYT Strands Hints, Spangram, Answers: Tuesday, April 14 (It’s A Little Unclear) Today’s Wordle #1760 Hints And Answer For Tuesday, April 14 Most Of The Microplastics In Urban Air Come From Tires Today’s Wordle #1759 Hints And Answer For Monday, April 13 NYT Mini Crossword Today: Monday, April 13 Hints And Answers NYT Pips Today: Hints, Answers And Walkthrough For Monday, April 13 The YC Chief Who Codes 10,000 Lines A Day Has A Simple Secret Samsung Expands One UI 8.5 Beta To More Galaxy Owners Why You Should Stop Using Your iPhone If It’s On This List Chamath Says Firms That Treat AI As A Strategy Hand Rivals Their Edge 3 Unexpected Habits Of Secure Couples, By A Psychologist The First Lamp That Folds Your Clothes Samsung’s Disappointing Price Update For Galaxy Phone Buyers 3 Subtle Signs Someone Is Falling In Love With You, By A Psychologist Do Mantis Shrimp See More Colors Than Humans? A Biologist Explains NYT Connections Answers Explained For Monday, April 13 (#1,037) NYT Connections Hints Today: Monday, April 13 Clues And Answers (#1,037) LEGO Luigi & Mach 8 (72050) Review: 2026’s Best Set Yet? Marc Andreessen Says AI Productivity Will Trigger A Hiring Boom 3D Printing Is The Ultimate Hack To Reduce Household Spending Apple iPhone Fold: Striking Design Revealed In Leaked Photos Apple Smart Glasses: New Leak Reveals A Major Design Twist To Beat Meta Tested: The AI Coming To The Rivian R2 Quordle Hints Today: Monday, April 13 Clues And Answers
How AI Could Blow Up Corporate Hierarchies
Bernard Marr · 2026-06-26 · via Forbes - Innovation
AI is set to reshape workplace hierarchies by giving individuals the power to do work that once required entire teams.

AI is set to reshape workplace hierarchies by giving individuals the power to do work that once required entire teams.

Adobe Stock

AI could soon change one of the oldest rules of business, the idea that power flows from seniority, experience and position.

For decades, the corporate pecking order has been relatively clear. Senior leaders set direction, managers coordinate work and specialist professionals build status through knowledge, qualifications and experience. AI is now starting to disrupt that structure.

A junior employee with strong AI skills can already produce work that once required researchers, analysts, designers, administrators and technical specialists. Doctors, lawyers, bankers, marketers, product managers and other knowledge workers are seeing parts of their expertise supported, accelerated or automated by machines.

The real disruption is that AI changes the source of workplace power. Influence will increasingly come from the ability to use AI well, redesign workflows and multiply output, rather than from seniority alone.

This does not mean hierarchy disappears. It means the old signals of authority, such as tenure, job title and specialist knowledge, will sit alongside new signals of influence, including AI literacy, adaptability and the ability to redesign how work gets done.

That raises a pressing question for business leaders. What happens when the people who understand AI best are not necessarily the people at the top?

How AI Changes Who Holds Power At Work

Hierarchies exist for a reason, and most organizations adhere to conventional structures involving senior leaders, middle managers and workers. Responsibility is apportioned accordingly, with leaders accountable for results, managers for implementing and overseeing workflows, and workers for getting the work done.

Today, however, a single worker, particularly in professional and knowledge-based fields, can use AI tools to carry out tasks that once required support from an entire cast of administrators, supervisors, researchers, designers and technical specialists.

This means they can rebuild entire workflows single-handedly.

A marketer can use AI to conduct market research, build a campaign, personalize it for individual customers, analyze its performance and then do it all again, learning from previous results.

A product manager can design, build and test prototypes using AI coding tools, quickly gaining an understanding of how a new concept will work, without a lengthy and expensive research and development process.

The people who can do this well and teach others will inevitably see their value within their organization increase. This could set the scene for a significant rebalance of power.

Within this new dynamic, individuals, teams and organizations that successfully adopt AI are likely to find themselves punching significantly above their weight when it comes to winning influence, promotion and leadership opportunities.

This raises difficult questions for managers. Many management tasks, from tracking progress to summarizing updates and allocating resources, can already be supported by AI. The managers who remain most valuable will be those who can coach people, make good judgment calls, resolve complexity and help teams use AI responsibly.

The challenge will be making sure opportunities and advantages are democratized and spread widely, rather than concentrated among small groups with privileged access to tools and AI-friendly workflows.

What Should Leaders Do To Prepare?

I believe this is about managing an inevitable shift in ways that avoid new divides, organizational bottlenecks, resentment or damage to company culture, while ensuring that the people who can use AI to drive real change receive the support they need.

This means shifting the focus from technology itself to opportunity. As many people as possible should have the chance to understand AI, experiment with it safely and apply it to the work they already do.

A good starting point is to treat AI literacy as a universal skill rather than a specialist technical capability. Whatever someone’s job is, they should understand the risks and opportunities of AI as it relates to their role and to the business as a whole.

Leaders must also think carefully about how performance is measured in a world where AI can dramatically amplify an individual or team’s contribution. Output, speed and productivity may become easier to increase, but judgment, accountability and responsible use of AI will become even more important.

That means giving broad access to tools and training, redesigning performance measures, watching for new divides between AI-enabled and AI-excluded workers and updating accountability as more decisions become automated.

Beyond the workplace, ensuring equality of access to AI opportunities will become an important challenge for society.

AI will undoubtedly help new voices emerge in politics, and we must balance this potential for change and growth against the risk of concentrating power in the hands of those with the greatest access to technology.

AI will change the corporate hierarchy by changing who can create value, who can influence decisions and who gets heard. The smartest organizations will prepare for that power shift now by building AI literacy widely, redesigning work thoughtfully and making sure opportunity grows across the organization rather than concentrating around a small group of AI insiders.