惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

V
Visual Studio Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
L
LangChain Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
J
Java Code Geeks
Y
Y Combinator Blog
月光博客
月光博客
雷峰网
雷峰网
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
F
Fortinet All Blogs
A
About on SuperTechFans
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
P
Proofpoint News Feed
小众软件
小众软件
H
Help Net Security
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
B
Blog RSS Feed
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
博客园 - 叶小钗
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog

Forbes - Innovation

Why Do Humans Have Fingerprints? Hint: It’s Not What You Think Booking.com Confirms Data Breach, Reservation PIN Codes Changed Why Major News Sites Are Blocking The Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine iPhone Fold Release Date: New Report Details Frustrating Apple News Comet Tracker: How To See Pan-STARRS And Three Planets On Wednesday NYT Mini Crossword Today: Tuesday, April 14 Hints And Answers Today’s NYT Strands Hints, Spangram, Answers: Tuesday, April 14 (It’s A Little Unclear) Today’s Wordle #1760 Hints And Answer For Tuesday, April 14 Most Of The Microplastics In Urban Air Come From Tires Today’s Wordle #1759 Hints And Answer For Monday, April 13 NYT Mini Crossword Today: Monday, April 13 Hints And Answers NYT Pips Today: Hints, Answers And Walkthrough For Monday, April 13 The YC Chief Who Codes 10,000 Lines A Day Has A Simple Secret Samsung Expands One UI 8.5 Beta To More Galaxy Owners Why You Should Stop Using Your iPhone If It’s On This List Chamath Says Firms That Treat AI As A Strategy Hand Rivals Their Edge 3 Unexpected Habits Of Secure Couples, By A Psychologist The First Lamp That Folds Your Clothes Samsung’s Disappointing Price Update For Galaxy Phone Buyers 3 Subtle Signs Someone Is Falling In Love With You, By A Psychologist Do Mantis Shrimp See More Colors Than Humans? A Biologist Explains NYT Connections Answers Explained For Monday, April 13 (#1,037) NYT Connections Hints Today: Monday, April 13 Clues And Answers (#1,037) LEGO Luigi & Mach 8 (72050) Review: 2026’s Best Set Yet? Marc Andreessen Says AI Productivity Will Trigger A Hiring Boom 3D Printing Is The Ultimate Hack To Reduce Household Spending Apple iPhone Fold: Striking Design Revealed In Leaked Photos Apple Smart Glasses: New Leak Reveals A Major Design Twist To Beat Meta Tested: The AI Coming To The Rivian R2 Quordle Hints Today: Monday, April 13 Clues And Answers
Why AI Has Broken Data Security
Ryan Windham · 2026-05-06 · via Forbes - Innovation

Ryan Windham, CEO, Forcepoint.

getty

​I like to fly drones in my spare time. It’s a hobby I’ve enjoyed for years, and one that has unexpectedly shaped how I think about leadership and risk, particularly in conversations with CEOs and CISOs.

When a drone gains altitude, everything changes. From higher up, patterns emerge. You can see shifts forming before they’re obvious, and when the wind changes, you don’t cling to the original flight plan. You adapt or you lose control of the flight. The same clarity and the same urgency apply when you’re responsible for protecting sensitive information at scale.

The biggest shift in security right now isn’t a new threat actor or a new compliance mandate. It’s something more fundamental: AI has changed the behavior of data itself.

Data used to be predictable. It was created by people and lived and moved in known systems. That world no longer exists.

AI generates data continuously. It rewrites, summarizes and recombines information in real time. It spreads data across SaaS platforms, cloud services and AI-driven workflows instantly. AI has effectively animated data, bringing it to life and making it self-perpetuating. Once that paradigm shifted, the old ways of securing data stopped working.

Three Data Security Assumptions AI Has Broken

Most traditional data security models rest on three core assumptions. AI breaks all of them.

Access Can Be Predefined And Left Alone

Pre-assigned access works when data stays in known locations and changes slowly. AI-driven workflows don’t behave that way. Data now moves dynamically between systems, users and applications—often outside environments security teams explicitly approved.

Data Can Be Classified Once Or Twice And Trusted Indefinitely

Static classification assumes data sensitivity is fixed. AI continuously generates new versions, summaries and derivatives, many more sensitive than the original source. Identifying and managing that risk can no longer be a one-time exercise. Data discovery and classification must be continuous, increasingly powered by technologies like data security posture management (DSPM), which gives teams ongoing visibility into sensitive data risk across cloud, SaaS and AI-driven environments.

Risk Can Be Managed With Static Allow/Block Rules

Traditional controls assume predictable behavior from users, devices and applications. AI introduces variability at machine speed. When data and risk change in real time, fixed rules will always lag behind reality.

When these assumptions break, the entire security model breaks with them. That's why so many CISOs say their stack can't keep up, not because they don't understand the problem, but because their tools were never designed for AI-driven, boundaryless data.

Data Visibility Alone Is Not Enough

In response, many organizations have doubled down on visibility. They're investing in tools that help them find data and understand where risk exists. That's the right instinct. But visibility without action quickly becomes noise, especially when data loss prevention (DLP) enforcement—tools that automatically block unauthorized data transfers across channels like email, cloud apps and endpoints—still depends on manual review or delayed response. When insight is disconnected from enforcement, security teams see risk but cannot respond fast enough to stop it.

This gap between spotting risk and acting on it, which I think of as the visibility-to-control gap, is often the difference between business continuity and a breach, a regulatory fine or reputational damage.

AI doesn't just increase data volume. It compresses the time between creation, exposure and impact. Whether generative or agentic, AI tools have shortened decision timelines. Data now moves faster than humans can review, approve or intervene. In an environment operating at machine speeds, monitoring risk is not the same as mitigating it. That’s why the security industry doesn’t just need better tools. It needs a different model. Increasingly, leaders are describing this as self-aware data security: an operating model in which security is context-aware, adaptive and continuous, connecting awareness of risk directly to enforcement, without waiting on human intervention.

There’s a moment in every industry where the future becomes obvious—but only to those looking from the right altitude. Right now, everyone feels the turbulence: the hype cycles, the complexity, the AI chaos, the pressure to move faster. But from higher up, it’s clear where this is going. Data is dynamic now. AI is creating and transforming more information than people ever could. Static rules and delayed responses can’t catch up.

In my next article, I’ll explore what the self-aware data security model looks like in practice—and how leading organizations are closing the gap between visibility and control.


Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?