

























Artemis II crew – (from left) Mission Specialist Christina Koch, Mission Specialist Jeremy Hansen, Pilot Victor Glover, and Commander Reid Wiseman (Photo by NASA via Getty Images)
NASA via Getty Images
Four astronauts just traveled around the moon and back, a welcome reminder of what is possible when human ambition meets tenacity. In a time when we could all use a little inspiration, Artemis II delivered.
Watching their journey, I can’t help but think about the staggering gap between the technology these astronauts were flying in and the technology powering our lives here on earth.
In 60 years, NASA went from mechanical slide rules to digital enabled autonomous spacecraft while the U.S. electrical grid still relies on mechanical infrastructure that predates the pocket calculator.
The grid powers every critical system in our society, from hospitals to water systems to financial networks, yet its technology is more akin to the Apollo spacecraft than the Artemis II mission that just came home.
The Apollo missions of the 1960s relied on mechanical dials and switches and a single flight computer with so little memory it could barely hold a modern spreadsheet. The crew and ground control manually fed in every guidance correction.
Kennedy Space Center: Apollo 17 Launch Control Room
Bettmann Archive
Orion, the spacecraft that just carried the Artemis II crew, had two simultaneously operating redundant digital control systems. Each computer is 20,000 times faster than Apollo's. More than 1,200 sensors fed data into software-driven controls that made real-time autonomous adjustments, freeing the crew from the constant manual monitoring Apollo demanded.
In comparison, the U.S. electrical grid remains, at its core, a mechanical, manual system. When it fails, customers still have to call a phone number to report it. Response times run in minutes, hours and sometimes days.
The grid simply never made the technology leap from a primarily mechanical system to the digital, software-centric system required to bring it into the 21st century.
Over the last 50 years, software-driven digital systems replaced mechanical ones across every major industry from computing to telephony to automobiles. In each case, mechanical hardware was replaced with software-defined systems that were smaller, faster and smarter than their predecessor.
The digital revolution that transformed computing and telephony was built on silicon transistor technology. But silicon breaks down under the high voltages and currents that flow through power infrastructure, which is why the grid was left behind while everything else went digital.
New semiconductor materials—silicon carbide (SiC) and gallium nitride (GaN)—can handle the extreme electrical demands of power systems. For the first time, the technology that transformed computers is available to power infrastructure.
Matthew Reynolds, Marketing Manager of Energy Management at Infineon Technologies, which manufactures silicon carbide and gallium nitride semiconductors for power applications, put it plainly: “With SiC and GaN, the grid can be controlled with the speed and precision we expect from modern electronics, delivering higher efficiency and the reliability utilities need as they integrate renewables, EVs and bidirectional power.”
The market is already moving. In 2025, Eaton, a $25 billion power infrastructure company, acquired Resilient Power Systems, an Austin-based startup that makes ultra-compact solid-state transformers using exactly this technology.
The grid's digital transformation is not a question of if, it is a question of how fast and that matters more now than ever.
Rising electricity demand from AI data centers and electric vehicles is straining a grid that was not designed for distributed generation, two-way power flows or intelligent loads that didn’t exist decades ago.
Today’s grid needs to dynamically orchestrate power sources in real time, balancing supply and demand across millions of endpoints simultaneously. It requires exactly the kind of fast digital response and software-driven intelligence that just guided a spacecraft to the moon and back.
We decided returning humans to deep space was worth it. Now we need to decide if the grid those astronauts just came home to deserves the same commitment. The technology exists. The investment case is compelling. The only thing left is the ambition and will to get it done.
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理,仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。