惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园_首页
H
Help Net Security
腾讯CDC
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
L
LangChain Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
J
Java Code Geeks
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
D
Docker
V
V2EX
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
G
Google Developers Blog
IT之家
IT之家
C
Check Point Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园 - 叶小钗
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
博客园 - 聂微东

Forbes - Innovation

Why Do Humans Have Fingerprints? Hint: It’s Not What You Think Booking.com Confirms Data Breach, Reservation PIN Codes Changed Why Major News Sites Are Blocking The Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine iPhone Fold Release Date: New Report Details Frustrating Apple News Comet Tracker: How To See Pan-STARRS And Three Planets On Wednesday NYT Mini Crossword Today: Tuesday, April 14 Hints And Answers Today’s NYT Strands Hints, Spangram, Answers: Tuesday, April 14 (It’s A Little Unclear) Today’s Wordle #1760 Hints And Answer For Tuesday, April 14 Most Of The Microplastics In Urban Air Come From Tires Today’s Wordle #1759 Hints And Answer For Monday, April 13 NYT Mini Crossword Today: Monday, April 13 Hints And Answers NYT Pips Today: Hints, Answers And Walkthrough For Monday, April 13 The YC Chief Who Codes 10,000 Lines A Day Has A Simple Secret Samsung Expands One UI 8.5 Beta To More Galaxy Owners Why You Should Stop Using Your iPhone If It’s On This List Chamath Says Firms That Treat AI As A Strategy Hand Rivals Their Edge 3 Unexpected Habits Of Secure Couples, By A Psychologist The First Lamp That Folds Your Clothes Samsung’s Disappointing Price Update For Galaxy Phone Buyers 3 Subtle Signs Someone Is Falling In Love With You, By A Psychologist Do Mantis Shrimp See More Colors Than Humans? A Biologist Explains NYT Connections Answers Explained For Monday, April 13 (#1,037) NYT Connections Hints Today: Monday, April 13 Clues And Answers (#1,037) LEGO Luigi & Mach 8 (72050) Review: 2026’s Best Set Yet? Marc Andreessen Says AI Productivity Will Trigger A Hiring Boom 3D Printing Is The Ultimate Hack To Reduce Household Spending Apple iPhone Fold: Striking Design Revealed In Leaked Photos Apple Smart Glasses: New Leak Reveals A Major Design Twist To Beat Meta Tested: The AI Coming To The Rivian R2 Quordle Hints Today: Monday, April 13 Clues And Answers
The New AI Career Divide Is Already Starting To Show
Bernard Marr · 2026-04-27 · via Forbes - Innovation
AI is starting to influence who gets hired, who earns more, and who creates the most value at work, even if widespread job replacement has not fully arrived.

AI is starting to influence who gets hired, who earns more, and who creates the most value at work, even if widespread job replacement has not fully arrived.

Adobe Stock

Three years on from the launch of ChatGPT, the real implications of AI in the workplace are becoming clearer. Rather than prediction and speculation, real-world change and transformation is starting to happen.

You’ve probably heard the now-familiar line that AI won’t replace people, but people who use AI will replace people who don’t.

But is it actually happening?

There have been mass layoffs, reskilling drives and government initiatives aimed at transforming entire regions into hotbeds of AI talent and innovation.

But has adopting AI into your working life really become the golden ticket to future-proofing your career or business? Let’s take a look.

Why Will People With AI Skills Be So Valuable?

Right now, the AI that’s most valuable to businesses is AI that can automate routine tasks, complete work more quickly and efficiently or create new opportunities and business models.

In theory, workers skilled with AI tools should be able to complete many tasks more quickly than those who aren’t.

The biggest winners, though, are those who can use AI not just to work more efficiently, but to rethink their job from the ground up.

Take software engineering, for example. This is a field where AI has already been highly disruptive, with claims that entry-level jobs are disappearing and senior developers are becoming more productive.

The low-hanging fruit, like using AI to generate boilerplate code and fix bugs, creates a straightforward path to efficiency and productivity gains, in theory at least.

But engineers who realize that AI effectively puts an entire virtual workforce at their command, enabling them to act more like project architects or orchestrators, fundamentally change what they’re able to accomplish.

Likewise, an HR professional can score quick wins using AI to screen CVs, draft job descriptions and handle routine employee queries. They will cut the time they spend on repetitive work and, hopefully, become more productive in other ways.

But if they can use it to implement end-to-end workforce management systems, make data-driven predictions about hiring needs, create personalized employee development paths and continuously optimize workforce performance, a new world of possibilities opens up.

Or consider a teacher. They can create more free time to spend face-to-face with students by automating marking and the creation of teaching materials. But by creating personalized learning journeys for individual students, or spotting opportunities to intervene earlier when lessons aren’t being fully absorbed, they can create entirely new education experiences.

So, the theory is sound. But the critical question is, how is this actually playing out in practice? Are workplaces becoming dominated by AI-augmented super-workers, or is AI just being used as an excuse to cut jobs?

And Has This Happened?

Well, as you might expect, the answer is nuanced.

There’s certainly evidence that AI skills are affecting hiring. In 2025, Data from PwC was already showing that workers with AI skills command a 56% wage premium over those doing the same job but without AI skills. This had increased from just 25% the previous year.

Other studies have shown that candidates who list AI skills on their resumes are between 8% and 15% more likely to be shortlisted for an interview.

And one survey found that 72.8% of people with a household income of over £200,000 ($269,000) have increased their use of AI in the past year, suggesting increasing use is correlated with higher earnings.

But while there have certainly been workforce cuts related to AI, not much data is available on whether a lack of AI skills was a factor in people losing their jobs.

Barron’s reports that AI was cited in 25% of layoffs so far in 2026, compared to just 5% during the same period in 2025. Some, however, have questioned how accurate this is, bearing in mind that CEOs right now are under pressure to do two things: reduce costs and justify spending on AI.

But accurate or not, job cuts attributed to AI still only account for around 5% of the total layoffs in the US.

So, while it’s hard to argue that AI is causing widespread job losses just yet, it’s clearly influencing who gets hired and where opportunities for humans are opening up or closing down.

So What Does This Mean For Me?

While there are signs that AI is affecting the employment landscape, it hasn’t manifested as the hugely transformational force that many are predicting. Yet.

It’s early days, though, and while the idea is more of a narrative than an operational reality right now, the direction of travel is clear.

AI skills are being used as a barometer of who is getting hired, who’s getting the highest pay and who is creating the most value for businesses. And as economic pressures force companies to continue to become leaner, more efficient and more innovative, the trend is likely to accelerate.

For those looking to understand how their job, profession or industry will be affected, I think the message is quite simple: Waiting for AI skills to become a requirement would be a mistake.

Anyone wanting to future-proof their career today should be looking at how AI will change their role, or the role they want, and working out how they can be a part of that change.