惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

J
Java Code Geeks
I
InfoQ
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Vercel News
Vercel News
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
罗磊的独立博客
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
B
Blog RSS Feed
H
Help Net Security
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
P
Proofpoint News Feed
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
V
Visual Studio Blog
B
Blog
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
L
LangChain Blog
D
Docker

MEDIANAMA

India in talks with US, Anthropic for Mythos access; no Indian firms in Project Glasswing yet Eternal Q4FY26: All Users Pay Higher Platform Fee, Only Some Get Discounts Amazon, Meta to challenge PhonePe-Google Pay dominance as UPI cap delayed since 2020 Meta failed to protect the safety of under-13s: European Commission If markets and regulators are ready for network slicing, we are ready: JIO Why defining ‘news’ won’t fix the free speech problems of draft IT Rules? #NAMA Eternal Q4FY26: Goyal Dismisses AI Disruption Risk as Zomato Quietly Builds Agentic Commerce Infrastructure Karnataka files appeal challenging the bike taxi ban lift in the Supreme Court How did WhatsApp turn 17 govt. flags into 9,400 digital arrest scam bans? Google Wallet integrates Aadhaar as digital ID, expands India’s mobile identity ecosystem Kerala HC issues notice on MediaOne’s Facebook page block in India MeitY warns VPN providers against enabling access to blocked betting platforms Shreya Singhal targeted private censorship. Today’s threat is the State #NAMA Amazon scales its quick delivery service ‘Amazon Now’ in 100 cities Can MeitY issue binding rules via advisories? Experts raise alarm over draft IT Rules #NAMA How 2019 election code of ethics became India’s three-hour content takedown mandate #NAMA Australia proposes new levy on big tech to fund news, opens draft law for consultation ‘judge, jury, executioner’: experts warn of Inter-Departmental Committee (IDC) overreach under New draft IT Rules Lowdown: TRAI flags low deployment under PM-WANI in public Wi-Fi consultation paper Why the NBFC licence matters for MobiKwik China blocks Meta-Manus deal, asserts origin-country jurisdiction: what this means for India ‘No transparency’: experts warn of expanding powers to block online speech in India #NAMA X launches standalone iOS messaging app XChat with encryption in India How India’s content takedown framework was built and where It has gone wrong #NAMA Claude Mythos puts India on alert: CERT-In, telcos, banks assess unprecedented cyber risks Explained: why did the RBI cancel Paytm’s banking licence? Meta now instantly blocks content in India Govt. asks ZEE5 to halt ‘Lawrence of Punjab’ web series release Online Gaming Rules notified, to be in effect from May 1, what are the major changes? RBI mandates additional factor authentication for e-mandates
Delhi High Court asks CCI not to pass final orders in App...
Prabhanu Kum · 2026-05-16 · via MEDIANAMA

The Delhi High Court on Friday asked the Competition Commission of India (CCI) not to pass any final orders in its probe into Apple’s alleged anti-competitive conduct linked to the App Store while the company’s constitutional challenge to certain provisions of competition law remains pending before the Court. A Bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia said passing a final order at this stage could create “complications”, particularly because Apple has challenged provisions that permit penalties based on global turnover, according to Bar and Bench.

What happened in court: The Bench told the CCI that it had issued notice in the matter only after finding “something considerable” and asked the regulator not to render Apple’s petition infructuous by passing a final order. “Proceed, but do not take final order,” the Court told Senior Advocate Balbir Singh, appearing for the CCI.

Although Singh initially opposed the plea, he later assured the Court that no final order would be passed. He also argued that Apple had sought multiple extensions during the proceedings.

Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Apple, argued that despite the constitutional challenge being listed in July, the CCI had fixed the final hearing for May 21. The Court subsequently directed Apple to cooperate in the proceedings.

Apple said its challenge to the constitutional validity of the regulations was not an attempt to delay or stall the proceedings before the CCI. The company also argued that the CCI had admitted that the penalty provisions were not merely clarificatory but expanded the scope of penalties under the Competition Act, raising concerns that Apple could face retrospective penalties based on global turnover. 

What was the CCI probing?: The CCI’s case against Apple dates back to 2021, when non-profit Together We Fight Society (TWFS) accused the company of abusing its dominance in the iOS app ecosystem. In 2022, Match Group, which owns Tinder, joined the proceedings and alleged that Apple imposed unfair restrictions and charged commissions of up to 30% on in-app purchases. 

Subsequently, Indian startups represented by the Alliance of Digital India Foundation (ADIF) also became part of the case. In July 2024, the CCI’s investigation reportedly found that Apple had engaged in abusive conduct and practices by forcing developers to use its proprietary payment system.

However, the dispute escalated after Apple challenged India’s 2023 competition law amendments before the Delhi High Court in November 2025, arguing that the provisions allowing penalties based on global turnover unlawfully expanded the CCI’s powers. 

Also read

Post navigation

While Jio said that FAST is OTT because it is delivered over the public internet, Sony underlined that FAST operates at the application layer and is structurally distinct from network infrastructure.