惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

G
Google Developers Blog
GbyAI
GbyAI
Y
Y Combinator Blog
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
B
Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
V
Visual Studio Blog
小众软件
小众软件
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
博客园 - 聂微东
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
博客园 - Franky
V
V2EX
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
月光博客
月光博客
IT之家
IT之家
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
C
Check Point Blog
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
博客园 - 【当耐特】

cs.DS updates on arXiv.org

PAC Learning with Bandit Feedback: Sharp Sample Complexity in the Realizable Setting Algorithms with Polynomially-Improved Approximation Factors for the $2 \rightarrow q$ Norm, and Applications A computational phase transition for learning-to-sample from Ising models Covering vertices by sequential stars Fermi-Dirac machines as quantizations of neurons A Comprehensive Evaluation of Vertex Elimination Algorithms for Algorithmic Differentiation A Tight Bound on Localization of Electrical Flows Optimal Dimension-Free Sampling for Regularized Classification Reducing the Randomness in Partition Oracles for Bounded Degree Minor-Free Graphs Beyond the Half-Approximation: Fair and Efficient Online Class Matching Efficient Uniform Sampling of Surjections via their Profiles Tractable Maximization of Budgeted Phylogenetic Diversity on Networks Utilizing Node Scanwidth Fairness in Aggregation: Optimal Top-$k$ and Improved Full Ranking Learning-Augmented Online Scheduling with Parsimonious Preemption Entropy Equivalence Testing Lumberjack: Better Differentially Private Random Forests through Heavy Hitter Detection in Trees The Secretary Problem with a Stochastic Precursor Polynomial-Time Robust Multiclass Linear Classification under Gaussian Marginals Efficient Banzhaf-Based Data Valuation for $k$-Nearest Neighbors Classification Block-Sphere Vector Quantization An Approximation Algorithm for Graph Label Selection Iterative Chow Filtering for Learning with Distribution Shift Complexity of Non-Log-Concave Sampling in Fisher Information Stochastic Matching via Local Sparsification Finite Sample Bounds for Learning with Score Matching What is Learnable in Valiant's Theory of the Learnable? Provable Quantization with Randomized Hadamard Transform Min-Max Optimization Requires Exponentially Many Queries Fast and Compact Graph Cuts for the Boykov-Kolmogorov Algorithm A proximal gradient algorithm for composite log-concave sampling
Parallel Shortest-Paths Using Radius Stepping
Guy E. Blelloch, Yan Gu, Yihan Sun, Kanat Tangwongsan · 2016-02-12 · via cs.DS updates on arXiv.org

The single-source shortest path problem (SSSP) with nonnegative edge weights is a notoriously difficult problem to solve efficiently in parallel---it is one of the graph problems said to suffer from the transitive-closure bottleneck. In practice, the $Δ$-stepping algorithm of Meyer and Sanders (J. Algorithms, 2003) often works efficiently but has no known theoretical bounds on general graphs. The algorithm takes a sequence of steps, each increasing the radius by a user-specified value $Δ$. Each step settles the vertices in its annulus but can take $Θ(n)$ substeps, each requiring $Θ(m)$ work ($n$ vertices and $m$ edges). In this paper, we describe Radius-Stepping, an algorithm with the best-known tradeoff between work and depth bounds for SSSP with nearly-linear ($\otilde(m)$) work. The algorithm is a $Δ$-stepping-like algorithm but uses a variable instead of fixed-size increase in radii, allowing us to prove a bound on the number of steps. In particular, by using what we define as a vertex $k$-radius, each step takes at most $k+2$ substeps. Furthermore, we define a $(k, ρ)$-graph property and show that if an undirected graph has this property, then the number of steps can be bounded by $O(\frac{n}ρ \log ρL)$, for a total of $O(\frac{kn}ρ \log ρL)$ substeps, each parallel. We describe how to preprocess a graph to have this property. Altogether, Radius-Stepping takes $O((m+n\log n)\log \frac{n}ρ)$ work and $O(\frac{n}ρ\log n \log (ρL))$ depth per source after preprocessing. The preprocessing step can be done in $O(m\log n + nρ^2)$ work and $O(ρ^2)$ depth or in $O(m\log n + nρ^2\log n)$ work and $O(ρ\log ρ)$ depth, and adds no more than $O(nρ)$ edges.