View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:A forcing set $S$ in a combinatorial problem is a set of elements such that there is a unique solution that contains all the elements in $S$. An anti-forcing set is the symmetric concept: a set $S$ of elements is called an anti-forcing set if there is a unique solution disjoint from $S$. There are extensive studies on the computational complexity of finding a minimum forcing set in various combinatorial problems, and the known results indicate that many problems are harder than their classical counterparts: the decision version of finding a minimum forcing set for perfect matchings is NP-complete [Adams et al., Discrete Mathematics, 2004], and that of finding a minimum forcing set for satisfying assignments for 3CNF formulas is $\Sigma_2^P$-complete [Hatami-Maserrat, Discrete Applied Mathematics, 2005]. In this paper, we investigate the complexity of finding minimum forcing and anti-forcing sets for the shortest $s$-$t$ path problem and the minimum-weight spanning tree problem. We show that, unlike the aforementioned results, these problems are tractable, with the exception of the decision version of finding a minimum anti-forcing set for shortest $s$-$t$ paths, which is NP-complete. To complement this intractability result, we design fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for finding a minimum anti-forcing set for shortest $s$-$t$ paths.

Submission history

From: Tatsuya Gima [view email]
[v1] Mon, 29 Sep 2025 05:45:50 UTC (92 KB)
[v2] Wed, 17 Dec 2025 09:19:43 UTC (78 KB)
[v3] Sun, 19 Jul 2026 23:00:12 UTC (58 KB)