

























Abstract:Popular offline reinforcement learning (RL) methods rely on explicit conservatism, penalizing out-of-dataset actions or restricting rollout horizons. We question the universality of this principle and revisit a complementary Bayesian perspective for test-time adaptation. By modeling a posterior over world models and training a history-dependent agent to maximize expected return, the Bayesian approach directly addresses epistemic uncertainty without explicit conservatism. We first illustrate in a bandit setting that Bayesianism excels on low-quality datasets where conservatism fails. Scaling to realistic tasks, we find that long-horizon rollouts are essential to control value overestimation once conservatism is removed. We introduce design choices that enable learning from long-horizon rollouts while mitigating compounding model errors, yielding our algorithm, NEUBAY, grounded in the neutral Bayesian principle. On D4RL and NeoRL benchmarks, NEUBAY is competitive with leading conservative algorithms, achieving new state-of-the-art on 7 datasets with rollout horizons of several hundred steps. Finally, we characterize datasets by quality and coverage to identify when NEUBAY is preferable to conservative methods.
| Comments: | ICML 2026. 50 pages, 15 figures. Code is available at this https URL |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2512.04341 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2512.04341v3 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.04341 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
From: Tianwei Ni [view email]
[v1]
Thu, 4 Dec 2025 00:07:08 UTC (5,056 KB)
[v2]
Mon, 5 Jan 2026 04:22:12 UTC (5,058 KB)
[v3]
Fri, 1 May 2026 06:11:28 UTC (5,050 KB)
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理,仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。