惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

H
Help Net Security
月光博客
月光博客
IT之家
IT之家
B
Blog RSS Feed
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
J
Java Code Geeks
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
博客园 - Franky
博客园 - 叶小钗
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
U
Unit 42
博客园_首页
B
Blog
V
V2EX
腾讯CDC
Vercel News
Vercel News
量子位
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog

cs.LG updates on arXiv.org

Memory-Guided Trust-Region Bayesian Optimization (MG-TuRBO) for High Dimensions EngageTriBoost: Predictive Modeling of User Engagement in Digital Mental Health Intervention Using Explainable Machine Learning Reservoir observer enhanced with residual calibration and attention mechanism Efficient RL Training for LLMs with Experience Replay Wireless Communication Enhanced Value Decomposition for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Adversarial Sensor Errors for Safe and Robust Wind Turbine Fleet Control IKKA: Inversion Classification via Critical Anomalies for Robust Visual Servoing Adaptive Simulation Experiment for LLM Policy Optimization EvoLen: Evolution-Guided Tokenization for DNA Language Model Smartwatch-Based Sitting Time Estimation in Real-World Office Settings Structural Evaluation Metrics for SVG Generation via Leave-One-Out Analysis Loom: A Scalable Analytical Neural Computer Architecture Spectral Geometry of LoRA Adapters Encodes Training Objective and Predicts Harmful Compliance Finite-Sample Analysis of Nonlinear Independent Component Analysis:Sample Complexity and Identifiability Bounds How does Chain of Thought decompose complex tasks? Uncertainty-Aware Transformers: Conformal Prediction for Language Models Adaptive Candidate Point Thompson Sampling for High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization Using Synthetic Data for Machine Learning-based Childhood Vaccination Prediction in Narok, Kenya Delve into the Applicability of Advanced Optimizers for Multi-Task Learning Bridging SFT and RL: Dynamic Policy Optimization for Robust Reasoning Multi-Agent Decision-Focused Learning via Value-Aware Sequential Communication Predictive Entropy Links Calibration and Paraphrase Sensitivity in Medical Vision-Language Models Efficient Hierarchical Implicit Flow Q-learning for Offline Goal-conditioned Reinforcement Learning Modality-Aware Zero-Shot Pruning and Sparse Attention for Efficient Multimodal Edge Inference The nextAI Solution to the NeurIPS 2023 LLM Efficiency Challenge Feature-Label Modal Alignment for Robust Partial Multi-Label Learning Integrated electro-optic attention nonlinearities for transformers Toward World Models for Epidemiology Tracing the Chain: Deep Learning for Stepping-Stone Intrusion Detection Batch Distillation Data for Developing Machine Learning Anomaly Detection Methods
What Time Is It? How Data Geometry Makes Time Conditionin...
Alec Helblin · 2026-05-12 · via cs.LG updates on arXiv.org

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Recent work has shown that models flow matching models can be trained without explicit time conditioning, challenging the standard view that the interpolation time is needed to disambiguate velocity targets. But why should a time-blind model work at all? Decomposing the time-blind flow matching loss, we identify two sources of irreducible error: a coupling variance, which arises from ambiguous velocity targets induced by how noise and data points are paired, and the time-blindness gap, which is the additional error caused by ignoring time. This gap shows that time-blind training is strictly harder than conventional training, reinforcing the puzzle that time-blind models work so well in practice. We resolve this tension by showing that the geometry of high-dimensional data makes time identifiable directly from noisy observations. When data concentrates near a $k$-dimensional subspace, time can be recovered from the statistical structure of noisy interpolants in directions orthogonal to the data; under a spiked-covariance model, this yields a closed-form estimator that recovers $t$ from a single observation $z$ at rate $O(1/\sqrt{d-k})$ for ambient dimension $d$. As a consequence, we prove that the time-blindness gap is asymptotically negligible relative to the coupling variance. We empirically demonstrate our identifiability result on real-world data and show that changing the coupling has a much larger effect on loss and sample quality than removing time conditioning across CIFAR-10, CelebA-HQ, and FFHQ. These results explain why time-blind flow matching works and show that the main practical lever is the choice of coupling, not explicit time conditioning.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.08344 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2605.08344v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.08344

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Alec Helbling [view email]
[v1] Fri, 8 May 2026 18:00:36 UTC (2,228 KB)