Exploration and goal-directed navigation in unknown layouts are central to inspection, logistics, and search-and-rescue. We ask whether large language models (LLMs) can function as \emph{text-only} controllers under partial observability -- without code execution, tools, or program synthesis. We introduce a reproducible benchmark with oracle localisation in fixed ASCII gridworlds: each step reveals only a local $5\times5$ window around the agent and the model must select one of \texttt{UP/RIGHT/DOWN/LEFT}. Nine contemporary LLMs ranging from open/proprietary, dense / Mixture of Experts and instruction- vs. reasoning-tuned are evaluated on two tasks across three layouts of increasing difficulty: \emph{Exploration} (maximising revealed cells) and \emph{Navigation} (reach the goal on the shortest path). The experimental results are evaluated on quantitative metrics including \emph{success rate}, \emph{efficiency} such as normalised coverage and \emph{path length} vs. oracle as well as qualitative analysis. Reasoning-tuned models reliably complete navigation across all layouts, yet remain less efficient than oracle paths. Few-shot demonstrations in the prompt chiefly help these Reasoning-tuned models by reducing invalid moves and shortening paths, while classic dense instruction models remain inconsistent. We observe characteristic action priors (UP/RIGHT) that can induce looping under partial observability. Overall, training regimen and test-time deliberation predict control ability better than raw parameter count. These findings suggest lightweight hybridisation with classical online planners as a practical route to deployable partial map systems.