惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
IT之家
IT之家
博客园_首页
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
美团技术团队
小众软件
小众软件
博客园 - 叶小钗
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
罗磊的独立博客
博客园 - Franky
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
博客园 - 【当耐特】
月光博客
月光博客
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理

Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog

EU Cyber Resilience Act Reporting Obligations Take Effect for Manufacturers Delaware Expands State Privacy Law Dutch DPA Fines Uber Over Automated Decisions Affecting Drivers European Commission Designates ChatGPT, Reddit, and Roblox Under the Digital Services Act China Issues New Rules on Cyberspace Security Inspection Court Approves Meta Settlement With 29 States Over Alleged Harms to Children and Teens FTC Proposes Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing New Jersey Enacts the Kids Code Act with Privacy-by-Default and Safety-by-Design Obligations White House Memorandum Establishes Framework for Government-Directed Private-Sector Cyber Operations FTC, California and Utah Sue Telehealth Company Hims & Hers for Deceptive and Unlawful Privacy Practices CalPrivacy Settles with Two Data Brokers over Registration Failures and Privacy Violations EDPB Adopts Guidelines on Anonymous Data, Web Scraping, and Blockchain China Publishes Official Q&A on Administrative Policies for Cross-Border Data Transfers Hawaii Enacts AI Companion Disclosure and Safety Law EDPB Calls for Review of EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework After U.S. Supreme Court Decision on FTC Independence CNIL Issues FAQs on Recommendation for Tracking Pixels in Emails European Commission Issues Guidance on the Cyber Resilience Act European Commission Issues EU AI Act Transparency Guidelines EU Digital Omnibus on AI Enters Into Force Connecticut AG Leads Multistate Settlement With 23andMe Over 2023 Data Breach CalPrivacy Targets Gig Economy Tech Platforms in First CCPA Compliance Audit New Jersey Adopts New Data Broker Registration Regime and Sensitive Data Sale and Licensing Restrictions CISA Plans to Finalize Cyber Incident Reporting Regulations in September 2026 Illinois Governor Signs Frontier AI Model Law New Hampshire Amends the NHDPA to Prohibit the Sale of Children’s Personal Data Canada’s Proposed Social Media Ban for Children and Chatbot Regulation: Bill C-34’s Impact on Platforms European Commission Unveils Cybersecurity and AI Action Plan European Commission Refers Four Member States to CJEU Over NIS2 Transposition Delays EDPB Opens Public Consultation on New Personal Data Breach Notification Template European Commission Advances New Proposal to Expand Cloud Capacity and AI Infrastructure
New York Attorney General Releases Final Rules for SAFE f...
2026-08-18 · via Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog

On July 28, 2026, the New York Attorney General (“AG”) released final rules (the “Rules”) implementing the Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation for Kids Act (“SAFE Act”). The Rules establish requirements for how social media companies must restrict addictive features on their platforms for users under the age of 18. The SAFE Act goes into effect on January 25, 2027, giving covered platforms approximately six months to develop and implement compliance programs.

As we previously reported, the SAFE Act was signed into law by New York Governor Kathy Hochul in June 2024 and prohibits covered social media platforms from providing algorithmically personalized feeds and nighttime notifications to users under 18 unless they obtain verifiable parental consent. The legislature charged the AG with promulgating rules to establish standards for age assurance and parental consent before the statute could take effect. The AG issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking on August 1, 2024, published proposed rules on September 15, 2025, and incorporated public input and industry research to develop the final rules.

Key provisions of the Rules are discussed below.

Applicability 

The Rules interpret the statute’s “significant portion” standard to mean an online platform where 20% or more of time spent by monthly active users is spent on “addictive feeds,” measured over any six-month period.

An “addictive feed” is defined as an online platform, or a portion thereof, in which multiple pieces of media from an online platform are: (1) shared or generated by users; and (2) concurrently or sequentially recommended, selected or prioritized for display to a user based, in whole or in part, on (i) information persistently associated with the user or the user’s device, or (ii) the user’s previous interactions with media generated or shared by other users, including the user’s interactions on different online platforms, media or the pages, groups, or other user-generated media the user requests, subscribes to, otherwise selects, or a combination thereof.

Certain activities are excluded from the definition, including recommendations in response to a search inquiry, the display of specific media in response to express and unambiguous user requests, recommendations based on user-selected privacy and accessibility settings and the display of media that is a direct and private communication. The Rules do not apply to platforms with fewer than five million monthly active users or fewer than 20,000 monthly active users who are covered minors, except platforms with a primary user base of minors.

Age Assurance 

Rather than mandating a specific technology, the Rules establish a framework for evaluating whether age assurance methods are sufficiently accurate, reliable and privacy-protective. The Rules identify three categories of age assurance: (1) age estimation; (2) age inference; and (3) age verification.

“Age estimation” is defined as using analysis of a physical or behavioral feature to draw a conclusion regarding an individual’s age or age status. “Age inference” is defined as using verified information other than age to draw a conclusion regarding an individual’s age or age status. “Age verification” is defined as using generally accepted identification, including government-provided identification, or validation against an official records source, to confirm an individual’s age or age status.

Parental Consent 

The Rules establish a multi-step consent process. First, the covered platform operator must provide the minor with notice that the operator cannot legally provide the minor an addictive feed without verifiable parental consent, and obtain valid consent from the minor to request verifiable parental consent for an addictive feed. Second, if the minor provides such consent, a covered platform operator must provide the parent with notice that the operator cannot legally provide the minor an addictive feed without verifiable parental consent and offer the parent access to a method of verifiable parental consent.

The Rules also specify as follows:

  • Covered platform operators are prohibited from disclosing to parents, in any notice provided to comply with the Rules, information revealing the minor’s activity on the platform, such as the minor’s search history or topics of interest.
  • Parents and minors must have the option to withdraw consent at any time.
  • If a parent refuses consent, the covered platform operator may renew a request for consent only at the request of the minor, and the mechanism for refusing consent must be at least as easy to use as the mechanism for granting consent.

Certification and Recordkeeping 

A covered platform operator must obtain a certification annually for each age assurance method it offers. The certification must include certain testing and must be documented in a written report, including testing protocols used and results. Covered platform operators must maintain copies of all test results, reports and certifications for no less than 10 years.

Enforcement 

Companies that fail to comply by the January 25, 2027, effective date face fines of up to $5,000 per violation, enforceable by the New York AG.