














Court Approves Meta Settlement With 29 States Over Alleged Harms to Children and Teens
On August 26, 2026, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers approved a settlement between Meta Platforms Inc. and 29 state attorneys general in a federal bellwether case concerning alleged harms to children and teens from Facebook and Instagram. The approval ended the advisory jury trial before its fifth day.
State Allegations
The states alleged that Meta used addictive product features to attract and retain young users, misrepresented or minimized associated risks, and violated state consumer protection laws and the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”). Meta denied the allegations and did not admit liability or wrongdoing.
Consent Decree
Under the consent decree, Meta is expected to pay approximately $12.2 billion over 10 years. The total may rise to $17.1 billion if certain conditions are met, including comparable safety obligations and monetary resolutions involving other social media platforms (“SMPs”). The settlement also includes approximately $459 million to resolve outstanding state claims tied to Cambridge Analytica and creates a $75 million fund for participating states’ investigation and litigation costs.
Additionally, the settlement requires Meta to implement a 10-year framework addressing youth safety in participating states. These implementation measures include:
An independent third-party auditor selected by Meta and a committee of participating states will evaluate Meta’s implementation of the corrective actions, issue reports and public executive summaries, and review corrective-action plans for material compliance gaps.
Remaining Litigation
The settlement does not resolve all related litigation. Florida did not join and has said it will proceed to trial. New Mexico also remains outside the child-harms settlement after separately obtaining a $375 million jury verdict and a $567 million abatement award against Meta. The agreement also does not resolve claims by individual plaintiffs or public-school districts.
The consent judgment states that it does not create a private right of action, constitute an admission, establish a standard of care, or serve as legal precedent in nonparticipating states or other countries.
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理,仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。