惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

雷峰网
雷峰网
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
V
V2EX
Jina AI
Jina AI
S
Schneier on Security
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
PCI Perspectives
PCI Perspectives
美团技术团队
小众软件
小众软件
L
LangChain Blog
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
T
Threatpost
T
Tor Project blog
K
Kaspersky official blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Latest
Security Latest
H
Heimdal Security Blog
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
J
Java Code Geeks
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
I
Intezer
博客园 - 聂微东
U
Unit 42
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
量子位
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
博客园_首页
月光博客
月光博客
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog
I
InfoQ
The Cloudflare Blog
Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Project Zero
Project Zero
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
IT之家
IT之家
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
C
Cisco Blogs

Todyl Blog

CyberChef: How to Decode & Decrypt Malicious Scripts (Step-by-Step Guide) MSP Security Maturity Assessment: Why 79% of MSPs Are Stuck in 2025 The Rising Threat of Malicious AI: What Every Organization Needs to Know Iran Cyber Threat 2026: What SMBs and MSPs Need to Know The OneStart AI Browser Deception Cyber Insurance Requirements Based on Industry Why Third-Party Security Certification Is Your MSP's Competitive Edge Why Cyber Insurance Carriers Are Shifting to Security Assurance Iran Conflict and Cyber Risk: What North American Organizations Need to Know ‍ Why Cyber Resilience Requires Security, Compliance, and Insurance MSP Security Services: How to Position Identity Protection as Competitive Advantage Identity Security Gap Assessment: A Step-by-Step Guide for MSPs How Credential Theft Attacks Are Costing MSP Clients Millions Do I Need Cyber Insurance as a Small Business? Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) Explained Preparing for CMMC Level 1: What Your Organization Needs to Do The Real Cost of Doing Nothing in Cybersecurity MSP Security: Build vs Buy SOC The Rise of a Cybercrime Alliance: What LockBit, Qilin, and DragonForce Mean for Business Risk Cyber Threat Recovery Strategies for MSPs What MSPs Need to Know about CIRCIA Final Rule ClickFix: The Evolution of Copy-Paste Social Engineering Akira Ransomware: Threat Assessment of a Scalable RaaS Operation The Dos and Don’ts of Applying for a Cyber Insurance Policy What Is Threat Hunting? A Practical Guide for MSPs and SMBs The Business Case for Cyber Threat Management Evaluating Free and Open Source SIEM Tools in 2026 How organizations can combat BEC Using SASE to help meet cyber insurance requirements Introducing the Anomaly Framework Stopping Identity Threats with ITDR through MXDR Security Operations Over Tools Beyond Tools: A Strategic Approach to Data Security Cyber Threat Response Strategies for MSPs Threat Advisory: Email Account Compromise BECs In the Wild: When Millions of People Are Expecting the Same Email Michigan and Wisconsin Proposed Age Verification Bills and the Impact on VPNs and SASE: What You Need to Know Cyber Threat Detection Strategies for MSPs Cyber Threat Prevention Strategies for MSPs Simplifying CMMC Level 1 with Todyl GRC How to Complete Your CMMC Level 1 Self-Assessment: A Step-by-Step Walkthrough Cyber Threats Don't Take Time Off How MSPs Build Lasting Client Relationships Through Proactive Operations Risk Management for MSPs: Why Business Context Changes Everything 5 Pillars for Security Program Growth in 2025 One Action MSPs can take to Address Risk and Secure Clients Building Resilience in a Perimeter-less World with Defense-in-Depth Aligning Technology Implementation to Business Outcomes Top 5 Myths about Cybersecurity How Conditional Access Transforms Your Cybersecurity Program Why MSPs need to embrace a prescriptive model How Texas SB 2610 Positions MSPs as Strategic Risk Advisors Simplifying cybersecurity maturity with managed cloud SIEM Addressing firewall vulnerabilities Understanding the Pitfalls of RDP MSP Zero-Day Response Plan: When Security Tools Can't Help You Old is Gold: Tackling Persistent Vulnerabilities How MXDR drives operational efficiencies Using SASE for secure remote access How to find the best endpoint security solution The Cyber Insurance Crisis: Why MSPs and Their Clients Are Struggling What to ask of a prospective endpoint security vendor Thinking Red, Acting Blue: Turning Attack Tactics in Your Favor Zero-Day Attacks and False Alarms: Lessons for MSPs Dissecting the Recent Rise in 2025 Zero Days MSP Security Monitoring Strategy: Identity and Cloud Blind Spots Introducing the Todyl Community: A Collaborative Platform for MSPs Threat Advisory: PDFast Freeware Compromise Navigating Today’s Cybersecurity Threat Landscape: Where MSPs Should Start Threat Advisory: Understanding the Recent SonicWall SSL VPN Vulnerability and How to Protect Your Clients Partner Spotlight: GoTech IT Solutions Threat Advisory: SQL Injection in FortiClient CVE-2023-48788 The Importance of SSL Inspection Navigating Compliance Frameworks: Common Challenges and Effective Solutions Making the most of SASE Web Filtering Iran & Middle-East Geopolitical Shifts: Emerging Cyber Risks for SMBs MSP Security KPIs That Matter: Beyond Vanity Metrics to Business Outcomes MSP Challenges Looking into 2025 Combining EDR and NGAV for Defense-in-Depth Starting Your Security Framework Journey: A Practical Implementation Guide Cyber Insurance vs. Warranties: Key Risk Management Elements Akira Ransomware: A Persistent Threat to MSP Operations Transforming Cyber Insurance for MSPs and Their Clients Two Truths, Double Whammy: Why Vulnerability Remediation Needs a Rethink Using LAN ZeroTrust for segmentation The role of SIEM in incident response Partner Spotlight: 917 Solutions Threat Advisory: Business Email Compromise Campaign using OVPN for Obfuscation Beyond Implementation: Creating an Ongoing Security Framework Program ClickFix: Fake Captcha Leads to Real Damage Streamlining Security and Compliance Information Gathering with Assessments EpiBrowser: A Sophisticated PUP Masquerading as Chromium Partner Spotlight: AnchorSix Tips to Help MSPs Set Goals for the New Year How SIEM helps detect insider threats Massive Wave of Network Security Vulnerabilities Demands Immediate Action FortiJump: The FortiManager Zero-Day Vulnerability Explained Use cases of SASE: Software-defined perimeter Threat Advisory: LightPerlGirl Malware Why MSPs Must Prioritize CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1 for Client Success
Achieving Zero Trust with SASE: A Practical Roadmap for Modern Network Securityso like
2026-05-01 · via Todyl Blog

The rise of remote work, cloud adoption, and increased reliance on SaaS applications have expanded the attack surface for organizations of all sizes. Traditional perimeter-based security models, where everything inside the firewall is implicitly trusted, are no longer enough to protect modern, distributed environments.

Zero Trust has emerged as the leading security strategy to address these challenges, and Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) as one of the most effective solutions for putting it into practice.

In this blog post, we will walk through a practical roadmap for achieving Zero Trust with SASE, covering the core principles, the role SASE plays in enabling them, and the specific steps organizations can take to move from concept to implementation.

Understanding Zero Trust

Zero Trust is not a single product or technology. It is a security strategy built on the principle of "never trust, always verify." Under a Zero Trust model, every user, device, application, and network connection is treated as untrusted by default. Access to resources is granted on a least privilege basis, meaning users and devices can only reach the specific systems and data required for their role. Verification is continuous, and trust is never assumed based on network location alone.

Forrester defines four core principles of Zero Trust:

  • Assume every network is hostile
  • Create an invisible network to operate in
  • Segment and isolate users and applications
  • Deemphasize the physical network and perimeter; implement security everywhere

These principles reflect the reality of the decentralized modern IT environment. Employees work from multiple locations, data is spread across cloud platforms, and the traditional network perimeter has effectively dissolved. Organizations need a security approach that accounts for this, and Zero Trust provides that framework.

The Role of SASE in Enabling Zero Trust

Implementing Zero Trust often proves difficult because it requires coordination across multiple security and networking functions. Many organizations attempt to do this by deploying a collection of point solutions: VPNs for remote access, standalone firewalls, separate CASB tools, individual DNS filtering services, and so on. This approach introduces complexity, creates visibility gaps, and makes it harder to enforce policies consistently.

SASE addresses this problem by converging networking and security into a single, cloud-delivered platform. Rather than managing multiple disconnected tools, organizations can rely on a unified SASE architecture that includes:

  • Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Identity-based access to applications and resources that replaces traditional VPNs with a deny-by-default model.
  • Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW): Advanced traffic inspection and threat prevention at the network edge and in the cloud.
  • Intrusion Prevention System (IPS): Real-time detection and blocking of known threats at the network layer.
    Deep Packet Inspection (DPI):
    Granular visibility into network traffic to identify applications, protocols, and potential threats.
  • DNS and Content Filtering: Protection against malicious domains, phishing sites, and unauthorized content.
  • Encrypted Traffic Inspection: Analysis of SSL/TLS encrypted traffic, which accounts for most internet traffic and is frequently leveraged by threat actors to evade detection.

By consolidating these capabilities into a single platform, SASE allows organizations to enforce Zero Trust principles consistently across all users, devices, locations, and connections. This removes the operational burden of managing disparate tools while improving the overall security posture.

A Step-by-Step Roadmap

With an understanding of how SASE supports Zero Trust, the next step is putting it into practice. The following framework outlines how organizations can approach implementation.

Step 1: Map the Environment

Organizations cannot protect what they do not know exists. The first step in any Zero Trust initiative is building a complete inventory of the environment. This includes identifying all users and their roles, cataloging endpoints, mobile devices, and IoT devices that connect to the network, documenting where sensitive data and business-critical applications reside, and mapping how traffic flows between users, devices, applications, and the internet.

Without this visibility, security policies are built on assumptions rather than facts. That is fundamentally at odds with what Zero Trust requires.

Step 2: Make Identity the Control Plane

In a Zero Trust architecture, identity replaces the network perimeter as the primary control point. Every access decision should be tied to a verified identity rather than a network location.

In practice, this means integrating with an Identity Provider such as Azure AD, Okta, or Google Workspace to establish a single source of truth for user identity. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) should be enforced across the board, particularly for access to sensitive resources. Role-based access control should be applied so that users only have access to the systems and data their role requires.

SASE platforms with built-in ZTNA simplify this process by tying access policies directly to identity. Users are authenticated and authorized before they can reach any resource, removing the implicit trust that legacy architectures grant to anyone on the internal network.

Step 3: Enforce Explicit Policies and Eliminate Implicit Trust

At the core of Zero Trust is the idea that no connection should be trusted by default. Every session and every request should be evaluated against a defined policy.

SASE enables organizations to enforce deny-by-default access, where nothing is reachable unless a policy explicitly allows it. Access decisions can incorporate contextual factors such as user identity, device posture, geographic location, time of day, and risk signals. Organizations can also implement micro-segmentation to isolate devices and prevent lateral movement across the network.

This represents a significant shift from traditional network architectures where devices on the LAN are permitted to communicate freely. Under Zero Trust, internal east-west traffic is subject to the same scrutiny as traffic coming from outside the network.

Step 4: Extend Security to All Locations

With employees working from offices, homes, airports, client sites, and everywhere in between, security can no longer be tied to a physical location. Organizations need to ensure that the same protections apply regardless of where a user connects from.

SASE addresses this by routing traffic through a secure cloud network. Connections are encrypted and inspected before reaching their destination, no matter where the user is located. This eliminates the need for VPNs, which are often slow, grant overly broad network access, and have become a frequent target for attackers. ZTNA provides a faster and more granular alternative, granting access to specific applications rather than placing users on the full network.

Because policies are enforced in the cloud, organizations can maintain consistent security controls across their entire user base without requiring backhauled traffic or site-specific hardware.

Step 5: Implement Continuous Monitoring

Zero Trust is not a one-time configuration. It requires ongoing monitoring to detect anomalies, verify compliance, and respond to evolving threats. This is where additional security capabilities become important.

A SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) solution aggregates and correlates data from across the environment, providing real-time visibility into security events and powering faster investigations todyl.com. Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) monitors endpoint behavior to detect and contain threats at the device level. Managed Extended Detection and Response (MXDR) extends these capabilities with around-the-clock expert monitoring and threat hunting.

When these tools operate on a unified platform alongside SASE, organizations benefit from a closed-loop security model. Threats are detected, policies are enforced, the blast radius is contained, and response actions are taken, all within a single environment rather than across a patchwork of disconnected solutions.

Step 6: Mature Over Time

No organization achieves full Zero Trust maturity overnight. It is a gradual process that should be approached incrementally, starting with the areas of highest risk and expanding as the organization matures.

Several practices support this progression:

  • Prioritize high-value assets: Focus initial efforts on the applications, data, and user groups that represent the greatest risk.
  • Use data to refine policy: Reports and analytics from SASE and SIEM can reveal gaps in coverage and inform policy adjustments.
  • Align with compliance frameworks: Regulatory standards like NIST, CMMC, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS increasingly map to Zero Trust principles, making them useful guides for implementation.
  • Demonstrate value to stakeholders: Zero Trust improves security posture, reduces operational complexity, and supports compliance objectives. Presenting these outcomes in business terms helps maintain organizational buy-in.

Common Pitfalls in Building Zero Trust

Organizations should be aware of several common mistakes when pursuing Zero Trust with SASE.

Treating Zero Trust as a product purchase is one of the most frequent missteps. No single tool or vendor delivers complete Zero Trust. It is a strategy that requires the right architecture, the right policies, and consistent operational discipline.

Overlooking user experience is another risk. Policies that are overly restrictive or that slow users down will lead to workarounds, which undermine the security posture the organization is trying to build.

Attempting to implement everything at once can stall a project before it gains momentum. Starting with a focused scope, proving value, and expanding from there is a more effective approach.

Finally, many organizations focus their Zero Trust efforts on remote and external access while neglecting internal network traffic. Lateral movement between devices on the LAN is one of the primary ways ransomware and other attacks spread. Segmenting and monitoring internal traffic is just as important as securing external connections.

Building a Zero Trust Strategy with a SASE Solution

Achieving Zero Trust is a significant undertaking, but it does not need to be overwhelming. SASE provides the architectural foundation organizations need to enforce Zero Trust principles across users, devices, networks, and applications without the complexity of managing a fragmented security stack.

The path forward starts with visibility into the environment, moves through identity-based access controls and explicit policy enforcement, and is sustained through continuous monitoring and iterative improvement. For MSPs managing multiple client environments and IT leaders securing growing organizations alike, SASE offers a practical and scalable path to making Zero Trust operational.

To learn more about how the Todyl Security Platform supports Zero Trust through SASE and its full suite of security modules, request a demo with one of our platform specialists.