惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

爱范儿
爱范儿
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
博客园 - 【当耐特】
The Cloudflare Blog
B
Blog
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
小众软件
小众软件
量子位
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
V
Visual Studio Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
美团技术团队
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
A
About on SuperTechFans
雷峰网
雷峰网
J
Java Code Geeks
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
腾讯CDC
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler

Scientific American

Former deputy surgeon general Erica Schwartz nominated as new CDC chief NASA Artemis II astronauts say thank you to the world Congress grills RFK, Jr., about vaccines and cuts to health budget How the Grand Canyon formed is a surprisingly messy story. Here's the latest clue How far from humanity were the astronauts of Artemis II? The answer will surprise you Effect of antiamyloid Alzheimer’s drugs ‘absent or trivial,’ Cochrane review finds The Trump administration is looking to experts to weigh in on peptides When a naked mole rat queen dies, that usually means war—but not for this colony NASA needs nuclear power for its moon base. Here’s the White House plan to get it Why do older people have fewer seasonal allergies? 250-million-year-old fossil proves mammal ancestors laid eggs A face-swapping illusion can unlock childhood memories 30 years of Pokémon—how the Japanese franchise mirrors real-world science Sperm whales may make their own vowel sounds, similar to human language Colombia will euthanize Pablo Escobar’s invasive ‘cocaine hippos’ NASA’s Artemis III will pit SpaceX against Blue Origin The East Coast could see blazing hot temperatures this week. Here’s why Scientists just discovered 5.6 million bees under a New York State cemetery The real science of Pokémon How chemists engineer the signature smells of luxury perfumes How two mathematicians solved a cryptography mystery The engineering marvels hidden inside six-figure watches Expensive versus affordable binoculars—what’s the difference? How physicists found a new type of magnet hiding in plain sight A hot pair of supplements, creatine and methylene blue dye, may not work together Unlikely paths to discovery The baffling ecological disaster that's killing America’s freshwater mussels Poem: ‘How I Became a Spitfire Pilot during My Cataract Operation’ DARPA built an AI to fact-check enemy weapons claims Mathematicians created an ‘impossible’ shape that shouldn’t exist
Jennifer Doudna
Tanya Lewis · 2026-06-16 · via Scientific American

June 16, 2026

The Nobel laureate on why the U.S. needs to treat scientific research as an essential part of the nation’s infrastructure

Jennifer Doudna with arms crossed in a white lab coat in a laboratory.

Nick Otto for the Washington Post via Getty Images

Jennifer Doudna is a biochemist at the University of California, Berkeley, whose research focuses on RNA and genome engineering. She shared the 2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Emmanuelle Charpentier for developing CRISPR-Cas9 as a method for genome editing.

[This interview was edited for length and clarity.]

How would you describe the current state of American science?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The discoveries have never been more promising, but the environment for advancing science in the U.S. has rarely felt more uncertain. In my own field, we designed a personalized gene editing therapy for a patient in just six months, so there’s excitement and momentum. At the same time, researchers across the country are having to spend more time worrying about whether their grants will survive than thinking about their next experiment. That’s corrosive, and it’s happening while the rest of the world is accelerating investment in exactly the fundamental research we pioneered.

What needs to change in American science?

We need to treat scientific research as fundamental infrastructure, not a budget line to cut. Every dollar the National Institutes of Health invests returns roughly two and a half dollars to the economy, and that’s been a consistent return on investment for decades. We also need new models for translational science, the work that turns a lab discovery into something a patient or farmer can actually use. At the Innovative Genomics Institute [IGI], we’ve used philanthropic capital to derisk science that’s too early for venture funding. In 10 years, with a mix of federal, state and philanthropic funding, IGI research has spun out 30 companies that have raised more than $5 billion and created 2,500 jobs. But most researchers don’t have access to philanthropic funding, and if science relies on philanthropy to derisk early research stages, we’re going to miss a lot of discoveries.

What gives you optimism right now?

A baby named K.J., born with an ultrarare disease with no treatment and a 50 percent infant mortality rate. A team of scientists designed a personalized CRISPR therapy from scratch, delivered it in six months, and the FDA reviewed it in one week. K.J. is home, thriving, taking his first steps. That happened because of a long chain of publicly funded, curiosity-driven research. We’re now working to scale that approach to reach hundreds of children with rare diseases. Beyond medicine, I’m excited about using CRISPR to engineer microbiomes, which could transform agriculture and climate. Also, the convergence of artificial intelligence and gene editing is accelerating key aspects of the work and helping us run fewer experiments but the right ones.

What’s your best advice for an early-career scientist?

Follow the question you can’t let go of, even if others don’t think it matters yet. CRISPR came from studying an obscure bacterial defense mechanism. Also, don’t underestimate who you might end up working with. My most important scientific partnership started with a walk through the streets of San Juan with Emmanuelle Charpentier. We came from completely different backgrounds, and that’s exactly why the collaboration worked. The best ideas often come from people who haven’t yet been told that something isn’t possible.

How has your field changed in the past few years?

CRISPR has evolved from a lab tool into a technology that underpins a new era of medicines treating real patients, with one medicine approved and dozens more in clinical trials. AI is transforming how we do the science itself, from designing guide RNAs to modeling DNA sequences with unprecedented accuracy. The field has also expanded well beyond human health into agriculture and climate change, with disease-resistant and drought-resistant crops in field trials and a $70-million initiative to engineer the microbiome. What started as a gene-editing tool is becoming a platform for taking on some of the toughest challenges that humanity faces.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.