惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

WordPress大学
WordPress大学
博客园 - 司徒正美
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
博客园 - 聂微东
Jina AI
Jina AI
月光博客
月光博客
爱范儿
爱范儿
美团技术团队
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
博客园 - 叶小钗
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
博客园 - 【当耐特】
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
罗磊的独立博客
小众软件
小众软件
雷峰网
雷峰网
IT之家
IT之家
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
V
Visual Studio Blog

Scientific American

Former deputy surgeon general Erica Schwartz nominated as new CDC chief NASA Artemis II astronauts say thank you to the world Congress grills RFK, Jr., about vaccines and cuts to health budget How the Grand Canyon formed is a surprisingly messy story. Here's the latest clue How far from humanity were the astronauts of Artemis II? The answer will surprise you Effect of antiamyloid Alzheimer’s drugs ‘absent or trivial,’ Cochrane review finds The Trump administration is looking to experts to weigh in on peptides When a naked mole rat queen dies, that usually means war—but not for this colony NASA needs nuclear power for its moon base. Here’s the White House plan to get it Why do older people have fewer seasonal allergies? 250-million-year-old fossil proves mammal ancestors laid eggs A face-swapping illusion can unlock childhood memories 30 years of Pokémon—how the Japanese franchise mirrors real-world science Sperm whales may make their own vowel sounds, similar to human language Colombia will euthanize Pablo Escobar’s invasive ‘cocaine hippos’ NASA’s Artemis III will pit SpaceX against Blue Origin The East Coast could see blazing hot temperatures this week. Here’s why Scientists just discovered 5.6 million bees under a New York State cemetery The real science of Pokémon How chemists engineer the signature smells of luxury perfumes How two mathematicians solved a cryptography mystery The engineering marvels hidden inside six-figure watches Expensive versus affordable binoculars—what’s the difference? How physicists found a new type of magnet hiding in plain sight A hot pair of supplements, creatine and methylene blue dye, may not work together Unlikely paths to discovery The baffling ecological disaster that's killing America’s freshwater mussels Poem: ‘How I Became a Spitfire Pilot during My Cataract Operation’ DARPA built an AI to fact-check enemy weapons claims Mathematicians created an ‘impossible’ shape that shouldn’t exist
Ivermectin prescriptions spiked after Mel Gibson touted i...
2026-05-13 · via Scientific American

There is no hard evidence that ivermectin can treat cancer, but that hasn’t stopped people from trying it

By Claire Cameron edited by Clara Moskowitz

Ivermectin tablets arranged in front of a package and bottle

Dimas Ardian/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Ivermectin prescriptions skyrocketed in the six months after actor Mel Gibson claimed a version of the drug successfully treated three of his friends’ cancer on influencer Joe Rogan’s podcast, a new study found.

On a January 2025 episode of The Joe Rogan Experience, Gibson said that the antiparasitic drugs ivermectin and fenbendazole, which are both commonly used to treat worms in animals, had made his friends’ cancer disappear. Ivermectin, the development of which won two researchers part of the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, is well proven for its safety and effectiveness in treating diseases caused by parasitic worms in people. But there is no clinical trial evidence to suggest that either drug can treat cancer in humans, and fenbendazole isn’t approved for human use.

Animal studies suggest ivermectin and benzimidazole, a class of drugs that includes fenbendazole, may have certain properties that could inhibit tumor growth, but this use is unproven. In February the National Cancer Institute said it was investigating ivermectin’s ability to treat cancer, but the research is preclinical, meaning that whatever findings come of it still cannot be applied to patients without further studies.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Nevertheless, after Gibson’s endorsement, prescription rates for ivermectin and benzimidazole doubled from January 2025 to July 2025 compared with the same period in 2024, the study found. Prescriptions specifically for patients with cancer also rose precipitously—rates were 2.5 times higher last July than they were in January 2025, compared with the same period in 2024. Male patients and white patients, as well as patients living in the U.S. South, were also more likely to be prescribed the drug, according to the research.

Importantly, the study can’t definitively say that Gibson and Rogan’s conversation caused the spike in ivermectin prescriptions, and it’s unclear whether the patients who received ivermectin chose to use it over other established cancer therapies, such as chemotherapy and radiation.

Still, the results underscore a growing chorus of concern from clinicians and researchers over ivermectin’s off-label use. Prescriptions of the drug also surged during the early days of the COVID pandemic, when it was touted as a potential treatment for the disease based on preliminary positive findings that turned out to be false. Now some experts fear the same could happen with cancer.

“Our findings extend prior work on the potential influence of celebrity endorsement on health care utilization,” the study authors write. “Such influence gains traction when institutional trust erodes. Protecting vulnerable populations from misinformation-driven deviations from evidence-based care requires coordinated action by clinicians, health systems, researchers, and policymakers.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.