The noted robotics expert discusses the need for better communication to the public on the value of basic science
Max-o-matic
Join Our Community of Science Lovers!
Ayanna Howard is an American roboticist, entrepreneur and educator specializing in artificial intelligence and human‑centered technologies. A former NASA researcher and currently dean of engineering at the Ohio State University, she will become president of Spelman College in August 2026.
[This interview was edited for length and clarity.]
How would you describe the current state of American science?
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
American science is still on an upward trajectory, but it is not accelerating at the same rate as it used to.
What needs to change in American science?
Scientists need to be better at saying what the impact of their research will be, even if they know it’s 20, 30, 50 years out. I feel that we aren’t doing enough of the basic science now and the basic science for the next generation. So we need not only to be better at communicating what we have done that has had an impact that took 50 years to come around but also to do more of it.
What gives you optimism right now?
I do see a lot more applied science being rewarded in the academic community. It used to be that if you did anything applied, you had to work for corporate or industry, and now applied science in the universities is seen as a valid form of scholarship. So that makes me happy and optimistic that we will continue moving forward.
What’s your best advice for an early-career scientist?
My best advice is twofold: Figure out what you’re passionate about, the problems that might allow you to change the world. But you also need to figure out which things that you are interested in you can get funded for.
How has your field changed in the past few years?
My field has changed drastically. I am a roboticist, and when I started, it was considered a niche—people thought, “Robotics, it’s never gonna happen.” And now that has evolved into companies actually putting billions into investments in the field.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.