惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Vercel News
Vercel News
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
D
DataBreaches.Net
K
Kaspersky official blog
T
Threatpost
F
Full Disclosure
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
S
Securelist
I
Intezer
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
罗磊的独立博客
爱范儿
爱范儿
S
Schneier on Security
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
L
LangChain Blog
美团技术团队
G
Google Developers Blog
T
Tor Project blog
Project Zero
Project Zero
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
W
WeLiveSecurity
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
PCI Perspectives
PCI Perspectives
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
V
V2EX
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog
T
Troy Hunt's Blog

Linear Blog

Introducing Loops - Linear Teaching an agent to auto-fix bugs - Linear Now Linear writes the code, too - Linear Reviewing code in the agent era - Linear Code review should be fast - Linear Code Intelligence for Linear Agent - Linear Output isn’t design - Linear How we use Linear Agent at Linear Post mortem on Linear security incident on March 24th, 2026 A calmer interface for a product in motion Design is more than code - Linear How our Customer Experience team works in Linear - Linear Continuous planning in Linear - Linear Designing remote work at Linear - Linear Self-driving SaaS: When software runs itself - Linear A Linear spin on Liquid Glass - Linear Best practices for designing Linear Dashboards - Linear Why we committed to a zero-bugs policy - Linear How Commure uses Dashboards to track performance and guide planning - Linear How we built Triage Intelligence - Linear Giving our team liquidity through Linear’s first tender offer - Linear How Cursor integrated with Linear for Agents - Linear Quality Wednesdays: How we trained our team to see what doesn’t work - Linear Our approach to building the Agent Interaction SDK - Linear Inside Mercury’s six-month journey building with AI agents - Linear Building our way: Announcing our Series C - Linear Why is quality so rare? - Linear Design for the AI age Building what customers need, not just what they ask for - Linear The profitable startup - Linear Why and how Scale migrated to Linear - Linear Simplifying support at scale: How Pleo uses Linear Asks - Linear How we built multi-region support for Linear How we redesigned the Linear UI (part Ⅱ) - Linear A design reset (part I) Rethinking the startup MVP: Building a competitive product | Linear Descript's internal guide for using Linear Post mortem on Linear incident from Jan 24th, 2024 | Linear Why and how we do work trials at Linear Using AI to detect similar issues Planning for unplanned work How we run projects at Linear - Linear Linear raises $35M Series B led by Accel - Linear How we think about customer experience at Linear - Linear Scaling the Linear Sync Engine - Linear Welcoming Cristina Cordova to Linear How we built Project Updates Settings are not a design failure Linear – 2021 Wrapped Fast growing startups are built on Linear Building at the early stage Linear raises $13M in Series A funding from Sequoia Capital Invisible details - Building contextual menus - Linear Practices for Building — Linear is now open for all Startups, Write Changelogs Linear’s Next Chapter: Announcing our $4.2M Seed Round
How we hire at Linear - Linear
Doug Parker · 2026-04-28 · via Linear Blog

Linear is small and profitable, and we intend to keep it that way. Every person who joins shapes how the product gets built, how decisions get made, and what the day-to-day feels like. We hire slowly, and we’re selective.

We’d rather explain how our process works than leave you guessing. This post covers what we look for, what the stages are, and what you can expect from us along the way.

Our perspective on hiring

Hiring well matters more than hiring fast. We’re happy to take our time, and believe each person who joins the team should raise the bar for the next one.

We value slope over credentials. Someone growing fast and thinking clearly will often outperform someone with more years and logos on their resume.

The best talker in the room isn’t always the best doer. Interviews favor people who present well under pressure, not necessarily people who are capable of great work. It’s one reason work trials are part of the process here. They give both sides better signal than another round of curated conversations.

We’re a remote team, distributed across time zones with relatively little process overhead. That’s by design, because we think the best builders want clear ownership and a lot of room to do the most meaningful work of their careers.

What we look for

The specifics vary by role, but the strongest candidates at Linear tend to share a few attributes:

Craft. You care about doing work well and have built real depth in your domain. You notice details that matter. You know the difference between extra effort and meaningful quality. This shows up differently depending on the role, but you can usually tell when someone has it.

Judgment. You can reason through tradeoffs, work with incomplete information, and make sound decisions without waiting for a script. At Linear we don’t use OKRs or run A/B tests. Decisions get made with taste, customer insight, and direct judgment. In interviews, we’re listening for how you think through a real problem rather than how polished the answer sounds.

Ownership. You take responsibility for a problem from beginning to end. At Linear, teams are small. You shape direction, make decisions, talk to users when needed, and communicate progress. It’s a full-stack way of working, and it requires someone who doesn’t need a lot of process to stay oriented.

Clarity. You can explain your thinking simply and directly. You respect other people’s time. You don’t hide weak ideas behind complexity.

Fit with how we work. You’re drawn to small teams, clear ownership, high standards, and focus. Linear tends to be a good place for people who want to build something rather than manage something.

What the process looks like

The exact sequence varies by role, but most processes follow the same general shape.

Application review. Applications go through our Careers page. Our Talent team reviews every one. We also proactively source candidates and welcome referrals. If you were referred by someone or were reached out to directly by our team, the process from there is the same.

Early conversations. If there’s a potential fit, we set up an initial conversation with a recruiter, hiring manager, or both. This is where we start to understand your background, what you’re looking for, and whether the role makes sense on both sides. We discuss compensation on the first recruiter call so neither side is surprised later. We’re also happy to answer questions about how Linear works day to day.

Team interviews. Next come a small number of focused conversations with people you’d work with. The content depends on the role. An engineer might talk through coding, architecture, and design decisions. A designer might walk through past product work and the tradeoffs behind it. A go-to-market candidate might discuss positioning, judgment calls, or how they’d approach a real scenario with customers. We’re trying to understand how you think and approach problems.

Work trial. For all roles, the final stage is a paid work trial. A 2-5 day project designed to approximate the kind of work you’d actually do here. You work with a small project team, get access to our internal tools, and deliver something real. They let us see how you approach the work, and they give you a concrete sense of how Linear operates. If you reach this stage, we’ll share a detailed guide and make sure expectations are clear.

Decision and offer. After the work trial, each member of the project team submits feedback independently before debriefing together. We start with a blind vote, then discuss. The hiring manager makes the final call, though we strongly prefer unanimous decisions. If we make an offer, we’ll walk through compensation, equity, and logistics directly and give you time to decide.

What you can expect from us

We keep the process tight. Most roles have three to four interview conversations before the work trial stage. We don’t add rounds for the sake of consensus. Most processes run four to six weeks from first conversation to offer, though this varies by role and scheduling.

All work trials are paid. We communicate the daily rate in advance and are flexible on scheduling. We know candidates are balancing other work and personal commitments.

Candidates who invest real time in our process deserve honesty in return. That means feedback if we don’t move forward after interviews, even if the conversation is hard. At the offer stage, we’re direct about business performance and what your equity could realistically be worth. A lot of companies are vague or overly optimistic about that. We’d rather you have an accurate picture.

We communicate directly throughout. If there’s a delay or a change, we’ll let you know rather than go quiet.

A note on fit

Linear isn’t trying to be the right place for everyone. People who thrive here want a lot of surface area and not a lot of overhead. In practice, that means fewer meetings, less check-in points, and more autonomy than most companies offer. That sounds liberating, and it often is, but it also means there’s fewer feedback loops people traditionally rely on.

If you want to know whether your work is landing, you have to develop your own read on it and go seek out the people whose opinion matters. Some people find that energizing, while others find it disorienting. Both reactions are reasonable, but only one of them describes someone who’s going to do their best work here.