惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

C
Check Point Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
L
LangChain Blog
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
A
About on SuperTechFans
J
Java Code Geeks
量子位
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
博客园 - Franky
博客园_首页
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
IT之家
IT之家
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
雷峰网
雷峰网
D
DataBreaches.Net
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻

cs.AI updates on arXiv.org

Policy Split: Incentivizing Dual-Mode Exploration in LLM Reinforcement with Dual-Mode Entropy Regularization METER: Evaluating Multi-Level Contextual Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models Think Before you Write: QA-Guided Reasoning for Character Descriptions in Books METRO: Towards Strategy Induction from Expert Dialogue Transcripts for Non-collaborative Dialogues Retrieval as Generation: A Unified Framework with Self-Triggered Information Planning Do LLMs Know Tool Irrelevance? Demystifying Structural Alignment Bias in Tool Invocations Enhancing Multimodal Large Language Models for Ancient Chinese Character Evolution Analysis via Glyph-Driven Fine-Tuning Exploring Knowledge Conflicts for Faithful LLM Reasoning: Benchmark and Method CocoaBench: Evaluating Unified Digital Agents in the Wild MathAgent: Adversarial Evolution of Constraint Graphs for Mathematical Reasoning Data Synthesis Efficient Training for Cross-lingual Speech Language Models Shared Emotion Geometry Across Small Language Models: A Cross-Architecture Study of Representation, Behavior, and Methodological Confounds A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of Persona Steering on LLM Capabilities Uncertainty-Aware Web-Conditioned Scientific Fact-Checking When Valid Signals Fail: Regime Boundaries Between LLM Features and RL Trading Policies When Verification Fails: How Compositionally Infeasible Claims Escape Rejection Mem$^2$Evolve: Towards Self-Evolving Agents via Co-Evolutionary Capability Expansion and Experience Distillation AOP-Smart: A RAG-Enhanced Large Language Model Framework for Adverse Outcome Pathway Analysis Advancing Polish Language Modeling through Tokenizer Optimization in the Bielik v3 7B and 11B Series TInR: Exploring Tool-Internalized Reasoning in Large Language Models Do BERT Embeddings Encode Narrative Dimensions? A Token-Level Probing Analysis of Time, Space, Causality, and Character in Fiction Generating Multiple-Choice Knowledge Questions with Interpretable Difficulty Estimation using Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models Deep-Reporter: Deep Research for Grounded Multimodal Long-Form Generation Too Nice to Tell the Truth: Quantifying Agreeableness-Driven Sycophancy in Role-Playing Language Models Learning and Enforcing Context-Sensitive Control for LLMs Efficient Process Reward Modeling via Contrastive Mutual Information Computational Lesions in Multilingual Language Models Separate Shared and Language-specific Brain Alignment Bridging Linguistic Gaps: Cross-Lingual Mapping in Pre-Training and Dataset for Enhanced Multilingual LLM Performance Early Decisions Matter: Proximity Bias and Initial Trajectory Shaping in Non-Autoregressive Diffusion Language Models LLMs Should Incorporate Explicit Mechanisms for Human Empathy
Using AI in engineering education: a balancing act, drive...
[Submitted on 15 Jun 2026] · 2026-06-16 · via cs.AI updates on arXiv.org

Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction

arXiv:2606.16626 (cs)

[Submitted on 15 Jun 2026]

View PDF

Abstract:Based on a questionnaire of 100 higher-education students, predominantly from engineering-related fields, and a critical review of recent literature, this chapter examines how students use and perceive Large Language Models (LLMs) in engineering education. Students primarily value LLMs for writing support, conceptual clarification, coding assistance, and brainstorming, while simultaneously expressing concerns about inaccuracies, bias, overreliance, academic integrity, and the burden of verification. Through an analysis of two dominant metaphors, namely LLMs as an "oracle" and as a "tutor," the chapter shows how these systems cultivate expectations of authority, expertise, and personalized learning that often exceed their actual capabilities. The chapter further argues that students' attachment to the promises of efficiency and personalized support reflects a form of "cruel optimism," where the perceived benefits of LLMs often depend on the very skills, vigilance, and expertise that students are still developing. Overall, the chapter argues for a purpose-driven and context-sensitive approach to AI integration in engineering education, emphasizing critical AI literacy, reflective assessment design, pedagogical caution, and consideration of broader ethical and environmental impacts.
Comments: To appear in The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Engineering, 2nd ed. Edited By Diane P. Michelfelder, Neelke Doorn
Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
ACM classes: K.3.1
Cite as: arXiv:2606.16626 [cs.HC]
  (or arXiv:2606.16626v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.16626

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Olya Kudina [view email]
[v1] Mon, 15 Jun 2026 12:21:42 UTC (418 KB)

Current browse context:

cs.HC

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

Demos

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.