惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

D
DataBreaches.Net
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
博客园 - 聂微东
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
V
Visual Studio Blog
IT之家
IT之家
博客园 - 【当耐特】
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
B
Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
Vercel News
Vercel News
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
H
Help Net Security
J
Java Code Geeks
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
B
Blog RSS Feed
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research

DataCore Software

Des PVC à l’ingénierie de plateforme : le stockage comme problème d’expérience développeur What AI Workloads Need from Kubernetes Storage | DataCore Software Perché lo storage persistente è essenziale per eseguire workload stateful in Kubernetes Alta disponibilità Kubernetes per applicazioni stateful OpenShift Storage per carichi di lavoro stateful: risolvere le sfide di performance e latenza Comment garantir le bon fonctionnement des sites Edge lorsque le matériel est difficile à se procurer | DataCore Software Comment réduire l'impact des retards liés au matériel de stockage | DataCore Software Kubernetes Persistent Storage as Developer Experience | DataCore Software Rilevamento di malware in un panorama delle minacce in continua evoluzione | DataCore Software Perché i responsabili IT devono ripensare i concetti di “refresh” e “lock-in” | DataCore Software Warum Speicher heute eine der obersten Prioritäten bei der Compliance ist | DataCore Software Pourquoi le stockage est désormais une priorité absolue en matière de conformité How to Keep Edge Sites Running When Hardware Is Hard to Get OpenShift Storage pour les charges de travail stateful : résoudre les défis de performance et de latence How to Reduce the Impact of Storage Hardware Delays Why Storage Is Now a Top Compliance Priority OpenShift Storage für Stateful Workloads: Bewältigung von Herausforderungen hinsichtlich Leistung und Latenz Das Ende der vorhersehbaren Speicherkosten: Warum IT-Verantwortliche im Jahr 2026 ihre Strategien zu Erneuerung und Anbieterabhängigkeit überdenken müssen Eliminare i colli di bottiglia dello storage con NVMe-oF Come superare i problemi legati ai dati nascosti che paralizzano le prestazioni HPC? La fin de l’économie prévisible du stockage : pourquoi les responsables IT doivent repenser le renouvellement et le verrouillage fournisseur en 2026 Spezzare la maledizione della migrazione dei dati: zero downtime, zero drammi Il vero costo delle interruzioni: perché ogni secondo conta TCO vs ROI: l’argomento economico a favore dell’infrastruttura iperconvergente Snapshot immutabili: alzare il livello della protezione dei dati aziendali Intelligentere Malware-Erkennung und -Reaktion für eine sich ständig verändernde Bedrohungslandschaft Détection et réponse aux malwares plus intelligentes pour un paysage de menaces en constante évolution The End of Predictable Storage Economics: Why IT Leaders Must Rethink Refresh and Lock-In in 2026
OpenShift Storage for Stateful Workloads: Solving Perform...
Ville Juhola · 2026-04-14 · via DataCore Software

When a traditional external storage array isn’t enough, it’s usually because the infrastructure has evolved faster than the data plane. For years, the industry operated under the assumption that storage was a static entity—a “black box” sitting outside the compute cluster. But as Red Hat OpenShift becomes the cornerstone of the modern data center, that separation is no longer just an architectural nuance; it is a performance bottleneck.

Since the beginning of 2024, the momentum behind Red Hat OpenShift has accelerated to unprecedented levels. According to recent data from Red Hat, customer adoption of OpenShift Virtualization alone has surged by 178% since early 2024, with production deployments growing significantly as organizations seek a stable, scalable alternative to legacy hypervisors. This shift is driven by a need for a unified substrate that handles both containerized microservices and legacy virtual machines. However, as you scale these environments, you quickly discover that while OpenShift can orchestrate a thousand containers in seconds, the underlying OpenShift storage often struggles to keep pace.

OpenShift Storage Challenge: The “Stateful” Friction in a Stateless World

The industry often tells you that the Container Storage Interface (CSI) is the universal answer to Kubernetes storage. In practice, the CSI is merely a translator. It allows OpenShift to “talk” to an external array, but it does nothing to address the fundamental architectural mismatch between distributed orchestration and centralized storage.

The hidden problem isn’t just connectivity; it’s latency and deterministic behavior.

When you run high-performance stateful workloads—such as PostgreSQL, Kafka, or AI training pipelines—on OpenShift, you encounter the “I/O Blender” effect. Traditional SANs are designed for the predictable, slow-moving world of physical servers. In a dynamic OpenShift environment, pods are ephemeral. They move. They scale. They fail and restart on different nodes.

If your OpenShift storage layer isn’t Kubernetes-native, you face three critical gaps:

  1. Mount-Time Latency: Waiting for a legacy SAN to re-map a LUN to a new node when a pod migrates can take minutes. In a microservices architecture, minutes are an eternity.
  2. Performance Inconsistency: Traditional arrays often lack the granular visibility to prioritize specific Persistent Volume Claims (PVCs), leading to “noisy neighbor” issues that degrade application performance.
  3. Complex Day 2 Operations: Managing storage through a separate console, outside of OpenShift’s oc CLI or GitOps workflows, breaks the automation chain.

The Solution: DataCore Puls8 as OpenShift Storage Fabric

Puls Logo StackedDataCore Puls8 is engineered to eliminate the friction between the orchestrator and the disk. Rather than acting as an external attachment, Puls8 functions as a distributed storage fabric that lives within the OpenShift cluster. It treats storage as a first-class citizen of the Kubernetes stack.

Puls8 resolves the “gap” by moving the data plane into the kernel space of the worker nodes. This ensures that storage performance is deterministic. When you provision a volume via a StorageClass, Puls8 doesn’t just carve out space on an array; it orchestrates a high-performance path using NVMe-over-Fabrics (NVMe-oF) protocols to ensure that I/O latency remains at sub-millisecond levels, regardless of cluster scale.

By using synchronous replication, Puls8 ensures that data is always available across multiple availability zones or nodes. This isn’t just about “backup”; it’s about resilient continuity. If a node fails, the data already exists on another node, allowing the OpenShift scheduler to restart the pod instantly without waiting for complex storage re-attachments.

OpenShift Storage | Kubernetes-Native Storage

The Walkthrough: Real-World Resilience in an OpenShift Cluster

Consider a common scenario: You are running a mission-critical MongoDB cluster on OpenShift across a three-node configuration.

In a traditional setup, if Node 1 fails, the OpenShift scheduler moves the MongoDB pod to Node 2. The CSI driver must then signal the external array to unmap the volume from Node 1 and map it to Node 2. If the “unmap” command hangs—a common occurrence in legacy fabrics—the volume becomes locked, and your database remains offline.

With DataCore Puls8, the workflow is automated and deterministic:

  • Provisioning: You define a Puls8 StorageClass with a replication factor of three. Puls8 automatically distributes data replicas across your worker nodes.
  • The Failure: Node 1 goes offline unexpectedly.
  • The Recovery: OpenShift detects the failure and schedules the pod on Node 2. Because Puls8 has already maintained a synchronous, bit-for-bit replica of the data on Node 2, the volume is instantly available.
  • The Business Outcome: There is no manual intervention, no “stale lock” on the SAN, and no extended downtime. The application resumes operation in seconds.

This approach transforms storage from a reactive component into an automated utility. You are no longer managing LUNs or masking; you are managing policies through the same YAML manifests you use for your applications.

Conclusion: Engineering for Certainty

The move to OpenShift is a strategic decision to embrace modern, automated infrastructure. However, that strategy is only as robust as its weakest link. Relying on legacy storage architectures to power a next-generation container platform introduces unnecessary risk and operational overhead.

Icon KubernetesstorageDataCore Puls8 provides the bridge between the agility of Kubernetes and the reliability required by the enterprise. It’s not about merely providing “capacity” to your containers; it’s about providing a resilient, high-performance data plane that scales linearly with your ambitions. It’s about knowing your data is safe and your performance is guaranteed, not just hoping it is.

Ready to see Puls8 in action?

This video demonstrates how DataCore Puls8 provides synchronous replication and automatic failover within a Kubernetes cluster to ensure data remains accessible even during node failures.

Solving OpenShift storage challenges requires a Kubernetes-native approach that delivers consistent performance, high availability, and simplified operations.

GET FREE TRIAL OF PULS8