惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园 - 【当耐特】
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
雷峰网
雷峰网
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
罗磊的独立博客
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
小众软件
小众软件
J
Java Code Geeks
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园_首页
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
V
Visual Studio Blog
The Cloudflare Blog
月光博客
月光博客
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
U
Unit 42

IBM Research

From error mitigation to fault-tolerant quantum computing | IBM Quantum Computing Blog A theoretical separation between quantum computers & LLMs Introducing IBM and NASA’s new foundation model for the Moon Switzerland's first IBM Quantum System Two | IBM Quantum Computing Blog Cleveland Clinic, RIKEN, IBM named Gordon Bell finalists | IBM Quantum Computing Blog How llm-d makes the most of the hardware you already have Ponder This Challenge - September 2026 - Loeschian Arithmetic Progressions IBM Quantum Nighthawk r2—more circuits, faster | IBM Quantum Computing Blog What happens when information theory accounts for reasoning? Granite 4.2 brings native reasoning to enterprise agents Qiskit Fermions: a modular toolbox for fermionic systems | IBM Quantum Computing Blog IBM’s new modular architecture for cryogenic systems | IBM Quantum Computing Blog QOBLIB: tracking progress in quantum optimization | IBM Quantum Computing Blog DocLang: a markup language for LLMs From vision to reality: a unified AI solver for the grid The search for quantum advantage in differential equations Quantum advantage through trusted quantum computation | IBM Quantum Computing Blog All of AI benchmarking at your fingertips What are spin qubits? | IBM Quantum Computing Blog IBM to acquire HRL Laboratories IBM commits $50M in quantum access for US Genesis Mission It’s time for cryptography to get its own abstraction layer It’s time for cryptography to get its own abstraction layer This could be the largest synthetic code dataset yet How to measure the performance of a quantum computer | IBM Quantum Computing Blog Release News: Qiskit v2.5 is here! | IBM Quantum Computing Blog CoFrGeNets replace the ‘bones’ of transformer-based models How training environments can teach AI models to misbehave What’s new at IBM Quantum - Q2 2026 | IBM Quantum Computing Blog Modeling the chemistry of fusion reactor material | IBM Quantum Computing Blog
Ponder This Challenge - August 2026 - The Wheel of Buttons
Gadi Aleksandrowicz · 2026-08-01 · via IBM Research

The Wheel of Buttons

This puzzle was suggested by Sanandan Swaminathan - thanks!

A game show is arranged as follows: The main attraction is a wheel that has NN buttons equidistant from one another, such that the wheel looks perfectly symmetric.

Each button has two possible states: "on" and "off". There's no indicator to the status of a button, and each press toggles between those two states ("on" -> "off" -> "on" and so forth). At the beginning of the game, the buttons have random states with the one condition that not all buttons are "on".

On each turn, the wheel spins randomly without the contestant looking; the buttons are marked with 1,2,…1,2,\ldots beginning at the top-left button and going clockwise. The contestant picks a subset of the buttons and pushes them. After the contestant is done, two things can happen:

  1. If all the buttons are "on", the contestant wins; this is made clear with balloons and confetti.
  2. If not all the buttons are "on", a new round begins. Again, the wheel is spun without the contestant seeing it.

The contestant's goal is to find a strategy that guarantees winning in the least number of rounds, even if the game cheats and the spins of the wheel are not random.

The choices of the contestant can be described by a sequence of natural numbers. Rounds are separated by 0, and each round contains the numbers of the buttons pressed by the contestant.

For example, the following is an optimal solution for the case N=2N=2:

If both buttons were "off" at the beginning, the game is won after the first round. Otherwise, after the second round both buttons have the same state, so after the third round, the contestant has certainly won the game.

Summing up the numbers in the solution, we arrive at the value 77. If, in the middle round, we would have used 2 instead of 1, we'd reach the value 88. We are interested in the minimum value that can be obtained from an optimal solution: We call this the "optimal solution sum" for NN.

Your goal: Find the optimal solution sum for N=8N=8.

A bonus "*" will be given for finding the optimal solution sum for N=64N=64.