惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
G
Google Developers Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
D
DataBreaches.Net
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
爱范儿
爱范儿
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
I
InfoQ
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
V
V2EX
B
Blog
罗磊的独立博客
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More

Stories by RogerKay on Medium

MAGA Flips from No Masks to Masks in a Heartbeat The Astounding Unawareness of the Epstein Class Efficiency isn’t Everything My Happiest Moment Cirque de Consolation What This Country Needs is … Safety Valve Coats and Ties Can’t Hide the Nature of Adolescent Boys The Missing Voice Of Charlie Hebdo
A Discontinuity That’s Certain, and Probably Negative
RogerKay · 2024-10-07 · via Stories by RogerKay on Medium

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Simple model for looking at likely economic scenarios under different election outcomes

RogerKay

We are living in odd times. We find ourselves tossed from one calamity to the next, not knowing what to expect. But there is a certainty ahead of us in the next month, the Presidential election, which will definitely occur, but the outcome of which could go a number of distinctly different directions.

This discontinuity presents an opportunity to dare to think the unthinkable and follow each likely path along its expected unfolding. The first bifurcation occurs when one or the other candidate wins the election. I realize there are a lot of asterisks on that (which is part of the story), but it helps to start with a simplified model and add complications later.

I’ve given my own probabilities to the election outcome (Nate Silver and 538 notwithstanding), which puts Harris at 60% likely and Trump at 40%. Call it wishful thinking, or betting that the decent people in the political center are repelled by Trump but too quiet or intimidated to proclaim it. They know they have one vote and will cast it without fanfare. The key to a simple model is that all probabilities are rough and represent heuristics rather than mathematically accurate representations.

Be that as it may, I’m going with a slightly greater likelihood that Harris wins. Thereafter, of course, the two paths diverge strongly.