惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

WordPress大学
WordPress大学
J
Java Code Geeks
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
月光博客
月光博客
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
爱范儿
爱范儿
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
GbyAI
GbyAI
博客园 - 【当耐特】
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
罗磊的独立博客
The Cloudflare Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
V
V2EX
博客园 - 司徒正美

博客园 - rocman

不是我发现了美,只不过这个世界本身就很美。记快乐的今年生日。 今天开学了,按计划争取了不少学习的时间。 The second exercise book is used up today. To my dear classmates, the list below might be helpful to you when you are studying the discrete mathematics in English as I am I was watching a teleplay titled "Plot Against" on my computer today. - rocman 转载:程序员喝酒的计算机文化 Beckham and Logyrant have come back to shenzhen. Today I told my parents the idea I solved only one problem today, but it's a big one! - rocman I am trying to solve the "zebra puzzle" Feb, 5, 2006, the day should be remembered. My exercise book was used up today. 转载:『希腊神话【3】Apollo 阿波罗』 转载:『希腊神话【2】Pandora 潘多拉』 转载:『希腊神话【1】The Olympian Gods 奥林波斯山神』 I've got so many "hongbaos"(should it be translated as "red bags"?) Happy new year!!! I've solved 2 challenging logic problems today. I should go on my learning discrete mathematics.
I've found out why I did wrong in that logic problem.
rocman · 2006-02-01 · via 博客园 - rocman

     Few days ago, I wrote down something about a logic problem, in which I encounter a problem that I couldn't understand. Today, when I was having lunch, I spended a few minutes in thinking the problem. And I've understood it now. I answered the problem like this: "In the list, the 49 statements in the front is true, while others are false.", but the key is "This cannot happen; it is a paradox, showing that these cannot be statements". To understand this, we should focus on the statements right after the 49th, namely, the 50th. What's the truth value of it? If it is true, then according to its meaning, there will be at most 49 true statement in the list. But according the conclusion I wrote before, if the 50th statement is ture, then the 50 statements in the front of the list will consequently be true. Obviously, 49 doesn't equals 50. So there is a contradiction here, making the list a paradox.

posted on 2006-02-01 01:53  rocman  阅读(280)  评论()    收藏  举报