惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

I
InfoQ
博客园_首页
美团技术团队
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
H
Help Net Security
J
Java Code Geeks
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Jina AI
Jina AI
量子位
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
G
Google Developers Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
小众软件
小众软件
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
L
LangChain Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
V
Visual Studio Blog
博客园 - Franky
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知

Archive.is blog

Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog • "Trustworthiness" in my question meant "reputation of being trustworthy", i.e. reputation of you not modifying saved pages to insert fake information into them. Guarantees about your archive being trustworthy are literally on the main page: > Archive.today is a time capsule for web pages! It takes a 'snapshot' of a webpage that will always be online even if the original page disappears > … > and provides a short and reliable link to an unalterable record of any web page. This was true until very recently you chose to tarnish that reputation and began inserting fake information into saved pages. • Do you think there's absolutely no illegal content on your archive, including CSAM? That's simply consequences of you refusing to remove information no matter what. I'm not saying that this approach is wrong or right, you just need to accept these consequences when someone points them out. • Is me saying that some website/company is American also "nationalism" or whatever bad political position you think it is? Or Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog Archive.is blog
Archive.is blog
archive-is · 2026-02-25 · via Archive.is blog
  • anyway, what's your relations to verified.lu?

    匿名

    The same as to the Olympic ice skater: Patokallio’s cherry-picking.

    Better ask Patokallio why he wrote on verified.lu and ignored the ice skater, and how that logic got propagated to become an authoritative source? And how should we treat those who spread this (including Wikipedia), realizing that it is either satire or provocation? With flattery, perhaps?