惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
小众软件
小众软件
月光博客
月光博客
D
DataBreaches.Net
L
LangChain Blog
美团技术团队
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
博客园 - 司徒正美
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
H
Help Net Security
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
Y
Y Combinator Blog
I
InfoQ
U
Unit 42
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
J
Java Code Geeks
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
腾讯CDC
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler

Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC

Multiple Vulnerabilities in Oracle Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Secure Email Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability in GitLab Could Allow for Disclosure of Sensitive Data Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ivanti Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in SAP Extended Passport (EPP) Processing Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, September 8, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in DellSecure Connect Gateway Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in SonicWall SMA1000 Series Appliances Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in PaperCut Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Oracle Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in SonicWall GMS Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in Zoom Clients Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, August 11, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in SolarWinds Web Help Desk Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in VeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) On-Prem Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability Chain in WordPress Core Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, July 14, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution
Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mikrotik Routers Could Allow ...
2026-09-15 · via Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC

MS-ISAC ADVISORY NUMBER:

2026-095

DATE(S) ISSUED:

09/14/2026

OVERVIEW:

Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in MikroTik Routers, the most severe of which could allow for admin hijacking. MikroTik routers are network devices that use the RouterOS operating system to provide advanced routing, firewall, wireless, VPN, bandwidth management, and network security features for homes, businesses, and internet service providers. Successful exploitation of the most severe of these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to take full control of a device without authentication.

THREAT INTELLIGENCE:

There are reports of these vulnerabilities being exploited in the wild.

SYSTEMS AFFECTED:

  • MikroTik in RouterOS prior to versions 7.25beta3, 7.24.2, 7.23.4, and 6.49.21

RISK:

Government:

Large and medium government entitiesHIGH

Small governmentMEDIUM

Businesses:

Large and medium business entitiesHIGH

Small business entitiesMEDIUM

TECHNICAL SUMMARY:

Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in MikroTik routers, the most severe of which could allow for admin hijacking. Details of these vulnerabilities are below: 

Tactic: Privilege Escalation (TA0004):

Technique: Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Bypass User Account Control (T1548.002):

  • An SSH authentication bypass caused by RouterOS comparing only the public modulus of a user’s RSA key instead of the entire key, letting an attacker who knew a username and its modulus craft a different key and log in without the private key, gaining that account’s privileges. ( CVE-2026-67276)

Tactic: Privilege Escalation (TA0004):

Technique: Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068):

  • A privilege escalation flaw in how RouterOS handled SSH usernames beginning with a disallowed character, letting an attacker craft a username that returned a session with full administrative privileges. (CVE-2026-86060)
  • A flaw in bandwidth-test service, which let unauthenticated connections reach a state normally reserved for logged-in users. Combined with a leak of uninitialized packet-buffer data and an integer underflow in size validation, this could expose kernel memory or crash the device into a restart. (CVE-2026-67277) 

Successful exploitation of the most severe of these vulnerabilities could result in the attacker taking full control of a device without authentication.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

We recommend the following actions be taken:

  • Apply the stable channel update provided by MikroTik to vulnerable systems immediately after appropriate testing. (M1051: Update Software)
  • Safeguard 7.1: Establish and Maintain a Vulnerability Management Process: Establish and maintain a documented vulnerability management process for enterprise assets. Review and update documentation annually, or when significant enterprise changes occur that could impact this Safeguard.
  • Safeguard 7.2: Establish and Maintain a Remediation Process: Establish and maintain a risk-based remediation strategy documented in a remediation process, with monthly, or more frequent, reviews.
  • Safeguard 7.6: Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Externally-Exposed Enterprise Assets: Perform automated vulnerability scans of externally-exposed enterprise assets using a SCAP-compliant vulnerability scanning tool. Perform scans on a monthly, or more frequent, basis.
  • Safeguard 7.7: Remediate Detected Vulnerabilities: Remediate detected vulnerabilities in software through processes and tooling on a monthly, or more frequent, basis, based on the remediation process.
  • Safeguard 16.13: Conduct Application Penetration Testing: Conduct application penetration testing. For critical applications, authenticated penetration testing is better suited to finding business logic vulnerabilities than code scanning and automated security testing. Penetration testing relies on the skill of the tester to manually manipulate an application as an authenticated and unauthenticated user.
  • Safeguard 18.1: Establish and Maintain a Penetration Testing Program: Establish and maintain a penetration testing program appropriate to the size, complexity, and maturity of the enterprise. Penetration testing program characteristics include scope, such as network, web application, Application Programming Interface (API), hosted services, and physical premise controls; frequency; limitations, such as acceptable hours, and excluded attack types; point of contact information; remediation, such as how findings will be routed internally; and retrospective requirements.
  • Safeguard 18.2: Perform Periodic External Penetration Tests: Perform periodic external penetration tests based on program requirements, no less than annually. External penetration testing must include enterprise and environmental reconnaissance to detect exploitable information. Penetration testing requires specialized skills and experience and must be conducted through a qualified party. The testing may be clear box or opaque box.
  • Safeguard 18.3: Remediate Penetration Test Findings: Remediate penetration test findings based on the enterprise’s policy for remediation scope and prioritization. 
  • Apply the Principle of Least Privilege to all systems and services. Run all software as a non-privileged user (one without administrative privileges) to diminish the effects of a successful attack. (M1026: Privileged Account Management)
  • Safeguard 4.7: Manage Default Accounts on Enterprise Assets and Software: Manage default accounts on enterprise assets and software, such as root, administrator, and other pre-configured vendor accounts. Example implementations can include: disabling default accounts or making them unusable.
  • Safeguard 5.4: Restrict Administrator Privileges to Dedicated Administrator Accounts: Restrict administrator privileges to dedicated administrator accounts on enterprise assets. Conduct general computing activities, such as internet browsing, email, and productivity suite use, from the user’s primary, non-privileged account. 
  • Restrict use of certain websites, block downloads/attachments, block Javascript, restrict browser extensions, etc. (M1021: Restrict Web-Based Content)
  • Safeguard 2.3: Address Unauthorized Software: Ensure that unauthorized software is either removed from use on enterprise assets or receives a documented exception. Review monthly, or more frequently.
  • Safeguard 2.7: Allowlist Authorized Scripts: Use technical controls, such as digital signatures and version control, to ensure that only authorized scripts, such as specific .ps1, .py, etc., files, are allowed to execute. Block unauthorized scripts from executing. Reassess bi-annually, or more frequently.
  • Safeguard 9.3: Maintain and Enforce Network-Based URL Filters: Enforce and update network-based URL filters to limit an enterprise asset from connecting to potentially malicious or unapproved websites. Example implementations include category-based filtering, reputation-based filtering, or through the use of block lists. Enforce filters for all enterprise assets.
  • Safeguard 9.6: Block Unnecessary File Types: Block unnecessary file types attempting to enter the enterprise’s email gateway. 
  • Use capabilities to detect and block conditions that may lead to or be indicative of a software exploit occurring. (M1050: Exploit Protection)
  • Safeguard 10.5: Enable Anti-Exploitation Features: Enable anti-exploitation features on enterprise assets and software, where possible, such as Microsoft? Data Execution Prevention (DEP), Windows? Defender Exploit Guard (WDEG), or Apple? System Integrity Protection (SIP) and Gatekeeper™. 
  • Block execution of code on a system through application control, and/or script blocking. (M1038: Execution Prevention)
  • Safeguard 2.5: Allowlist Authorized Software: Use technical controls, such as application allowlisting, to ensure that only authorized software can execute or be accessed. Reassess bi-annually, or more frequently.
  • Safeguard 2.6: Allowlist Authorized Libraries: Use technical controls to ensure that only authorized software libraries, such as specific .dll, .ocx, .so, etc., files, are allowed to load into a system process. Block unauthorized libraries from loading into a system process. Reassess bi-annually, or more frequently.
  • Safeguard 2.7: Allowlist Authorized Scripts: Use technical controls, such as digital signatures and version control, to ensure that only authorized scripts, such as specific .ps1, .py, etc., files, are allowed to execute. Block unauthorized scripts from executing. Reassess bi-annually, or more frequently. 
  • Use capabilities to prevent suspicious behavior patterns from occurring on endpoint systems. This could include suspicious process, file, API call, etc. behavior. (M1040: Behavior Prevention on Endpoint)
  • Safeguard 13.2: Deploy a Host-Based Intrusion Detection Solution: Deploy a host-based intrusion detection solution on enterprise assets, where appropriate and/or supported.
  • Safeguard 13.7: Deploy a Host-Based Intrusion Prevention Solution: Deploy a host-based intrusion prevention solution on enterprise assets, where appropriate and/or supported. Example implementations include use of an Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) client or host-based IPS agent.

REFERENCES:

CVE
Help Net Security
MikroTik