惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

J
Java Code Geeks
IT之家
IT之家
爱范儿
爱范儿
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
博客园_首页
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
V
Visual Studio Blog
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
GbyAI
GbyAI
V
V2EX
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
Vercel News
Vercel News
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
量子位
博客园 - Franky
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
博客园 - 司徒正美
月光博客
月光博客
F
Fortinet All Blogs

The Rust Programming Language Forum - Latest topics

Beginner building a Rust backend framework (AI-assisted) — feedback appreciated C++ to Rust -- Exceptions Re-exporting a trait with a custom derive_macro Gold linker is deprecated Why is using PhantomData valid in this case? Code review for Static Pool Allocator Looking for a pool based allocator Why is this legal? What does it mean for Rustc to run "out of TLS keys"? Using async/await internally with no internal runtime, but exposing a nonblocking poll API — is this a reasonable design? Testing functions that use randomness `cargo-path`: improve coding agents&#39; ability to find Rust documentation Rust task runners Lifetime weird case Windows - USB device not detected A random rustc-ice-[...].txt file appeared Develop rust where the environment is setup in a docker Undefined Behavior: in-bounds pointer arithmetic failed: attempting to offset pointer by 20 bytes, but got alloc238 which is only 1 byte from the end of the allocation Unbug 0.5 - Runtime debug assertions Is there a tiny error in section 6.2 Reference types? Lifetime woes implementing ratatui::Widget for a reference Rusqlite + Chrono: How do I simplify code to obtain chrono datetime value From OOP to Rust – struggling with code organization and data structure design Way to avoid a self-referential struct Rust RF and audio resources/communities Whyhttp - HTTP mocks that fail where the bug actually is Using tokio channel permits in a tower service Arc::increment_strong_count design question (cross-post) `&T`, `&mut T`, `Pin<&mut T>` and `&Cell<T>`: Ways of Borrowing a `T` Ratatui detect arrow key press and release
Crates with excluded proprietary parts
blonk · 2026-04-17 · via The Rust Programming Language Forum - Latest topics

April 17, 2026, 9:45am 1

I was asked if I want to port an old C library to Rust, and while niche it seems like a pretty cool library to have (in case anyone is dabbling with mixmaster/mixminion type networks in Rust). However, the C version has a feature (involving forward error correction) that the client is a little unsure about with regards to ownership and patents. (Because of how old this library is, it makes me suspect there are no patent issues, but that's beside the point).

I asked if I could make the library open source, and they are fine with it as long as the fec support is left out.

Let's say I would ideally like to not have two different repos/projects for this, what mechanisms does rust/cargo have to help allow more code in the repo than in the published crate?

My spitball idea is to have build.rs check for the existence of src/fec.rs and set a cfg parameter if it finds it, and add the src/fec.rs to the exclude list in Cargo.toml.

Anyone know if there are any crates that do anything like this that one can take inspiration from?

I may end up setting up two different repositories, just to lessen the risk of accidental publishing of the fec parts. But I'm curious to know how this could be accomplished with a single repo and how safe from accidental-publishing-of-the-proprietary-parts one can make it.

ZiCog April 17, 2026, 9:56am 2

How big and complex is that forward error correction? Is there a specification for it? Potentially you could delete the old C implementation (thus leaving it out as required) and create a new implementation in Rust from scratch. Assuming any patents on it have expired you would be in the clear.

giocri April 17, 2026, 9:57am 3

i'd advise you to not keep code with different licenses in the same repo, best solution is to just have 2 repos and use a git dependency

abj April 17, 2026, 11:15am 4

I think two repos is the way to go, otherwise it is a high risk of accidental publishing. There are just too many cases of this already and once code is out, it is out, no way back.

Feature gate the proprietary part, use your own non-public package repo and all should be fine as long as code compiles/works with or without given feature. But for library to be more useful it would be nice that proprietary part can be replaced by non-proprietary, so when designing that should be taken into account (maybe use generics or what not), otherwise the library might not be as useful as it could be.

akrauze April 17, 2026, 12:33pm 5

You left out pretty important topic. How do you want to distribute this library and its proprietary part? How was C library distributed? Will you write a rust implementation and compile it to a shared library with C ABI? Should it be used by normal Rust projects with Cargo integration?

kornel April 18, 2026, 1:32am 6

You can use include in Cargo.toml to select only files/dirs you want to publish.

cargo package --list to verify that it selects what you want.

You can use .cargo/config.toml to have local settings that don't get published, and there you can set a custom env var or cfg or [patch.crates-io] to disable or substitute some code.

You can also just use a regular Cargo flag that puts unpublished module behind the flag. The published crate will work without the file as long as the Cargo feature isn't enabled. If a mod is disabled, Rust wont look for it. rustfmt might complain, but a) #[rustfmt::skip] solves that too, b) nobody needs to run rustfmt on a published crate.