惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

量子位
I
InfoQ
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
爱范儿
爱范儿
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
美团技术团队
小众软件
小众软件
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
Jina AI
Jina AI
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
H
Help Net Security
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
博客园_首页
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
L
LangChain Blog
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
G
Google Developers Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
博客园 - Franky

Writing - Toby Ord

Curating the World — Toby Ord Mathematics is Much More than Proof — Toby Ord Broad Timelines — Toby Ord Hazard Rates for AI Agents Decline as a Task Goes On — Toby Ord Are the Costs of AI Agents Also Rising Exponentially? — Toby Ord How Well Does RL Scale? — Toby Ord Evidence that Recent AI Gains are Mostly from Inference-Scaling — Toby Ord The Extreme Inefficiency of RL for Frontier Models — Toby Ord Is there a Half-Life for the Success Rates of AI Agents? — Toby Ord Inference Scaling Reshapes AI Governance — Toby Ord Inference Scaling and the Log-x Chart — Toby Ord The Scaling Paradox — Toby Ord The Precipice Revisited — Toby Ord On the Value of Advancing Progress — Toby Ord Robust Longterm Comparisons — Toby Ord The timing of labour aimed at reducing existential risk — Toby Ord Remembering Peter Eckersley — Toby Ord Casting the Decisive Vote — Toby Ord
A Child's Plaything — Toby Ord
March 17, 2023Toby Ord · 2023-03-17 · via Writing - Toby Ord

Writing

Imagine if we could somehow show the people of the eighteenth century a simple child’s toy from today — say, a speaking doll.

The common folk would marvel at its ability to speak its few stock phrases. The scientists and engineers would marvel even more at its innards; at the minutely detailed silicon; at the bewildering complexity soon to be within their grasp.

But the economists would be amazed. For this design — so far beyond the peak of their world’s powers — was not a gift for a King or Queen, but clearly just a child’s toy. And not just that. The very banality of the toy, the artlessness of the sculpting and the way the paint doesn’t even quite line up with the contours of the doll’s face, prove that this is not the toy of a prince — but of poor child. And they would understand that the people of our time are so wealthy, so powerful, that every one of them has access to machines with thousands of parts working in concert, and that it is less effort to build such a wondrous machine than to simply paint a doll’s eyebrows in their right places.

$\setCounter{0}$