惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

GbyAI
GbyAI
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
博客园 - 叶小钗
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
H
Help Net Security
G
Google Developers Blog
D
Docker
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
A
About on SuperTechFans
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
博客园 - 聂微东
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
腾讯CDC
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
I
InfoQ
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News

UK Regulators Issue Joint Statement on Age Assurance for Online Services

UK Regulators Issue Joint Statement on Age Assurance for Online Services Alabama Enacts App Store Accountability Act Requiring Age Verification UK ICO Launches Consultation on New Guidance on Research, Archiving and Statistics Provisions
Virginia Appeals Preliminary Injunction Barring Enforceme...
2026-03-19 · via UK Regulators Issue Joint Statement on Age Assurance for Online Services

Virginia Appeals Preliminary Injunction Barring Enforcement of Age-Based Restrictions on Social Media Use  

On March 3, 2026, the Virginia Attorney General appealed a U.S. District Court’s grant of a preliminary injunction barring the enforcement of a new Virginia law requiring age verification and a time limit on social media use by minors under the age of 16 pending a final determination on the merits.  

The Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act was amended by Virginia Senate Bill 854 (“the Act”) to restrict the use of social media platforms by minors under 16. In particular, the Act requires social media platforms to use “commercially reasonable methods” to determine whether a user is under 16 and to limit such minors’ use of the platform to one hour a day, absent verifiable parental consent to an increased limit.  

The preliminary injunction was obtained by NetChoice, a technology industry trade association, in NetChoice v. Jones, Case No. 1:25‑cv‑2067 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. NetChoice is challenging the constitutionality of the Act. As in litigation that NetChoice has filed in other states, NetChoice asserts, among other things, that the Act violates the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech.

The District Court found that the Act’s requirements likely constitute a content-based restriction on speech, noting that the Act distinguishes between content types, exempting news, sports, entertainment and ecommerce content while restricting user-created social media content. Content-based restrictions trigger the highest level of scrutiny under the Constitution, requiring the Attorney General to show that the Act serves a compelling interest and is narrowly tailored.

While the Court agreed that Virginia has a compelling interest in addressing the youth mental‑health crisis, it did not agree that the Act is narrowly tailored. The Court noted that the Act required all users, including adults, to verify their age before accessing protected speech, and that minors could be barred from more than one hour of otherwise lawful content, such as watching an educational or religious livestream for longer than an hour.