I examine a conceptual model of a recommendation system (RS) with user inflow and churn dynamics. When inflow and churn balance out, the user distribution reaches a steady state. Changing the recommendation algorithm alters the steady state and creates a transition period. During this period, the RS behaves differently from its new steady state. In particular, A/B experiment metrics obtained in transition periods are biased indicators of the RS's long-term performance. Scholars and practitioners, however, often conduct A/B tests shortly after introducing new algorithms to validate their effectiveness. This A/B experiment paradigm, widely regarded as the gold standard for assessing RS improvements, may consequently yield false conclusions. I also briefly touch on the data bias caused by the user retention dynamics.