A fundamental assumption underling any Hypothesis Testing (HT) problem is that the available data follow the parametric model assumed to derive the test statistic. Nevertheless, a perfect match between the true and the assumed data models cannot be achieved in many practical applications. In all these cases, it is advisable to use a robust decision test, i.e. a test whose statistic preserves (at least asymptotically) the same probability density function (pdf) for a suitable set of possible input data models under the null hypothesis. Building upon the seminal work of Kent (1982), in this paper we investigate the impact of the model mismatch in a recurring HT problem in radar signal processing applications: testing the mean of a set of Complex Elliptically Symmetric (CES) distributed random vectors under a possible misspecified, Gaussian data model. In particular, by using this general misspecified framework, a new look to two popular detectors, the Kelly's Generalized Likelihood Ration Test (GLRT) and the Adaptive Matched Filter (AMF), is provided and their robustness properties investigated.