惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

WordPress大学
WordPress大学
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
C
Check Point Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
B
Blog RSS Feed
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
量子位
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Jina AI
Jina AI
IT之家
IT之家
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
博客园 - 叶小钗
J
Java Code Geeks
The Cloudflare Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
腾讯CDC
P
Proofpoint News Feed
美团技术团队
H
Help Net Security
B
Blog
博客园_首页

math.ST updates on arXiv.org

What is Learnable in Valiant's Theory of the Learnable? Learning Perturbations to Extrapolate Your LLM Byzantine-Robust Distributed Sparse Learning Revisited The Sample Complexity of Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback A proximal gradient algorithm for composite log-concave sampling Model-based Bootstrap of Controlled Markov Chains Approximation of Maximally Monotone Operators : A Graph Convergence Perspective Posterior Contraction Rates for Sparse Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks in Anisotropic Besov Spaces MIST: Reliable Streaming Decision Trees for Online Class-Incremental Learning via McDiarmid Bound A Spectral Framework for Closed-Form Relative Density Estimation Fast Rates for Offline Contextual Bandits with Forward-KL Regularization under Single-Policy Concentrability Higher-Order Equilibrium Tracking for EM-Compressible Online Estimation Scaling Limits of Long-Context Transformers A Note on Non-Negative $L_1$-Approximating Polynomials Susceptibilities and Patterning: A Primer on Linear Response in Bayesian Learning Linear Response Estimators for Singular Statistical Models Statistical inference with belief functions: A survey Robust stochastic first order methods in heavy-tailed noise via medoid mini-batch gradient sampling Every Feedforward Neural Network Definable in an o-Minimal Structure Has Finite Sample Complexity Adaptive auditing of AI systems with anytime-valid guarantees Locally Near Optimal Piecewise Linear Regression in High Dimensions via Difference of Max-Affine Functions Risk-Controlled Post-Processing of Decision Policies Covariate Balancing and Riesz Regression Should Be Guided by the Neyman Orthogonal Score in Debiased Machine Learning A Unified Pair-GRPO Family: From Implicit to Explicit Preference Constraints for Stable and General RL Alignment Time-Inhomogeneous Preconditioned Langevin Dynamics A Fine-Grained Understanding of Uniform Convergence for Halfspaces CITE: Anytime-Valid Statistical Inference in LLM Self-Consistency Ratio-based Loss Functions Optimal Confidence Band for Kernel Gradient Flow Estimator A renormalization-group inspired lattice-based framework for piecewise generalized linear models
High Dimensional Quadratic Discriminant Analysis: Optimal...
Wanjie Wang, Jingjing Wu, Zhigang Yao · 2021-08-24 · via math.ST updates on arXiv.org

Consider a two-class classification problem where we observe samples $(X_i, Y_i)$ for i = 1, ..., n, $X_i \in R^p$ and $Y_i$ in {0, 1}. Given $Y_i = k$, $X_i$ is assumed to follow a multivariate normal distribution with mean $μ_k \in R^k$ and covariance matrix $Σ_k$, k=0,1. Supposing a new sample X from the same mixture is observed, our goal is to estimate its class label Y. Such a high-dimensional classification problem has been studied thoroughly when Sigma_0 = Sigma_1. However, the discussions over the case $Σ_0 \neq Σ_1$ are much less over the years. This paper presents the quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) for the weak signals (QDAw) algorithm, and the QDA with feature selection (QDAfs) algorithm. QDAfs applies Partial Correlation Screening to estimate $\hatΩ_0$ and $\hatΩ_1$, and then applies a hard-thresholding on the diagonals of $\hatΩ_0 - \hatΩ_1$. QDAfs further includes the linear term $d^T X$, where d is achieved by a hard-thresholding on $\hatΩ_1\hatμ_1 - \hatΩ_0\hatμ_0$. We further propose the rare and weak model to model the signals in $Ω_0 - Ω_1$ and $μ_0 - μ_1$. Based on the signal weakness and sparsity in $μ_0 - μ_1$, we propose two ways to estimate labels: 1) QDAw for weak but dense signals; 2) QDAfs for relatively strong but sparse signals. We figure out the classification boundary on the 4-dim parameter space: 1) Region of possibility, where either QDAw or QDAfs will achieve a mis-classification error rate of 0; 2) Region of impossibility, where all classifiers will have a constant error rate. The numerical results from real datasets support our theories and demonstrate the necessity and superiority of using QDA over LDA for classification.