惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
雷峰网
雷峰网
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
月光博客
月光博客
博客园 - Franky
腾讯CDC
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
V
V2EX
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
量子位
Jina AI
Jina AI
Y
Y Combinator Blog
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
博客园 - 叶小钗
D
Docker
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
D
DataBreaches.Net
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss

math.ST updates on arXiv.org

What is Learnable in Valiant's Theory of the Learnable? Learning Perturbations to Extrapolate Your LLM Byzantine-Robust Distributed Sparse Learning Revisited The Sample Complexity of Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback A proximal gradient algorithm for composite log-concave sampling Model-based Bootstrap of Controlled Markov Chains Approximation of Maximally Monotone Operators : A Graph Convergence Perspective Posterior Contraction Rates for Sparse Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks in Anisotropic Besov Spaces MIST: Reliable Streaming Decision Trees for Online Class-Incremental Learning via McDiarmid Bound A Spectral Framework for Closed-Form Relative Density Estimation Fast Rates for Offline Contextual Bandits with Forward-KL Regularization under Single-Policy Concentrability Higher-Order Equilibrium Tracking for EM-Compressible Online Estimation Scaling Limits of Long-Context Transformers A Note on Non-Negative $L_1$-Approximating Polynomials Susceptibilities and Patterning: A Primer on Linear Response in Bayesian Learning Linear Response Estimators for Singular Statistical Models Statistical inference with belief functions: A survey Robust stochastic first order methods in heavy-tailed noise via medoid mini-batch gradient sampling Every Feedforward Neural Network Definable in an o-Minimal Structure Has Finite Sample Complexity Adaptive auditing of AI systems with anytime-valid guarantees Locally Near Optimal Piecewise Linear Regression in High Dimensions via Difference of Max-Affine Functions Risk-Controlled Post-Processing of Decision Policies Covariate Balancing and Riesz Regression Should Be Guided by the Neyman Orthogonal Score in Debiased Machine Learning A Unified Pair-GRPO Family: From Implicit to Explicit Preference Constraints for Stable and General RL Alignment Time-Inhomogeneous Preconditioned Langevin Dynamics A Fine-Grained Understanding of Uniform Convergence for Halfspaces CITE: Anytime-Valid Statistical Inference in LLM Self-Consistency Ratio-based Loss Functions Optimal Confidence Band for Kernel Gradient Flow Estimator A renormalization-group inspired lattice-based framework for piecewise generalized linear models
On Stepwise Control of the Generalized Familywise Error Rate
Wenge Guo, M. Bhaskara Rao · 2008-10-28 · via math.ST updates on arXiv.org

A classical approach for dealing with the multiple testing problem is to restrict attention to procedures that control the familywise error rate (FWER), the probability of at least one false rejection. In many applications, one might be willing to tolerate more than one false rejection provided the number of such cases is controlled, thereby increasing the ability of the procedure to detect false null hypotheses. This suggests replacing control of the FWER by controlling the probability of $k$ or more false rejections, which is called the $k$-FWER. In this article, a unified approach is presented for deriving the $k$-FWER controlling procedures. We first generalize the well-known closure principle in the context of the FWER to the case of controlling the $k$-FWER. Then, we discuss how to derive the $k$-FWER controlling stepwise (stepdown or stepup) procedures based on marginal $p$-values using this principle. We show that, under certain conditions, generalized closed testing procedures can be reduced to stepwise procedures, and any stepwise procedure is equivalent to a generalized closed testing procedure. Finally, we generalize the well-known Hommel procedure in two directions, and show that any generalized Hommel procedure is equivalent to a generalized closed testing procedure with the same critical values.