Q-learning with function approximation could diverge in the off-policy setting and the target network is a powerful technique to address this issue. In this manuscript, we examine the sample complexity of the associated target Q-learning algorithm in the tabular case with a generative oracle. We point out a misleading claim in [Lee and He, 2020] and establish a tight analysis. In particular, we demonstrate that the sample complexity of the target Q-learning algorithm in [Lee and He, 2020] is $\widetilde{\mathcal O}(|\mathcal S|^2|\mathcal A|^2 (1-γ)^{-5}\varepsilon^{-2})$. Furthermore, we show that this sample complexity is improved to $\widetilde{\mathcal O}(|\mathcal S||\mathcal A| (1-γ)^{-5}\varepsilon^{-2})$ if we can sequentially update all state-action pairs and $\widetilde{\mathcal O}(|\mathcal S||\mathcal A| (1-γ)^{-4}\varepsilon^{-2})$ if $γ$ is further in $(1/2, 1)$. Compared with the vanilla Q-learning, our results conclude that the introduction of a periodically-frozen target Q-function does not sacrifice the sample complexity.