惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
IT之家
IT之家
博客园 - 聂微东
Jina AI
Jina AI
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
小众软件
小众软件
爱范儿
爱范儿
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
V
Visual Studio Blog
雷峰网
雷峰网
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
博客园 - Franky
量子位
月光博客
月光博客
博客园 - 【当耐特】
博客园 - 叶小钗

cs.SI updates on arXiv.org

Hiding in Plain Sight: Finding MAHA on Reddit Prism: Structural Symmetry Scanning via Duality-Constrained Laplacian Projection MV-Gate: Insider Threat Detection via Multi-View Behavioral Statistics and Semantic Modeling Algorithmic Cultivation: How Social Media Feeds Shape User Language Universal Dynamics of Punctuated Progress AI-Mediated Communication Can Steer Collective Opinion CitePrism: Human-in-the-Loop AI for Citation Auditing and Editorial Integrity Explainable Detection of Depression Status Shifts from User Digital Traces Can Visual Mamba Improve AI-Generated Image Detection? An In-Depth Investigation ScioMind: Cognitively Grounded Multi-Agent Social Simulation with Anchoring-Based Belief Dynamics and Dynamic Profiles Humanwashing -- It Should Leave You Feeling Dirty When Do LLMs Generate Realistic Social Networks? A Multi-Dimensional Study of Culture, Language, Scale, and Method Moltbook Moderation: Uncovering Hidden Intent Through Multi-Turn Dialogue Linking Extreme Discourse to Structural Polarization in Signed Interaction Networks Predicting Channel Closures in the Lightning Network with Machine Learning Latent Causal Void: Explicit Missing-Context Reconstruction for Misinformation Detection Predictive Maps of Multi-Agent Reasoning: A Successor-Representation Spectrum for LLM Communication Topologies Large Language Models for Causal Relations Extraction in Social Media: A Validation Framework for Disaster Intelligence When Can Digital Personas Reliably Approximate Human Survey Findings? RAwR: Role-Aware Rewiring via Approximate Equitable Partition GravityGraphSAGE: Link Prediction in Directed Attributed Graphs Structure-Centric Graph Foundation Model via Geometric Bases Attention-based graph neural networks: a survey When AI Meets Science: Research Diversity, Interdisciplinarity, Visibility, and Retractions across Disciplines in a Global Surge Scalable inference of spatial regions and temporal signatures from time series Can LLMs Emulate Human Belief Dynamics? Predicting Post Virality with Temporal Cross-Attention over Trend Signals H3: A Healthcare Three-Hop Index for Physician Referral Network Prediction Dynamic Graph with Similarity-Aware Attention Graph Neural Network for Recommender Systems Spectral Graph Sparsification Preserves Representation Geometry in Graph Neural Networks
Discovering Archetypes to Interpret Evolution of Individu...
Kanika Narang, Austin Chung, Hari Sundaram, Snigdha Chaturvedi · 2019-02-15 · via cs.SI updates on arXiv.org

In this paper, we aim to discover archetypical patterns of individual evolution in large social networks. In our work, an archetype comprises of $\textit{progressive stages}$ of distinct behavior. We introduce a novel Gaussian Hidden Markov Model (G-HMM) Cluster to identify archetypes of evolutionary patterns. G-HMMs allow for: near limitless behavioral variation; imposing constraints on how individuals can evolve; different evolutionary rates; and are parsimonious. Our experiments with Academic and StackExchange dataset discover insightful archetypes. We identify four archetypes for researchers: $\textit{Steady}$, $\textit{Diverse, Evolving and Diffuse}$. We observe clear differences in the evolution of male and female researchers within the same archetype. Specifically, women and men differ within an archetype (e.g. Diverse) in how they start, how they transition and the time spent in mid-career. We also found that the differences in grant income are better explained by the differences in archetype than by differences in gender. For StackOverflow, discovered archetypes could be labeled as $\textit{Experts, Seekers, Enthusiasts, and Facilitators}$. We have strong quantitative results with competing baselines for activity prediction and perplexity. For future session prediction, the proposed G-HMM cluster model improves by an average of $32\%$ for different Stack Exchanges and $24\%$ for Academic dataset. Our model also exhibits lower perplexity than the baselines.