The complex software systems developed nowadays require assessing their quality and proneness to errors. Reducing code complexity is a never-ending problem, especially in today's fast pace of software systems development. Therefore, the industry needs to find a method to determine the qualities of a software system, the degree of difficulty in developing new functionalities, or the system's proneness to errors. One way of measuring and predicting the quality attributes of a software system is to analyse the software metrics values for it and the relationships between them. More precisely, we should study the metrics that measure and determine the degree of complexity of the code. This paper aims to analyse a novel complexity metric, Hybrid Cyclomatic Complexity (HCC) and its efficiency as a feature in a defect prediction model. The main idea behind this new metric is that inherited complexity should play a role in the complexity of a class, hence the need for a metric that calculates the total complexity of a class, taking into account the complexities of its descendants. Moreover, we will present a comparative study between the HCC metric and its two components, the inherited complexity and the actual complexity of a class in the object-oriented context. Since we want this metric to be as valuable as possible, the experiments will use data from open-source projects. One of the conclusions that can be drawn from these experiments is that inherited complexity is not correlated with class complexity. Therefore, HCC can be considered a valid metric from this point of view. Moreover, the evaluation of the efficiency of the prediction models shows us a similar efficiency for HCC and the inherited complexity. Additionally, there is a need for a clear distinction between a class's complexity and its inherited complexity when defining complexity metrics.